Loading...
07-17-2002 VC SP-MMINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SESSION • OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA HELD WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2002 ]'resent: Dr. Edward M. Eissey, Mayor Donald G. Noel, Vice Mayor Charles R. O'Meilia, Councilman David B. Norris, Councilman Dennis W. Kelly, Village Manager Kathleen F. Kelly, CMC, Village Clerk Absent: Joseph A. Tringali, President Pro Tem George Baldwin, Village Attorney ROLL CALL: Mayor Eissey called the Special meeting to order at 6:21 p.m. All members of Council were present except President Pro Tem Tringali, who was absent due to illness. All members of staff were present except Village Attorney George Baldwin- PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL SESSION "I he purpose of the Special Session was to accept or reject recommendations of the Special Master and to resolve all disputed impasse issues concerning the International Association of Firefighters (]AFF) Collective Bargaining Agreement. During discussion, James Cherof, Labor Counsel for the Village Manager, stated that the contract period would be from the date of ratification through the end of the Fiscal Year. He further staled that under the Statute, if impasse was resolved but neither party signed and ratified it, then the contract would be subject to being imposed by the Council for the first fiscal year that the contract was negotiated, which would be 1998-99 Fiscal Year. So in either case, he added, not much is accomplished and the Council would be back to bargaining a new contract. It was clarified that the disciplinary appeals refers to two categories of discipline; anything more severe than a 24-hour suspension without pay or anything less than 24 hours. The contract covers all ranges of discipline, but are broken into those two categories. Matthew J. Mierzwa, Jr., Labor Counsel for the Professional Firefighters/Paramedics of Palm Beach County, Local 2928 (IAFF), responded with his own interpretation of the Statute. He staled that what the Council, as the legislative body, resolves to do in this matter is combined with what has already been agreed to and all are required to sign it. Then it is submitted for ratification. If ratified by both parties, it is a contract. If not ratified by the Union, then the portion that is resolved now by the Council is effective for the remainder of the first fiscal year • subject to negotiations, which is 1998-99. Mr. Mierzwa further explained that the effective date Minutes of Special Session I Icld Wednesday, July 17, 2002 • can be whatever date the Council desires, including a retroactive date. Once the Council makes its decision, if it is not ratified, the date of the Council's decision will be the effective date. It was clarified that the only issues before the Council at this time are the disciplinary issue and the issue of longevity pay. The effective date or the duration of the contract is not an issue that has gone through the process. The duration of the contract is not the same issue as the effective date of the longevity pay, since the Council can put whatever date they desire for the payment of longevity, if they decide to approve it. Mr. Mierzwa said that he and the union considers the contract year being negotiated at this time is 1998-99. Councilman Norris moved that no vote be taken until President Pro Tem Tringali has had the opportunity to review the tapes, after which the impasse issue will be voted on at the next available agenda. Vice Mayor Noel seconded the motion, and all present voted aye. AI).IOURNMGNT With no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m. l athleen P. Kelly, CMC Village Clerk • 2