2007-061 Auditor's Report on Village Purchasing Procedures•
RESOLUTION 2007-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE REPORT
PREPARED BY CALER, DONTEN, LEVINE, DRUKER, PORTER &
VEIL, P.A. CONCERNING ITS REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF
THE VILLAGE'S PURCHASING AND CASH DISBURSEMENT
POLICIES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
•
r~
WHEREAS, the Village retained the firm of Caler, Donten, Levine, Druker, Porter &
Veil, P.A. ("Cater Donten") to provide consulting services and to review and evaluate the
Village's purchasing and cash disbursement policies; and
WHEREAS, the Village Council wishes to formally accept Cater Donten's report on
behalf o f the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA as follows:
Section 1. The Village Council hereby accepts the report prepared by Cater Donten
concerning its review and evaluation of the Village's purchasing and cash disbursement
policies. The report shall be utilized by the Village Administration, the Village Audit
Committee and the Village Council as a guide to strengthen internal controls and make
the Village purchasing system more effective and efficient.
Section 2 This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF MAY, 2007.
..~ ~~,
. ,Village Seal)
~~ ,~ ~,,
~,
AT1'ES i .`~~ ~'`~,,.
. .i.1. ~\I\\\.
~~~~
VILLAGE CLERK
CALER, DONTEN, LEVINE,
_., DRUI~R, PORTER 8i VEIL, P.A.
WII T iAM K. CALER. JR„ CPA
LOUiS M. COHEN, CPA
IOHN C. COURTNEY. CPA, 7D
DAVID S. DONTEN. CPA
SCOTT D. DRUKER, CPA, 7D
JAMES B. HUTCHISON, CPA
JOEL H. LEVINE, CPA
JAMES A MULLEN, IV, CPA
THOMAS A. PENCE, JR., CPA
SCOTT L. PORTER, CPA
MARK D. VEIL, CPA
CERTIFIER PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
505 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE; SUITE 900
WEST PALM BEACH, F(.33401-5948
TELEPHONE (561) 832-9292
FAX (561) 832-9455
infoQedlcpa.com
MEMBERS
AMERICAN INSTII'U7E OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Honorable Mayor and Village Council
Village of North Palm Beach
501 U.S. Highway One
North Palm Beach, Fl. 33408
We are pleased to have the opportunity to assist you in the review and evaluation of the
Village's purchasing policies. This report has been prepared to offer recommendations
to management, the Audit Committee and the Village Council for ways to strengthen
internal control and make the purchasing system more effective and efficient, where
possible.
As part of our engagement we gathered data by reviewing the existing purchasing
policies, interviewing Village staff including the Village Manager, Finance staff,
Department heads, and administrative staff responsible for procurement. We also
reviewed the internal control questionnaire completed by the Finance Director. Based
on our discussions, it appears that there have been a number of positive changes made
in the purchasing system over the past several months. Where changes have already
been instituted, we did not consider or test items under the old systems. Our
evaluation focused on opportunities to gain efficiencies and strengthen internal controls
over the purchasing system in light of current trends and the processes used by similarly
sized local governments. The following are our observations and recommendations for
your consideration.
Purchase Orders
Based on our discussions with various Village staff members, it appears that there is
some confusion over the use of purchase orders. Generally, most departments are
obtaining $1,000 purchase orders for each vendor for each budget line item. Some
departments may have several purchase orders to the same vendor because each is for a
different line item. They draw on these purchase orders until the $1,000 is expended
and then they obtain another $1,000 purchase order and repeat the process. Likewise, if
an item falls within the $1,000 to $10,000 range a similar sequence of events occurs.
Often times, a department ends up with a significant amount of outstanding purchase
orders that are unused, as well as an appearance that funds have been encumbered,
when in fact they have not. In some instances, this methodology creates a significant
amount of paperwork with no real benefit. In other instances, the intent of the
purchasing policy is being unintentionally avoided because multiple purchases under
certain dollar thresholds may, on a cumulative basis, exceed the next higher purchasing
threshold requirement. Finally, there appears to be a perception that there is a backlog
in issuing purchase orders. Some departments indicated that it takes 3 to 5 days to
obtain a purchase order, while others indicated it could take up to two weeks. The
Finance Department maintains that they issue purchase orders daily, such that by the
end of each day they have issued all purchase orders ready for processing. The Finance
Department believes that delays occur when it takes time to circulate the requisition
through a given department for approvals or when a requisition is incomplete. The
Finance Department has also committed to move occasional rush purchase orders
through the system as necessary. Management should consider having an educational
session with all key department purchasing personnel to thoroughly explain the
purchasing system, as well as any future changes that will be instituted.
Blanket Purchase Orders
The Village's current purchasing policy provides for blanket purchase orders. These are
to be used for small, daily purchases from a vendor. Examples would be office supplies,
hardware store purchases, etc. Blanket purchase orders would be used when the Village
has an ongoing relationship with a vendor and regularly makes a number of relatively
small purchases during a set time period. The blanket purchase order would not
contain specific item information, is not to be used for single or large purchases and is
not limited to a specific budget line item.
We recommend that blanket purchase orders be issued for the types of items described
above. Consideration should be given to increasing the current $1,000 dollar purchase
order threshold amount to $2,500. The dollar limit on blanket purchase orders should be
reevaluated periodically in light of purchasing needs. Invoices for items purchased on
blanket purchase orders would be coded by the line item to be charged and they would
be forwarded to the Finance Department for posting and payment. Such a system places
added responsibility on the user departments to monitor actual expenditures versus the
budget on a monthly basis.
Unfortunately, the Village's accounting software does not allow for the use of blanket
purchase orders in an efficient manner. It is our understanding that the Village's
accounting software has the capability to issue blanket purchase orders, but the system
is somewhat inflexible because it requires the blanket purchase order to be issued
against general ledger line items where the ultimate expenditures will be charged.
Furthermore, while it is possible to subsequently reallocate the blanket purchase order
line items, the effort involved leads staff back to their existing policy of issuing line item
purchase orders. Given these software limitations, we recommend that purchasing
cards (see discussion below) or open accounts at certain vendors be used for blanket
purchase order type purchases. This would eliminate a significant amount of internal
paperwork.
Purchase Order
Generally, purchase orders should be used for the purchase of a single, larger dollar
item that is not purchased on a regular basis. This would include all purchases not
covered by a blanket purchase order. In addition, all recurring monthly bills for
payment of utilities, health insurance, pre-approved maintenance and service type
contracts, etc. would not require purchase orders. We would recommend that the
purchasing order threshold be increased from $1,000 to $2,500. In addition,
management should consider increasing the capitalization threshold for capital assets
from $1,000 to $2,500.
All purchases that are budgeted to exceed $10,000 on an annual basis would exceed the
Village's bid threshold and should be bid prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. For
example, the golf course requires a significant amount of fertilizer throughout the fiscal
year. Currently, the golf course maintenance department obtains three written quotes
and generally purchases fertilizer in amounts between $1,000 and $10,000. However,
over the course of the fiscal year, the department purchases well in excess of $10,000 of
fertilizer. We believe this type of item should be subject to the Village's bidding
requirements and one bid accepted for the entire year's needs. This may also allow the
Village to take advantage of larger quantity discounts and would eliminate the staff time
and paperwork associated with multiple quotes and purchases. Likewise, other
purchases should be aggregated for the year to determine whether three written quotes
- - -- -are-required or whether competitive-bidding-is-required: -------- - - -- -- ---
Copies of all approved maintenance agreements should be submitted to the Finance
Department at the beginning of each fiscal year. An annual purchase order would be
issued for the fiscal year, if required by the vendor. None of these purchase orders
would be allowed to exceed one year.
One item brought to our attention related to repairs for items such as air conditioning or
plumbing backups. It is our understanding that most of these repairs are handled by the
facilities department under public works. If there are regularly occurring repairs that
the facilities personnel do not handle, consideration should be given to setting these
purchases up on blanket purchase orders. The other option is to treat them as
emergency purchases and have them authorized by the Village Manager
Purchasing Cards
One issue that came up during our discussions with many of the departments was that
many times when they are making travel and lodging arrangements for conferences or
purchasing items over the Internet, they must use their own credit card to make the
purchase. Many local governmental organizations have obtained purchasing cards or
credit cards for use in such instances. Purchasing cards are used in varying degrees in
different organizations and in general, the cards allow for more timely purchases with a
reduced amount of paperwork, since one check is written to the credit card company
instead of many checks to different vendors and employees for reimbursement. The
purchasing cards also eliminate questions concerning the payment of State sales tax.
Consideration should be given to obtaining a limited number of purchasing cards to be
used for specific types of purchases. It is our understanding that limits can be placed on
these cards such that only certain types of items may be purchased, as well as dollar
spending limits per day and per month. Initially, the purchasing cards might be held by
the Finance Department with other Departments having the ability to sign them out for
specific uses. The purchasing policy should address the allowable uses of the
purchasing cards. It should also be understood that all of the normal purchasing
requirements, documentation and required approvals still apply.. In addition, there
should be strong penalties for abuse of the cards.
Management should closely monitor the use of the cards over time and if effective,
consider more possible uses for the purchasing card system.
Sole Source Purchases
The Village's purchasing policy briefly addresses sole source purchases. Consideration
should be give to expanding the purchasing policy definition to include language
similar to the following: "Sole source purchases are the acquisition of goods and services
-that-for- all-practical purposes can -only be--obtained -from a -single-vendor,-usually
because of limiting technology, technological compatibility with existing systems, goods
or services already in use by the Village or other unique qualities of the goods or
services that preclude a competitor's price comparison." In addition, all sole source
purchases should be documented by a memo from a Department Head justifying why
the purchase is sole source. According to the Village's policy, the Village Manager must
approve all sole source purchases and any such purchases in excess of $10,000 must also
be approved by the Village Council.
Contract Change Orders
The Village's existing purchasing policy does not address the procedures to follow for
contract change orders. However, management is in the process of developing a new
policy that will address some of the change order issues. It is our understanding that the
Village Manager has been reviewing and approving all contract change orders prior to
payment. For example, we reviewed seven change orders to QGS Development for the
golf course renovation totaling approximately $358,000, which were approved by the
Village Manager.
The Village's purchasing policy should be amended to address the required procedures
for change orders. We recommend that all proposed change orders be approved by the
Village engineer (if involved in the project), the Department Head overseeing the project
and the Village Manager. Consideration should be given to setting some cumulative
threshold, whereby the Village Manager can approve smaller change orders for
expediency purposes, although the Village Council would still be notified of any such
change orders. This threshold might be set at the lower of some percentage of the total
project (maybe 10%) or some dollar amount (maybe $10,000), subject to the change being
within the original scope of the project and such that the change order amount would
not exceed the original budget line item for the project. All other change orders would
be approved by the Village Council.
"Piggyback" Bids
The Village's purchasing policy allows management to "piggyback" on other state and
local government contracts for labor and materials. There are instances when these
contracts are not necessarily the least expensive way to purchase an item. We
recommend that the Village obtain one verbal quote when using the "piggyback"
purchasing provision to see if the "piggyback" quote is reasonable. If the verbal quote is
significantly lower, staff should go through the normal purchasing/bidding procedures.
The verbal quote should be documented and included as part of the backup for the
purchase. This would ensure that the Village is making the best use of its money.
Purchasing Director
---- We--have--been--asked on several -occasions-whether- we felt -there- was- aneed-for the
Village to hire a purchasing director. While there are advantages and disadvantages to
having a centralized purchasing department within an organization, the most important
consideration is whether the benefit to having such a person or department would
exceed the corresponding costs. Considering the current size of the Village, we do not
believe that a purchasing director would be cost beneficial at this time.
This report is intended solely for the information of the Village Council, Audit
Committee and management of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
In closing, we would like to thank the Village staff that assisted with the development of
this report. We sincerely appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
~, ,
ems,, ~..~,
/~,Pit/'TNt.C,~
~ ~/.u.C, PA,
Apri126, 2007