Loading...
2009-46 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 09-01 Supporting DocumentsRESOLUTION 2009-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF • NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE DATA, ANALYSIS AND STUDIES SUPPORTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 09-01; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Village has initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 09-01, amending the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan to: (1) adopt Evaluation and Appraisal Report ("EAR") based amendments as required by Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes; (2) adopt amendments implementing the Village's Ten-Year 'Water Supply Facilities Work Plan as required by Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes; (3) adopt amendments to the Capital Improvements Element as required by Section 163.3177(3)bl, Florida Statutes; (4) adopt amendments relating to the U.S. Corridor Study for mixed use projects; and (5) adopt a new Annexation Element to the Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(8), Florida Statutes, requires that all elements of the Village's Comprehensive Plan be based upon appropriate data and analysis and that such data and analysis are not deemed part of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(8), Florida Statutes, further requires that studies, surveys and supporting documentation relating to the Village's Comprehensive Plan be made available for public copying and inspection; and WHEREAS, the Village Council wishes to formally adopt the data, analysis and studies supporting Comprehensive Plan Amendment 09-01 and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the interests of the health, safety and welfare of the residents and citizens of the Village ofNorth Palm Beach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are ratified as true and incorporated herein. Section 2. The Village Council of the Village of North Palm Beach hereby adopts the data, analysis and studies supporting Comprehensive Plan Amendment 09-01, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. All resolutions or parts of resolutions of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida, which are in conflict with this Resolution, are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF (Village Seal) • ATTEST: _._-- ~ ~ VILLAGE CLE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEQACH FLORIDA EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2009 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE Prepared For: Village of North Palm Beach Prepared By: Land Research Management, Inc. June 2009 RESOLUTION 2006-98 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE.PLAN OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH AND DECLARING THE VILLAGE'S INTENTION TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; APPROVING TRANSMITTAL OF THE REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COi41MUNITY AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the State of Florida mandates that all Iocal governments draft and adopt comprehensive development plans to provide thorough and consistent planning for real property located within their jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Community Affairs has determined that the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code; and WHEREAS, because local planning is intended to be a continuous and ongoing process, Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, directs each local government to adopt an evaluation and appraisal report assessing the local government's progress in implementing its comprehensive plan and ensuring that the plan provides appropriate policy guidelines for future growth and development; and WHEREAS, the Village ofNorth Palm Beach's Local Planning Agency has reviewed the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," conducted an advertised public hearing, provided for public participation and rendered its recommendations to the Village Council; and WHEREAS, the Village Council has reviewed the Evaluation and Appraisal Report and has conducted an advertised public hearing as required by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA as follows: Section 1. The Village Council hereby adopts the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the Village ofNorth Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The Village Council hereby approves transmittal of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report to the Department of Community Affairs for the purpose of a sufficiency review in accordance with Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 3. All resolutions or parts of resolutions of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida, which are in conflict with this Resolution, are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of the Resolution. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 30~' DAY OF NOVEMBER. 200b. {Village Seal) ATTEST: _ r~ ~~ Villa a Clerk RESOLUTION 2007-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING PHASE ONE OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY ONE CORRIDOR STUDY PREPARED BY LAND RESEARCH •MANAGEMENT AND TERMINATING THE ZONING IN PROGRESS RELATING TO .REZONING REQUESTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR; PROVIDING FOR SEVERAHILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on February 8, 2007, through the adoption of Resolution 2007-25, the Village Council retained Land Research Management, Inc. to perform a three phase Planning Study to implement the directives of the recently adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report and to examine potential redevelopment along the U.S. Highway One corridor; and WHEREAS, the Village Council also declared a limited zoning in progress applicable to rezoning requests along the U.S. Highway One Corridor until Phase One of the Planning Study, which included consideration of which properties or segments along U.S. Highway One would be appropriate for mixed use and/or residential development, was complete; and WHEREAS, the Village Counci3 wishes to formally approve and accept Phase One of the Planning Study and terminate the zoning in progress. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA as follows: ection 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and incorporated herein. Section 2. The Village Council hereby approves and accepts Phase One of the U.S. Highway One Corridor Planning Study prepared by Land Research Management, Inc. and the conclusions and recommendations set forth therein. ' Section 3. The Village Council hereby terminates the zoning in progress relating to final decisions on applications for rezoning of property to permit residential or mixed use development along the U. S. Highway One corridor. Section 4. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to he unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of this Resolution. Section 5. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS nth DAY OF AUGUST, 007. (Village Seal),~~ ,- MAYOR ATTEST' ' 36 . :• . ,~ ~, eP ~~ VILLAGE CLE RESOLUTION 2007-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE AGREEMENT WITH LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT FOR THE U.S. HIGHWAY ONE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY TO CHANGE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR PHASE TWO; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ,. • WHEREAS, the Village Council retained Land Research Management, Inc. to perform a three phase planning study to implement the directives of the recently adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Repart and to examine the potential redevelopment along the U.S. Highway One corridor; and WHEREAS, Land Research Management completed phase one of the study, the results of which were accepted by the Village Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended certain changes to the Scope of Services for phase two and the Village Council wishes to amend the agreement with Land Research Management to incorporate these recommendations. WHEREAS, the Village Council determines that such action in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and incorporated herein. Section 2. The Village Council hereby approves an Amendment to the Agreement for Planning Services with Land Research Management relating to khe U.S. Highway One corridor revising the scope of services for phase two. The Council further authorizes the Mayor and Village Clerk to execute the Amendment to the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, on behalf of the Village. Section 3. Al( resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF . , ,; {Village Seal)`., . •)e: ,, , ATTEST: ., - ~,.... AUGUST 007. r MAY R VILLAGE CLERK ,P~>ytrl~MENT TO AGR~CEiYtE1~iT FOR PLAIdP11fP1G ~EI~VICE~ THTS AMENp1viCNT is made as of thisday of August, 2007, by and between the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation (" Village") and Land Research Management, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Consultant"), RECITALS Vl+HiCREAg, the Village and Consultant entered into apt Agreement for Planning Services dated 02/0812007 (Resolution 2007.25) to implement a three phase planning study to examine potential redevelopment along the U.S.1:Tighway One corridor ("Agreement"); and V~HEREAS, the Agreement incorporated a Scope of Services dated lanuaiy ] 0, 2007 detailing three separate phases; and VNHI$REAS, the Consultant has completed Phase One of the study, as set forth in the Scope of Services, and the Village and the Consultant wish to modify the Scope of Services for Phase Two. I~OV~, T)EH;REFORE, i~t consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 3ECTIO141 1: The parties hereby amend Phase Two of the Scope of Services, which was incorporated into the Agreement by reference, to rend as follows: Phase 2 Examine existing conditions, rcgnlations and inconsistencies and mnnice recommendations. Task 2.1- Complete a survey of vacancy rates along the corridor. Task 2.2 - Evaluate whether or not building height limitations need to be revised in order to encourage the construction of "Class A" office buildings. Task 2,3 - Review setback requirements for four story buildings adjacent to residential areas. Task 2.4 - Evaluate properties zoned C© to determine if the current height limits are appropriate. Task 2.S - laeternune whether or not there are any inconsistencies between the Phase One recommendations and existing development and, if such inconsistencies exist, make recommendations to address them. ;SECTION 2: All other provisions of the Agreement for Plaru~ing Services, to the extent not modified herein, remain in full force and effect. 'Phis Amendment shall not increase the Cost to Complete the Scope of Services as set forth therein. TN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Amendment to Agreement for Planning Services as of the day and year first above written. Land I~eQearsh fi/Iaitageme~t, Inc. BY: ~ J P. FLEISCH VTC RES]DEN'r VI.L,Y.AGE OP i~FO1i;T)FI PAM ~EACI~ r BY: i7R. D ARD I SE ,MAYO ,~ ,~.,~,~, ,. .~' '~ Al l EST: .. ~_ BY;` ME SSA TEAL, VILLAGE CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFF.iC1ENCY BY: ViI:LAGE AT7'ORN);Y • RESOLUTION 2008-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA ADOPTING THE VILLAGE'S TEN- YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN AND DIRECTING VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY AMENDMENTS TO INCORPORATE THE WORK PLAN 1NT0 THE VILLAGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, requires that local governments coordinate appropriate aspects of their comprehensive plans with the appropriate water management district's regional water supply plan and ensure that the future land use plan is based upon the availability of adequate water supplies and public facilities and services; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3177(6), Florida Statutes, further requires that local governments subject to a regional water supply plan include in their comprehensive plan a water supply facilities work plan, spanning at least a 10 yeaz period, that identifies any alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply projects, bulk sale agreements and eonservation/reuse programs necessary to meet current and future water use demands within the government's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Village of North Palm Beach is subject to the regional water supply plan adopted by the South Florida Water Management District on February 15, 2007; and WHEREAS, in cooperation and coordination with Seacoast Utility Authority, the Village of North Palm Beach has initiated and carefully prepazed a Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, including proposed amendments to the Village afNorth Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Village Council desires to adopt the Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and related comprehensive plan amendments to guide and control future Village development and to preserve and protect the public health, safety and welfare ofthe residents of North Palm Beach. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals aze ratified as true and incorporated herein. Section 2. The Village Council hereby adopts the Village of North Palm Beach Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, including the data and analysis and recommended amendments to the Village Comprehensive Plan set forth therein, A copy ofthe Water Supply Facilities Work Plan is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. r~ Section 3. The Village Council directs Village Adnunistration to prepare the necessary amendments to the Village Comprehensive Plan, as directed in the Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, for adoption in accordance with the requirements of Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-11 of the Florida Administrative Code. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF 1ULY. 2008. (Vii~age Se~~, ~'<, MAY . ~, ATTF~ST: ,..~'~, VILLAGE CLE • Table of Contents Chapter Page Summary of EAR-Based Amendments A. General EAR Recommendations B. Element-By-Element Recommendations Future Land Use Element 2 Transportation Element 5 Housing Element 6 Infrastructure Element 8 Coastal Management Element 8 Conservation Element 9 Recreation and Open Space Element 10 Intergovernmental Coordination Element 11 Capital Improvements Element 12 Public School Concurrency Element 13 Annexation Element 13 C. Additional Statutory Requirements 14 List of Appendices Appendix 1 -Affordable Housing Assessment Appendix 2 -10-Year Potable Water Supply Facilities Plan Appendix 3 -Capital Improvements Element Update Summary of EAR-Based Amendments A. GENERAL EAR RECOMMENDATIONS The original Comprehensive Plan was written in 1989 and an EAR-based amendment was completed in 2001. Therefore, the format and content is generally in good condition. However, the following general items have been incorporated within the EAR-based amendments to insure consistency with current comprehensive planning requirements. Each action is in response to an EAR-based directive: • EAR directive: Update the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate new 5-year and 10-year planning periods. Action: Section 1.5 of Chapter 1 has been added to define the Short-range (FY 2009 - 2013) and Long-term (FY 2014 - 2018) planning periods. • EAR directive: The newly enacted comprehensive planning requirements of Senate Bill 360, as~discussed in Section 2.1.6 of the EAR should be incorporated within the Comprehensive Plan. Action: The Capital Improvements Element update was completed in March 2006, and related amendments, including the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements, have been incorporated within the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. • EAR Directive: Density and intensity standards for alf of the future land use categories should be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan during the EAR-based amendment process. Action: An intensity standard for the Conservation land use category has been incorporated within revised Policy 1.A.4 of the Future Land Use Element, and Objective ?.8 has been added to the Future Land Use Element defining intensity standards for mixed-use developments. B. ELEMENT-BY-ELEMENT EAR DIRECTIVES Specific EAR recommendations for each Comprehensive Plan element are summarized below. Elements are discussed in the order in which they appear in the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Recommendations are generated by analysis completed in the various EAR chapters, as follows: (1) Analysis of major issues; (2) Communitywide assessment; (3) Changes to State statutory requirements; and (4) Changes to State administrative code requirements. 1 Future Land Use Element The Future Land Use element has been amended based upon the following EAR direction. A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • EAR Directive: Add an objective and related policies encouraging redevelopment along the U.S. Highway 1 and Northlake Boulevard corridors (New objective). Action: Objective 6 and Policies 6.1. and 6.2 have been added to the Future Land Use Element. • EAR Directive: Add density and intensity standards for mixed-use redevelopment within Policy 1.4. .Action: New Objective 1.B and Policy 1.8.1 have been added to the Future Land Use Element. • EAR Directive: Amend the Future Land Use Map Series to include overlay maps, including the NBOZ, that identify areas where redevelopment proposals will be considered by the Village. Action: Policy 6.1, Section 3.5.4 and Figure 3-8 have been added to the Future Land Use Element identifying the NBOZ. • EAR Directive: Consider the need to add Special Policies to Objective 5 to address more localized redevelopment issues such as use and compatibility with adjacent land uses. Action: Height limitations for mixed-use development and redevelopment activities along U. S. Highway 1 have been included in new Policy 1.B.1 as a means of assuring compatibility with adjacent land uses. No additional policies are necessary at this time. EAR Directive: Special Policy 1.9 should be deleted and incorporated within the proposed Annexation element. Action: Special Policy has been deleted and added to the new Annexation Element as Policy 13.3.1. • EAR Directive: Figure 3-18 should be deleted and incorporated within the proposed Annexation element. 2 Action: Figure 3-18 has been deleted and added to the new Annexation Element as Figure 13-1. • EAR Directive: Prepare complete data and analysis to address the following issues and draft objectives and policies related to residential density, as appropriate. The need for Future Land Use element amendments to address the above issues will be determined upon completion of the above data and analysis tasks. Action: The U. S. Highway 1 Corridor Study (Phases 1 and 2) has been completed, addressing this issue. No other areas of the Village were considered for density increases at this time. • EAR Directive: Areas within the Village where increased density proposals will be considered. Action: Per the U. S. 1 Corridor Study, areas north of the Parker Bridge are appropriate for density increases from Medium to High Density. Bases upon this recommendation the Domani Parcel was granted a density increase via North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendment 07-2.1. • EAR Directive: Criteria for consideration of density increase proposals, by annexation area and sub-area, as illustrated on Map 2 of the EAR report. Action: The only specific policy language for the consideration of density increases in the Village Annexation Area is in Target Area 2, which is addressed by Policy 13.3.1 of the new Annexation Element. • EAR Directive: Determination of whether or not a new intermediate density residential Future Land Use category needs to be created. Action: It is determined that there is no need for an intermediate residential density category at this time. • EAR Directive: Residential density standards for the CPUD and C-3 Districts. Action: Residential development is permitted only as a component of a mixed-use development. Density standards have been incorporated as new Policy 18.1.4 and 1.B.2 of the Future Land Use Element. • EAR Directive: Determination of whether or not to revise the "PUD minimum parcel size. Action: It has been determined that there is no need to revise the PUD minimum parcel size at this time. 3 • EAR Directive: Density incentives to provide workforce housing alternatives within residential developments. Action: New Policy 1.B.2 has been incorporated within the Future Land Use Element. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • EAR Directive: Add a policy to Objective 3 stating that the Village should maintain and expand (i.e. to include all development orders permitting an increase in residential density) its current practice of updating population projections at the of Comprehensive Plan amendment approval. Action: New Policy 3.4 has been added to the Future Land Use Element. • EAR Directive: Amend the Future Land Use Map Series in Planning Areas 2 and 3B to indicate Public Buildings and Grounds land use for the Village Public Safety Department and North Sub-Station parcels. Action: The Future Land Use Map and Future Land Use Map Atlas (Maps 3, 5, and 8) have been revised to reflect their current Village-owned land uses (i.e. North Sub-Station -Map 3; Public Safety Department -Map 5, and Anchorage Park -Map 8). Locations of each of these properties are illustrated on Map 7 of this document. • EAR Directive: Amend Figure 3-17 of the Future Land Use Map Series to reflect the current definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area, as illustrated on Map 7 of this EAR report. Action: Revised Figure 3-7 is included in the Future Land Use Element. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix C of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Future Land Use Element. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). 4 Action: None required for the Future Land Use Element. Transportation Element The Village has updated the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate statutory requirements fora Transportation element. Additional proposed changes include, per EAR direction include: A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. EAR Directive: Add a policy to Objective 13 directing redevelopment proposals to provide for public transit access, connectivity among developments along the corridors, and additional opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle access from adjacent residential neighborhoods. Action: Policy 13.7 has been added to the Transportation Element. S. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. EAR Directive: Objective 1: (1) Revise and update the list of needed roadway improvements in the Village; (2) Revise Policy 1 to classify Village roadways according to the Florida Functional Highway Classification System; and (3) revise Policy 1.2 to delete daily traffic LOS standards and revise peak hour LOS volumes, including Tables 4-1 and 4- 2, to conform with those used in implementing the countywide Traffic Performance Standards ordinance. Action: Objective 1 has been revised to indicate roadway deficiencies/projects. Policy 1.1 has been revised to reflect the Florida Functional Highway Classification System Classification System. Policy 1.2 and Table 4-1, and Table 11-1 of the Capital Improvements Element have been revised to reflect consistency with the LOS standards used by Palm Beach County (peak-hour "D'). Table 4-2 has been deleted, as it is no longer appropriate since County LOS standards have been adopted. EAR Directive: Amend Objective 1, Policy 1.2 to conform to the County's LOS standard (i.e. Peak-Hour "D"). Action; Policy 1.2 has been amended appropriately. • EAR Directive: Objective 1, as well as the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements, should be updated to include those improvements in the County's 5-Year roadway improvement program, as well as those defined locally. Action: Objective 1 has been revised to indicate roadway deficiencies, including MPO projects. Table 11-3 of the Capital Improvements Element has been revised to list roadway projects, including FY 2009 - 2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) of the Metropolitan Planning Organization. • EAR Directive: Objective 2, as well as the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements, should be updated to reflect any projected long-term transportation capital improvements needs identified during the preparation of the EAR-based amendments. If none are identified, the objective will not be revised. Action: No capital improvements needs identified, per the Capital Improvements Element update. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix C of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Transportation Element. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Transportation Element. Housing Element The Housing element has been amended based upon the following EAR direction. A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • EAR Directive: Add a policy to Objective 3 encouraging mixed-use developments to contain alternative living accommodations such as lofts, second story apartments and live-work arrangements to facilitate the supply of workforce housing. Action: Policy 3.12 has been added to the Housing Element. 6 • EAR Directive: A policy should. be added to Objective 3 encouraging projects that have been granted a residential density increase to include a compliment of workforce housing. Action: Policy 3.14 has been added to the Housing Element. EAR Directive: Consider density and intensity increases above the standard (to be determined) as an incentive to provide workforce housing alternatives within residential or mixed-use developments along the U.S. Highway 1 and Northlake Boulevard corridors. Action: Policy 3.14 has been added to the Housing Element and related Policy 18.2 has been added to the Future Land Use Element providing for a density increase for workforce housing. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. EAR Directive: Policy 4.1 should be amended to indicate that code amendments providing for such facilities have been accomplished. Action: Policy 4.1 has been revised to reflect an ongoing policy. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • These recommendations are listed in Appendix C of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Housing Element. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). • EAR Directive: Data and analysis for the Housing Element must include a description of substandard housing units. The requirement that the housing inventory include a locally determined definition of standard and substandard housing is repealed. Action: Policy 1.2.b (housing condition definitions) of the Housing Element is retained, as definitions relate to the Standard Housing Code, which has been adopted and being enforced by the Village. The housing data and analysis contains a description of substandard units using Census data. The data will be updated at the time that the next affordable housing assessment is prepared. 7 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge (Infrastructure) Element A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • Water Supply Planning Requirements. Action; Amended Section 6.9 to incorporate the North Palm Beach Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by reference and amended Policy 7.7 to coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority in their potable water planning efforts. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Infrastructure Element. Coastal Management Element The Coastal Management element should be amended based upon the following EAR direction. A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. Consider adding a policy to Objective 3, or a Special Policy to Objective 5 of the Future Land Use element requiring redevelopment proposals that include an existing water-dependent recreational land use to retain such use. 8 Action: Added Policy 3.3 to the Coastal Management Element oriented to retaining water-dependent land uses. • Consider density and intensity increases above the standard (to be determined) for redevelopment proposals which contain an existing water- dependent recreational land use. Actiona Added Policy 3.3 to the Coastal Management Element oriented to the consideration of increased land use intensities in redevelopment proposals, via special exception or variance processes that include retaining existing water-dependent land uses. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • Objective 5 should be amended to reflect the Village's participation in the Revised Unified Local Mitigation Strategy Plan (LMS Plan), as well as any direction provided by local hurricane preparedness plans. Action: Added Policy 5.4 to reflect the Village's participation in the program. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • Revise the definition of Coastal High Hazard Area (CCHA). Action: Revised ®bjective 6 of the Coastal Management Element to incorporate the revised definition of the CCHA and reference Figure 3-7 of the Future Land Use Element (CCHA Map). D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in .Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Actions None required for the Coastal Management Element. Conservation Element The Conservation element should be amended based upon the following EAR direction. A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • No amendments directed by the EAR. 9 Action: No action taken. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • Water Supply Planning Requirements. Action: Amended Section 8.1 to incorporate the North Palm Beach Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan by reference and added Objective 8 and Policies 8.1 _ 8.3 to coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority in developing and implementing its potable water conservation programs. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Conservation Element. Recreation and Open Space Element The Recreation and Open Space element should be amended based upon the following EAR direction. A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. 10 • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Recreation and Open Space Element. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Recreation and Open Space Element. Intergovernmental Coordination Elementl The Intergovernmental Coordination Element should be amended based upon the following .EAR direction: B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • .Policies in Objectives 2 - 4 should be updated to reflect current conditions. Action: Objectives 2 - 4 and supportive policies have been administratively revised, as necessary to reflect current conditions. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements • Water Supply Planning Requirements. Action: Added Policy 1.15 requiring that applicants for a development approval procure written confirmation of potable water availability prior to issuance of a building permit and added Policy 4.5 requiring that, at the time of each required EAR, the Village confirm the availability of potable water supply consistent with Seacoast Utility Authority and Palm Beach County water supply plans. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. 11 Capital Improvements Element The Capital Improvements Element should be amended based upon the following EAR direction: B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • Policy 4.2 of the Capital Improvements element limits general obligation debt to an amount equal to 5% or less of the Village's property tax base. Asa .result of the dramatic increase in tax base, this policy should be reviewed to determine whether or not it remains reasonable. Action: Due to the dramatic decline in property values since the preparation of the EAR, the Village has decided not to decrease the percentage rate in Policy 4.2 at this time. The Village should prepare an updated 5 year Schedule of Improvements (short-term), as well as a 10 year (long-range) improvements plan considering the maintenance of level-of-service (LOS) standards, detailed revenue projections and changes in funding in order to adequately determine financial feasibility. Action: The Village has completed the required Capital Improvements Element update and incorporated the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements (Ref.• Tables 11-2 to 11-4) within the Comprehensive Plan. As a ten-year improvements plan is not required by state statute, the Village has opted not to prepare one at this time. The Village's Capital Improvement element and 5-year schedule of improvements should be amended to comply with the .additional requirements of the 2005 Growth Management Legislation (Senate Bill 360). Action: Added Policies 3.4 to 3.6, revised Policies 4.3 and 7.1.1, updated Sections 11.4.1, 11.4.2, and 11.4.3, and added Tables 11-2 to 11-4 of the Capital Improvements Element to comply with Senate Bill 360 requirements. Delete Table 11.-2.B -School District of Palm Beach County Six-Year Capital Improvements Schedule. .Add policy 1.15 directing the Village to retain the School District schedule of improvements on file. Action: Table 11-2.8 has been deleted. Further, the School District 5-Year Capital Budget is adopted by reference (Ref.• Table 11-2) in the 2009 Support Documentation for the ClE update. 12 Public School Concurrency Element Table 12-1 has been deleted, as tiered level-of-service standards are no longer being used by the School District. Further, the Public School Concurrency Map Series (Ref: Table 12-2 and Figures 12-1 - 12-3) are revised to reflect the School District's current map series. No additional amendments are directed by the EAR. Annexation Element (Proposed New Element) A. Recommendations based upon the description and analysis of major issues. • Prepare data and analysis to support the proposed element. Action: Necessary data and analysis is presented in Section 1: Issue 1 of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. • Prepare objectives and policies to address annexation issues and incorporate a framework for the annexation program. Action: Added Element 13.0 Annexation to the Comprehensive Plan, including maps of the Annexation Area (Ref.• Figures 13-1 and 13-2) and goal, objectives and policies statements. • Prepare objectives and policies to direct coordination efforts with Palm Beach Gardens and Palm Beach County in disputed areas. Action: Added Policy 13.3.2 and Objective 13.4.1 to coordinate with Palm Beach Gardens and Palm Beach County. • Prepare a methodology for the preliminary .review and evaluation of annexation proposals. Action; Added Objective 13.4 to guide the review of annexation proposals. • Incorporate Figure 3-18 of the Future Land Use Element to the Annexation element. Action: Figure 3-18 has been deleted from the Future Land Use Element and added as Figure 13-1 of the Annexation Element. • Incorporate Policy 1.9 of the Future Land Use element to the Annexation element. Action; Policy 1.9 has been deleted from the Future Land Use Element and added as Policy 13.3.1 of the Annexation Element. 13 • Prepare maps defining annexation target areas. Action: The Annexation `Target Area map has been incorporated within the Annexation Element as Figure 73-2. B. Recommendations based upon the communitywide assessment. • No amendments directed by the EAR. Action: No action taken. C. Recommendations based upon changes to State statutory requirements. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Annexation Element. D. Recommendations based upon changes to State Administrative Code requirements for comprehensive plans. • EAR Directive: These recommendations are listed in Appendix D of the EAR and reflect new Comprehensive Plan requirements since the date of the last EAR (1999). Action: None required for the Annexation .Element. C. ADDITIONAL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Since the Village adopted the EAR (December 2006), there have been additional statutory amendments adopted by the Florida legislature relating to comprehensive plan requirements. A summary of the statutory amendments, commencing in 2006, including statements as to where the requirements are addressed in the proposed EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan update, are presented in Table 1. 14 N d L .~ N~ N P ~ W ~ py~ ~ W ~ ~L 0 c 0 a N Q V..~ s ~. 0 a as c U .Q Q Q O Z Z 'mod '' ~O v, c ~cc - m ~, ~ ~ ~ Q ¢ z° _ w mW ' z z z z z a ~ -m ~ e C N ......R.~.. ~n ~ - - O O- O a Y ~ EJ Cn ~ y C7 ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~~~ c N L Q Q O ~ O ~ tO C O y i d ~•~ y z z ..-. p, z .Y z t0 ~O ~ ~-] ~ W ~ ~•~3 O O ~?::•?~ ul U N ~ ('~l •-- N ~Q ~ .O iT R C N O ld V] O tO ~ ~: Z _ : 'RO . ~. Z z z Q w ~ a R m o 3 z a ~, ~ 3 N Z _ (V ~ `N.. LL 0= 0 -~, r. y ~ Z (h rn .~ - 'a ... ~ .~ m w;= ,~ a U, r a N m d' m h h h r~ ti ti W ~ 00 ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ M M M M M M M ry U" CM M cM M C J M M O r N (O CO f0 (O (O v (O (O a f0 - Ql !. •V a • N V7 O LL L O C ~ • ~ Y-. ~ LL O M V' N + E N i O a t ~ N W (O O LL M ~l") 3 fL a N 3 O M ~ d X~ O N ~ C 3 N Q NO L O .... - N -~ T R J 'C f0 (M R N d A ~ O) C ~ .. .. N O LL ~ U O w J ': f0 N t O r U ~ N ~ N ~ Q ~ 3 O L V _ 3 J ~ r ~ vi ~ ~ m ~;; N c i c a m E vi y ~ ~ ~ ., .~ rn n m °-- m o M ~ w ~ ~ a u. J n ,~ N~o ~u- O ~c r3n a~E ~= W J N LL N p O ~O N N r ~= U N a R R a O C fQ U ~O J O_ ~ N Q N O W ..r 2 ~ V A ~ M u y:. T L ~ O ~ ~ . 47_ N y O (Q QN O~J N Q t ~~ O J ; a N 7 T O U N J N ~: d ~~ ~ N 'C CO O 7 . ~ _ U ~ `O - C d O tf1 t N ~ N N t0 ~~ ~ _ 3 R C 3 0 O N N 9 Q L O R ~ , LL O (~ 3 O c- J M r' ~ O t 4 U N N a N N VJ (O O~ m` _ C O ~ r - ) N .- N " '' N N t0 ~ t U w N p 2 T V~ ~ .Qy .a y y N ~ ~ ~ . .O ? W h N N _ L N ~ ~ N C N U S d N t0 N N n i t U h N . fD c R a C M o U ~. Y L d f0 N ' Q c U ~ L C s ~ U m s Q (~ :..V1 n N N J - a N < ~ R N N O U O O d O f6 . LL ~~ C1 C .. p N N ~A O N 7 U O a1 Q U N 16 .fl N ~ a f0 R m ~ ' R N L n ~- N M N N M N ~ U a 0. ~ O J RNC ot _ NC N C E~ N47 r 'a . ~ w0 ~ - ll') ~D N r L " C N R ~ O 3 ~ (6 f~ f6 7 N G. 2 O O ' ~ h (n O ~ tD - N ' fE _ ~ - N O O N 6 G C C p N S N + + ll. O ID N ~ t ~ cD t .. !n r ~ t U N N ~ + . ~ Nw`- l6 ( O)3 O ~ t6 w+ ~C N Q O a N J ~" ~ W W N N ~- ~ O ~~ N C d i d ~ R S N U N V" O ~ W .. M r O M V -p l1j N ~ N 7 V .~.+ •> N Q~ p U U la 01 O a+ 3 R p LL w. •C U O aL+ N r. O 19 ~p L U O p N m '~ O p N N cO N U ~ O R C U `t O V a C N J 2+ ~ C R N y •+ O ly0 N N J N 3 O Y f9 N N r - .` O t O "~ LL O ~.:. O ~ U C 7 C N N ~ fC 0 6] O U ~ O E y :. ., N C ~ N O N U G.. o w -~ t U ~ Q N _ ~ a ~ N C N C U C. _ ;~ M ~ J 3 R f6 f9 ~: ..•~O h N V! O ~ `~ N O N ? .C C N R a- R O ~ p' N O L ' d O 3 U O ~ /6 W V N N ~ L [O N J a f0 a LL ~ N O N Q~ t U. v- O ~ ~ to r U- ~ LL v O):. ~ O t6 O~ N. p ~ . . w r - U r ~ as N ch 0 O ""' T M N ~" a N -~ a O)`, C O d m N~ Q~ >, A'O ct C p ~ N LL LL ~ L rn R J ~. - N ~" N J R ~ N J ' ~ Q p N ~ T R. R~ U O_ O O) '~, r C R w w 3 U In = U ~ = U ~ ~c LL~ { .. ' ~ r N -p - N' ~ u i N ' ?~ C O C ~ d N (!~ N L 'j C ~ •C N ~ U ~~ N M N ?~ N ?~ J V ~ ~ i en N N ul r y t' C t6 t0 om O U D Q m -O R U N is ` L j~ N~ Q N N aL (n (/~ (!~ (n !n fC J fC J ~ N y N . N y N r - Ul N N O N O N h 1..1 Q O y 0 fV % O) a m U a O 2 Q `C ~ N a aD N a d. N t6 s •. ... a ., N .~..~- O r a N ;. O tD - to - M N .. r ~to r - N N 4i CO U L f6 .G +' N O ~ N N O O aR+ N C ~ r N N ~ N :r O N ~,.~ h ` ~ W O -N O N O h iA N . O" N r ~1i (D ~D U1 t U N N C N ~ d y ,,, . N~ C E O O] ~, U R C a N O rn:' t0 h O . . ~ O" N W M O C 1 r O (D h O CO T T O - p p O O ~ f~Q U ~ d1 ~ ~ L,L d ~ <0 ~ U L N ' mo ~ (6 ~ LL n W C N ~ d m '+ Q 01 T. N N -N N Ni N N OO - i O d Q1w L NO L L -C C C L L L - _ L L L L ' L _ r ~.~. ~- W LL O ~ R v= J Q ~ E fA Q O U N J V U Z Z Z U U U U U U U U U U (.~ U U U- ~= .-tD 00 h CO [O CO -T 07 O O r; ~ ! N T M O - ;a, O ~ O fD O h O 00 6'1 01~ - T O O r O N ~ O - ~ O f0 :O ~ V' t0 CO 1~ O a1 O - - , O O ~ -Q1 _ O O: QI T -T Ql T T O T " -O O "p O O. `. ~ ~ ~ ~ am r CO F _.~- -~ ~ - r r r.. r r r r ; N -N N N N- c -- c+t U .Q ^. Q O z Q Z c M a y. C C 7 ai Q) oc• o E (D w N m 0)w 4d E fu ac) aNi ac) `—° ¢ `—°iE _.+ a) — — — uaci:ail > Q g Q Z 0 Q a c y m N CD co U ] N Q Q1 O Mn Q Q O a) 0 0 - ®a z a` w z z a c 5 a _ r, E HNOR b y y w N W aN1`0), O O tC 5 N •`p 3d n. 'n W p°y y z z w z z z "tea 3 O O cl ° a M� -1 'do c OE co c _ 7 0 4` °° T°G' o _ �O r W U N Ma 4)O cOa PO W V3 Mfflm-mi= z z oLL z z °N. 3 3 Aso m v Cal C14 x z z ao ao 0 0 0 M Cl) M M M M M M 6)mm M M M M M M Cl) Cl) c0 (fl (fl O CO c0 O rfl Z z _ a) > a = m c E c' C 3 U C T C U (u t 0 0 Q!!) LL c () c 02 d i/i ° LL .Roo :0 co E.0 a) D c �!L)v my R E O Ov T C U R.�O a)� N a) 3Q R N N _j ° N R O U c=) 'N O� R 7 N N C °9 L R W e m E T ;r. R N C J 4; ..., a N'E N aR+ N +`� C9 a) a _ v E _ r r 0 >LL E� c) E E � m � N�' o o c o ° °o'S E aQi =_ °Q)m72- � 3� ;mac 3 ca ca N m �$ 0 ° Na E 02 N O s QC 2° ., a)S a U op V m Q N ° m u' a R R N 3 R N a) cu U p E.G co T: ` •- c 7 c6 7 a) (�_ a — .R+ a) N a) R a) T ca 9 a)L MR-M a-t RL°o� aci 2 a= cto m m N �'`� N o w ° '° E ° E -. mRr C) 7N EN CU ON E RcQQO a� NT Nc00 V) R a) N a) U R C a) n c as N w E(n 0 L r- E v- L >`O () u) >' N o4-- R R R N a) °OO i U ° N O R"r .fl O O LO O O a)' 7 N N 0 U O C Q O ° W rL Q a)N O 0 "'' O N O O cts a) .6 c U 4- N O N N a) R E .R.. U L c—° p- m R a) c ca L X a .•3 R R m N a) c N R o c U U N <0 3 °-rna) mR Ma oV o c —° pR ° o E � ° o ° O T R O c O U O 4= .L-I O N Q N N.E a) °O U e a in N O L v O.+L-'LL p Q m R >'c c _ c c E O N c'� p c y R c c cu 0 al C'�is N`gyp- a) "- 3�p, c j+O• m � ° =p U°+ R m N. N cy d R a a) R 0 2 Lam, .� 'a+ N C c a N Cap p O C CD O a p 4L Si E °°L Q 846 p co g ca E Em Q. N R"' ca ', cc ° N y2 � o N a �ca)'io E Na ° 0C" cu ° N V'a Q 7= 7 R m +`+ 0 V o V U a)a O c'Cu C O a) E ui : sue E c c m N °.0 LL crd v Q y. a)aa) >�-'0 oa >,- E ac): 3 E v R (D O N a`ni •�.,LO., ` r �_L" m a o cRi an d °N m w 'in C U E J lC: E °.L._ _ Y v-- >'R O V L N O""' N t6 C.0 a C R Q) N C L. O O >'N N a) Z+° a O C Q tfJ J N +`' O O p Oc U ° Q E Q) O WHIM V' OI;N'OOm HOC cc a) o Oc U Na)„°_ 3� o : CX RCE N; N Z U) N G).2 0 O N d p N a) CO �p Q a) C N c a) R ti 7 E 0•� R s E' 7 R O N N d >,N a> c0 O) R �= v ° `� E C 0. C.- O)N O L) y C.L.+ co C0 O) O= °.N N u) C 3 = R a) R CO Q a R Cl ca a °a) R Q c(6 L R•° V O Q N Op R a;Q 5 _LR N C+•' G 7 a) O0a- 0 a) C+' U !� O r ?� cL C1 N y (R6 m c L >C r+ O "O O E O V �,=t.'- d(a R S w" c a)O 47 a) L 7 Q X p 0 U N R t S R E a.N c R V 'a ca�°•°- N 3 6') E a,J d E co U a) c ° N N N a) Q U•` V N to N o_R a) r io > c(a N o r- c W N Q. '� 'O p V N'd 2 c a) L ° a 0 0 :3 - - ;• c C d 0._ c L~ (O Q L O c a)'i R 7° R C U7 O R'O_N Iv MEE O Q C•@ p O M O a O R N O U X a) O Ca O C N f Q a)w CU•_ L O N 3 N f6 w= CD- ° R ° ccMp °)�° = E oaXi ° N'a�? R ` �Ju) c00 ��°= So2EoN_cr, V N c N y r LL U C N R..N. M O LL N R U N Q E 0 R W R t Q 3 L (0 N > - ui 0 L N N `o .T c m E �. o c`"-U U Inn.- , N N L O S N c J °°U a) m N N N O R C — N N N R c C C l�C R O 2 N ° J a c` N c E c ca N a0 N G a0 w N N N N O N N J= U) O O N N 3 N R m N �"p O R a1 R a R N N CJ y 0 N N rn E p c0 NIL (a' O O R:0 E c E 7E c c+o - Q ° v ��L� vOUO 6EN _oo � �' a—)oma`mER�N a�°irna E�� °� � oR O' a ° � ' a ° E° and - Q UE �c°�Um� Sa)0UU4) aC) ua)iaai�m '`o Z - - - Q L) L O Q C Q N !Y a)r ti Q io (D r c`np T (0 °t° CD z a ~'. ~d ~N °' O'0.:9.y U • ~O~C ~ o a =pa ~ Q ~° ~~v-as ~..~G~W Z a i rn ~~ = Q.. ,~"p~m N~C~ o iiE`'"`:0~' d ~:~~`g Q ~,' a~~ duo ~(/1=~ ~N /~~ w V y w~ w"~~`sL_ V1 y is-~&~~d M GC ~~t ~ ~ 0 - - e -_ ~~ . a. p ~ ~. ~ ' ~.~ z :m -- :~~ Wiz:: ~~~: w . =~ : emu;: Q e~~ p ~q~n }, +. N . ~• ~a r~± m~~ ~ n ~ .mmV ~fh ,~a^ CO ~,,,~ ~ ~ ' C O ~ O Q >' °~~_ ~ - O ~ 0 0 0 O E .C Q_J N:;imi:n ~ C O O O o == __ _ N -O f6 " ~ +. C O N N _ _ - ____ ~ t~ -O C ~ "~ "J C ~ NaN _~__ - -- C N t N N QU' CL : _ ~ a a~ m m•mU ~ spa= ~ ry N ~p L N U Q _ AN: O U T (4 fD O VJ _ .__~9~ 0 l6 N T N N U U C ~ _ ~ ~~~: ry C N Q ~ , „ -~ . = y ~a ,~ ~- _ O fn N '~'~~~. ~ .Q N Q (6 ~'~ ° = ~ N v - -`~.t. O ~ w f0 N C C C _'.m.~oV. ~ , C •C1 O ~ N ~ C ~ _ ~ ~ 7 V N "- r C y~ ~O ° ~fq: ~d~: a ~ ~ ~ ~ W - w QOM O ~g14- ~t C O L.L C ~ O ~ t6 O ~ i • - - c 'C ~ c v ~ o m o c _ = ~ o N a ~ a.~ 'y , ~ ~ Y ~ U _ - .. N . .. ""V- Q' _ _ O O N V a~=ocm -- - x W ~ ;o a~ ~ t cu co m rn ~ " N c~ m `a ~- ' v o ~,a m - ~ ~r U .Q Q Q O Z Q Z .~n~a u, ~:aa,e ~d ~; sue' y e ~ O O C da v M ~ ~~•0: =0t::~ N m E N O .- o o v d w wuf~ W ' ~ N Q Q O C O ~ am ~t uC~,~ U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ b N °-~E°e° ~ ~~a ~i~' o _ a ® =- ffi ~ c ._~~ v ~ ~ m.,.,,u~ ~ap~3 ~ °? a W d=a ~,'=N?~ £ O ~ cn ~ mm.W; ~- ~~ ~ N ¢ d ' V °' Q ' Q N ~ ; u m z z z z z "~~ aL• a - o Fl M ~~r ~ V - °°~ a° y~a. - ~~Z- s: ~o ..®, ~=:;;.gin ~~ ~ :_ ~ ~,:_:~:c ~T =w ~ = - ` c`e~; ~ r` -~, ~ •~m~ ~ U M r~ N N ~ .u ~s~ co Z z ~,r. ~, _ p N = ~ 9 .i= --•, a, L to f0 O N N KN+ L C = a 0 O •y N N N VI 7 N :n:n U ___- _- .L.+ ~` C U •N-. C C E.~O .U NwL O)Q'C 'O O LJ O _ - ~ • Q ~ C ~ . U U ~ N N to c~ ~ O ~ ~N ~ ~ L __ _ .~m°..;~s; ~ O Q. N C ~.. Q ~ w [6 ~ C O ;~;~ 'mom ~ ~ o ~ • ° a.°o O u~ ~ o ~ ~ 'c N ~ a -- _m N ~ + j O_ "d E N E N O O E O O N .Q O Q ~ .G N - _ ~ N U VI •~ U C • O C _ 3 O O' ~ ~ N ~ U _- a O y6 ~ 'Q ~ C to a ~ ~ d ~ ~ O ~ ~ -° _ = `mom ~ c ~ rn U Q°cm m a aam~~iu cmNOf~-N c v ma i y oo =a~s~~ C: 3 ~' C L 'F'' m O (6 ~ .'C.+ C O.' N C N O CO ~p O m c __ C --~EnIC: r~ C ~ C ~ to O ~ w N "O 7 N p~ C O ~ N 'O 00 ~ C ;C O 7 --f N C •_ _ _'='~CO: ~~~ O N c ~ ` fa ~ .FL+ sou C N C in c m , t6 :~ C C LL ~ cy-°cn 3p ~ CO m°' N +O+ o-a ~K-~.a, 'm rn c - ~ • O ~ m of v v f6 cMO ° -~ ° t` rn -,~as(/~• ~~ 7~ p O ' ~ J V y ~~~ O N C .N^.. ~- C d: ^ N O N N O C N N.L. "acne: N G E O C R } L1N C A N N 0 > r , ~ NON O.L..a~ O 0.4- O -- = u~, ~ C d > •+L-' O y N N ~ N O O ~ U ~ O C OQ 'O N C ( y • ~o o~ ° ~ 4; c•o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w in ~°° vv ~ ~ m orf o ~ m ~ c m• •~a ~N _- ~y0. s o' N L d: ~ O aao f2 0 p y p c L= ~ M. c U m m ~ O •C ~ o V f2 -_ I~ m Uo w rn N G Boa N N N a U ~.,.. ca m•- O" d Q N ~ L ~ rna~ c U • C~ -_ ~ moo °- N ~~!~ l 0 mow oa~s E3N fA C ~ c6 o ~ _ ~ a o L C ' N ~ O d 0 N O w a c c 7 ~~ N N - -- -_ - - C v= O U •L«, N - U 7 N N N +L.+ y wL-+ ~. L7 ..O-. i. cif N ~ O N C N •_ r a _ - w cin ~ ~0 y ".'v c ~ m o'm:.°_ c ~ y 3 a i ~ •~ cp ~ U cp c0 ~ O __ _ ~ O C C C C O. _- _ - _ cu °> v co ~ ~ ~ ~ O c a ~ c N rn o '~ '~ ~ of - o > ~ ,~ ~ ~ _ -° -- U O).~ N O Q~ O M U O d. v Q~ _~ Q, N N M ~ L L 3 - ~~ d ~ ~ . ..N N ~NwN . ...~'O ~ Q~ ~ ~ 3 ~L =m _ - N h m l6 f'~ sz Q Q Z Q Z u~~~; mud,; ~~ ~a~ ~:::0 nc ~~~.~:y~ <a mom . ~ ~a a g a a ¢ a ¢ ¢ g ~_-~=' ~~~d;.~. z z z z z z z z z ~ ma~m ~=c mm~; - ~E~„ ~Ra< ®,_ ~~~3, ~~~d~o. N' . a. ~ .,,~N~y~~ =~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ Q Q ~~L u~~' yy H ~ yy H r~ F-i y y_ F ~ryj H y ~ ~ yy H ~~a- d w~~~ a'3- ^~P g.-~a ~.~z ~~ V • m+o=. o u o ~'~~;a Z ~ °~~~~ ~d:,i+ ~ --,~_O~~V: 00 e0 t0 ~~ ~•~L~ M _ 3 _ 3 _ 3 M M ` _mC~~- CM .~~ ~ N Z N Z N Z CMO (MO ~~~ni `~~ ~' N V N O U U N O r N ~ f6 w N~ O *j C ~. O N O C O O~ N 9~y m ~°'_°, O U Q i" ~ '06 = O. N E N U U • T ..0. O N 'O _ .a.~.a.~.... N C C O U E ,~-, C O O R N O Ul ~ E C N T U N f6 n O tA C p L N N N = 7 ~e . Q :~~_ _a O O~ U .o O Q ' ` o O ~ 3~ y V O y m my ~~`~ rn2i o a~ a a Ruda ' -_~ '- ~ N A I6 O v Y N d N _= a m = me ~ o ~ ~ o ~u. v o > ~ a~ --- ~ o L "0 L C C U O Q p ~ OJ N O C A "6 f6 (D O °- . -- _ s ~:; O. ~ N (Q v N A ~ LL Q'C O C LL E N O U d: w O N ~ ~ ~N ~ U G. ~~ ~ • r N C _ .~ _~. ,O ~ ~ O O U O D U O O > c ~ O J c O N h O .O-~ L V O i~= o N ¢Q: ~ ~ U ~. .~ O l n O d 7 ca N - ~~i U ~ N 0I p~ C ~ C j0 N Q NN NN ~ ~ C O C+L.+`~t O U 7 _ -ern: ~ R ms's a~i~~r ` omo a~i.c o c `i.i O va~ m ~~ -°` ~ ~ ~ ~!~ 5~ o. v ~ O c mp :,~ aN w n U rn ~ ~ i J O C ~ ~ vi c ~ c ~ - °~~_ ~ f0 ~C Y 0 N QN ~ ~ ~ _ ~ • s ~ 01 3 ~ C c~ ''a X U N O = _-.z-~,s;'LL; ss ~ V • N U U 7~~ U a+ C V ~ C ~ ~ ~ t. UI C - 7 ~M~ ___ N ~ Q' O ~ C O O. f/1 N ~ d ~ h O. ~ ~ O L ~c, X N O f6 N N f6 N ~ y ~ 7 U N C O 0 0 ~~.-: ~ C m . ma w~~ N u, S O U y U= o y ~ w ~ i~~ n .~c ~~ _ w -_~R c c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ on a;~_n a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U ~~, m ~ c ~ a~O U~ _~„"' ~ N 3 tll i+ ~ N O f6 U 01 C (n y 'C _ ~ Vl "'~'~~°y.~: C f J w •O V E C 't N C O C " C U ~ .C '= U 'O ri ",~'-;•~y' =~-yap: O = 6 = a~ o L •3 ~ O' lp O- O ~ c. ~ ~ 'a . o, m E O ' ~ O N U C ~ O co U) Vl O C a~ •X .c $ '6 fO °o - ~G O ~ N O N ~ ~ ~ .~-. LO _ ~ ~ N ~ U Q ~ O O ~ ~ =O .~0.. N ~t ~:U '(6C )`00 ~U1 . . N Ca N o a AE O rn c C N ~ N a E v=M ui ~ O ~ f0 -_ -C YU ~ ~" n coiN ~a u~ a~ ~w ~ fl, m o m c~ E c N~ a~ ~ 3 0 o c m ui __ ®y"~` m U oEu- ~~ ~ >v ~c of o ° ti aim d~~~ ac -'~' "`Q~, _ N U~ OJ ~c i ~t- C _, -„ VI 0~ N E Q ~ ~ N p) O~ O N ~ c6 - - -= - ~ w N d~ ~ c N 3 ~ ._ ~ v a c v ca t0 m U Q o m E _ _ '_ =- N ~ N _ O V N T N E U c ~ f6 N ~ ~ ¢ N a~ ~ O N m N O 30 U N O c ° c L __ -- - Q- X ¢ = O aai a°'ir --E m a Q•O U n V ~.N ' ~ c f9 p 0 ~ M - vw o N O O m _ Q- U ~ e - - - ~ fl N O O N ~ O d ~ y a a O d 4; ~ ~ 0 N Q N N ~ ~ = t6 2i _ __. L.L ~ . ~ U x ~ ~ N ~ N v N O N M ~ c CO = L ° I~ t • O "O ~ N LL m ~ O 'C v ; u~ ~ d: ma i ~oU ~ Y w ~I1 ~ ~ ~. ; U ~ 3 ~ Q Q Q ;; ; - ° M r '7 r ~ r (0 U .Q Q Q O Z ~_ `yam rn~;;m~ 3 ~_N~3 ' ~ ~o c ar te ` > > '~ ° c ~ > v ~ o m ~; ~ ~ c ~a a ~'~~- Z Z Z Z Z Z o s o Z ~°=E~~ o v a `? v 'S m~ m ~ .. L~~~~m' 07 ~ C O N Q N~ J Q ~ N Q C O C N tp N O N d=~ ~ O nN N~ 3 O T o_oo N ~c~ 3~? 3 Q'~r ~ w n. wa z a s LLrcn zn. z em=u s. bCC b 3 `^ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ `"• ~ ~ ~ N ... ~ ~ ~ [ d' ~w y a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ _ ~~~0-~3 ~d ~ .. ~ w ~ ~ w C~ a i W ~ Q o o N d 3 ~ 0 ~ W ~d' ~N..~- .~ ~ ~ e ~. ~ N ~ ~ C a ' ~ ~ 0 a. , co" c ~~~~ ~Lm~ ~ z ~ z ~ Z d z ~ z ~ z ~ °' w ~ ~ °' w a~i Tip .°_d'b d: o -~ v ~ ~ v ~ ~~ ~.o °~ z ~;pa0> v ~ ^ W ~ ^ W O c+l ~ O1 ~ ti ca N ~ t, ti~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~, d' ® ; > ~ ~ ~ U y .~ U O O ~ V CN m m ~ ~ x ... '~ ~ H p N 7J ~ H -_ --' p p *~ ~~Z` _ ~•e ~ _-_~ 3 3 ~ 0 N N TLL_~ ,vr ~a% Z N z 3 ~ s c m L ye .~tosp ~~ - n d. ° z 3 o m .... ca .~ co ~ -a ~. v _. ~ j a~ o •~,=c ~R ~m_ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ z rn co % cv co m cv % m ~ :.~-: ~~GS2- n m rn rn ~ m N N ~n o r n r r r n n r n n n r n n r t~ o U ~~ n L ~ ' M M M M a O N lp M M M M M M M M y :~::_U m M M M M O O M M M M M M M M ~p R C0 (O CO (0 M ~ O M M M N (O f0 ._ (~ W d ' a T C N N ,N C G O ~ l6 N V T N N N ~~ N C T~ N ~ - _ ~ ~L N~ ~ ~..C to C NFL Cp L O 00 N C U f6 '~ ~.,., C 3 00 N N . NU > >+` = Q°U ~ _ ON U O 7 N LL O N N N C .L- LL ~ N ~ O H a. f U U U =~.w® _ a C O O N U v- 6 C N N • ~ _ ~ (~ U~ J ~ ~ C ~ N N • O V 7 E E N ~ N O ~ ~ C N LL N _ - ® ~ a N t V L U ~ O O N N a O E N N _ m ~ N E a~ n mN ° m y> ~o °g° O m~ N ~ o o _ O O f0 0 ~ N ~~ Q f0 "O E N c N >( N N O O ~ C N t .O N O C O O O N O ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ° O N ~' ~ c ~ C O ~ a ~ N E °~ ~ 7 0 - 'N O a aNi v U 7 a~ L1.. ~ O - i ~ ~ -COQ ~ -p N Ul J N /II E +' tll ~ a f6 C v-- O a O N N '~ T = N N iL„ O J (~ f6 - ~G- o O N > f0 - 4- N (IS ~p O 4 O ~ ~ (q N ~ O fl. °' L . O N~ O C L m - N f£ 0 ~ ~ N m O m N ~ C c ~~ d p ~ U ~ ~ L _ ~ 7 C N ° O 7 C w d ~ ~ ~~ O •~ `~ p ~ C ~ N •C p - ~~: ' a- ~~ r ~ ++ 'p_ ~ a >' Q c .•• o m Q L c c •C m U m 3 N~ N i~ M ~ N R U y N~ ~ R O O~ i u ~ •o ~ ~ L~ ~ m .OC > U ~ fn ~- yo ao a~i ~o ~N oar ,m m a~~ °' u i c~'- .I . c Q-3 ~N Q-a~ =y oL N~ L o c ~•~ m o 6 a j o ~ o ~~ ° ° ~ ~ 3•° oin v rn is O m~ .~- a~ a m „- o_ E ~' s • ~ S w = ° e ~:~ ia _ L ri O O a i °~v •~ O o'a ~ i ~~~ C C c `-,y -. ~ 7 ~3 N Q ~ N c°D - O ~° 7 ~ ~ °~ ~ U ~° lS3 ~ ~ !n - -_-~_yO..-:-:. . -~ ~ L C r Q ` 3 L U LL C N O . -y ; 0 U . ~ U L N N c O N i Q N ~ °30 ~ J O y. _ _ ~ U ~ ~o~- ~ . o " T C ---~ i~c O ~~ C ~~ ~p c R~ l6 h N 7 N 7 N ~ C ~ ° C U O J ° C O N C ~~ ~..N~ 00 ~ O G1 7"00) Q N ~ O = ~ 2 ~ N.. N E N ~ T ~ N ~ C ~ N N ~ in C ~ NL C `, 'O U N • U Q w 0 ~ V C ~ Q N w- > Ui r (6 lC L O. f~ C Q O ~ d_ ~ O O- C fif C~ l4 N C fQ N O N .N O Q ld 7 N O E C G C L N ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ UO 0 O .-. O C y0, ~ C°.1 NO N N ` -O 0 O N T N Q fl_C N Q. C to E ~ N ~ C ~_~ N O •~? O N N N _ O NN + C N 0 a^0+~. NLL X~ N ,C- N N 7 N N N 7 N N 7 O N f6 N C N N 7 N NO ~ •O N S U C 7 >i C N , U N y ~ t6 C T N O ~ ~- ~ C N 0 N L E ~ ~ OE - ~~ ~'~ ''- ~ E•-' C N ~ 'a N N O Er+ > C N (0 U T - C f6 Gw (V . ~ ` • ~p ~ C ~ F U L ~ N - - = n O C ~ 4=. d r ~ C d ~ tll f6 N L = ` C S O O N ,a + N ~ C _ R ~ 0 ~ C N U N U N N N ~ C V) N C t U ~ °g' ..N-. O v (0 O " a L .c °' N ;~, ~ d o 7 LI L `n O ° ~ '. 7 . 7 N ~ V` ~ O c .7~ 7 0 0 0 N ' d ~ rn o_ N N c ~ - N cd0 L . n. , Q • . J ~•-c , N `-; ~. w - 7 w we °~ ,+- wL N o U 7 '«- o°~ L .U 7 rn ~ r Ica O U • __ N ~ x 6 E ~' f 3 C E E ao LL x ~ o ti ~ 0 N ~~, W mvi Qa i W Wf-N "-'U~ WV..:.~ ca' I- I-a i I-~ I- F F- ~ F- Jin >° _- ~' : U' - -_ - -- (O t~ CO O O ~ C N M ~P tfi O n M O O ---- - t~ r t~ r n I~ ~- co r co r O . CV- ao r 0o r ro r ao r M r o r ao r at r O r ti U .Q Q.. Q O Z Q Z APPENDIX 1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSESSMENT Florida Statutes, Chapter 9J-5..010 (2}(b) requires that an affordable housing assessment be performed using a methodology established by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Basic data for the Affordable Housing Assessment for North Palm Beach was either extracted from the 2000 Census, or provided by the Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute (i.e., "Shimberg") at the University of Florida. A. 2000 Household Characteristics Comparative Census data for North Palm Beach and Palm Beach County are presented in Table 1. From these data, there were 4,822 owner-occupied and 1,373 renter-occupied units in North Palm Beach in 2000. Further, 11.4 percent of the Village's housing stock was held for seasonal or occasional use. Table 1 2000 Housing Tenure Characteristics North Palm Beach Palm Beach County Units Percent Units Percent Year-round housin units 7,346 100.0 556,428 100.0 Occupied housing units 6,195 84.3 474,175 85.2 Owner-occupied units 4,822 65.6 354,024 63.6 Renter-occupied units 1,373 18.7 120,151 21.6 Vacant housing units 1,151 15.7 82,253 14.8 Vacant for sale Homeowner vacancy rate 59 0.8 1.2 7,644 1.4 2.1 Vacant for rent Renter vacancy rate 172 2.3 11.1 11,412 2.1 8.7 Held for seasonal or occasional use 834 11.4 55,212 9.9 Other vacant 49 0.7 3,491 0.6 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000: SF 1, 3; Land Research Management, Inc.; 8/06 B. Population Projections The U.S. Census established the population of North Palm Beach at 12,064 residents in 2000, while the Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BEBR) at the University of Florida estimated that the population had increased to 12,553 residents by 2005. Recent building permit activity, indicative of growth in North Palm Beach since the 2000 Census, is presented in Table 2. Projections prepared in the Chapter 2.B. of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report indicate that time buildout is expected to occur. Current buildout projections do not account for the potential of redevelopment activity along the U.S. Highway 1 and Northlake Boulevard corridor. Current projections, therefore, may understate actual growth activity; however, the impact of redevelopment cannot be determined at this time. A comparison of Shimberg projections with those prepared by the Village is presented in Table 3. Table 2 Building Permit Activity 2000 - 2005 Year Single-Family Multiple-Family 2000 121 0 2001 59 0 2002 28 39 2003 51 10 2004 26 0 2005 19 - 0 2000-2005 304 49 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census; Land Research Management, Inc.; 8/06. Table 3 Comparative Projections (2000-2020) Village of North Palm Beach And "Shimberg" 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 "Shimberg" 12,064 12, 517 12, 948 13, 383 13, 836 North Palm Beach 12,064 12,572 13,091* 13,091* 13,091* * -Population projection prepared in NPB Comprehensive Plan Amendment 05-1 Source: U.S. Census; BEBR; Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute; Land Research Management. Inc.; 8/06. As a result of the similarity in the above projections and the expectation that some redevelopment activity will occur during the 2005 - 2020 period, the Shimberg data base is used for the purposes of this assessment. Population projections, by age-group, using Shimberg data are presented `in Table 4. C. Housing And Household Projections. Permanent housing needs projections during the 2000-2010 period (ie. current expected buildout date) accounting for resident household growth, as well as a reasonable vacancy rate, are summarized in Table 5. From Table 5, it is projected that 91 units will be required during the 2005-2010 period to accommodate the Village's buildout housing demand. Residential 2 acreage required to accommodate projected housing needs is discussed in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Table 4 2005-2025 Population Projections by Age Group Distribution Age 1990 2000 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 0-4 403 426 448 459 477 467 452 462 5-9 368 523 517 483 473 457 448 465 10-14 392 501 514 512 507 521 541 530 15-19 474 419 456 518 569 524 508 491 20-24 448 328 347 389 411 425 419 427 25-29 597 472 453 404 395 459 508 463 30-34 633 680 640 524 458 494 504 524 35-39 679 864 854 753 670 565 531 611 40-44 602 905 968 1,046 1,013 803 703 745 45-49 697 853 919 1, 081 1,175 1,037 -946 801 50-54 636 801 869 1, 014 1,294 1,475 1,443 1,166 55-59 753 809 848 973 1,053 1,302 1,408 1,259 60-64 936 769 793 876 995 1,235 1,537 1,743 65-69 1, 066 879 862 827 924 1,092 1,168 1,418 70-74 1, 002 947 918 783 777 859 973 1,209 75 or more 1,657 1,888 1,892 1,875 1,757 1,668 1,747 1,957 Total 11,343 12,064 12,298 12,517 12,948 13,383 13,836 14,271 Source: Shimberq Institute for Affordable Housing; Land Research Management, Inc.; 8/06. Table 5 Housing And Household Projections 2002 - 2020 Year Tenure Households Dwelling Units 2002 owner 4,890 2002 renter 1,387 2002 Total 6,277 7,446 2005 owner 4,966 2005 renter 1,409 2005 Total 6,375 7,562 2010 owner 5,145 2010 renter 1,462 2010 Total 6,607 7,837 Source: Shimberq Affordable Housing Institute; Land Research Management, Inc.; 8/06. Affordable Housing Demand Tables 6 to 9 present very-low, low and moderate income housing needs estimates and projections using Shimberg data.. An affordable home, by definition, is one where a household pays less than 30% of its annual income for gross housing costs. A household which pays 30% or more of its .annual income for gross housing costs is therefore experiencing "cost burden" (i.e. paying too high a percentage of its income for gross housing costs). From Table 6, there were an estimated 1,200 owner households and 589 renter households in a position of cost-burden in 2002. Cost burden becomes more of an issue as the percentage of household income paid for gross housing costs increases, particularly in the lower income groups when the percentage is in excess of 50% (i.e. "severe" cost burden). For comparative purposes, the numbers of owner and renter households in North Palm Beach paying 50% or more for gross housing costs are also presented in Table 6. Data in Table 6 indicates that the current incidence of cost-burden is an issue for the Village, particularly among very-low income owners. Elderly owners living on fixed incomes likely comprise the greatest percentage of cost burdened households in the Village. Tables 7 9 present projections of growth in very-low, low, moderate, and moderate+ income households, by tenure, and reflect "Shimberg" population projections presented in Table 3. Due 'primarily to the Village's limited remaining development potential, the need for additional very-low, low and moderate income housing is projected to be minimal during the projection period. From Tables 7 - 9, household growth during the 2002 - 2010 period (330 households) is projected to be distributed as follows: • Very-Low Income Renters • Low Income Renters • Moderate Income Renters • Moderate + Income Renters • Very-Low Income Owners • Low Income Owners • Moderate Income Owners • Moderate Income + Owners - 23 households - 19 households - 18 households - 15 households - 7 households - 28 households - 50 households - 170 households 4 Table 6 2002 Cost Burdened Housing (occupied units) A. Owner-Occupied Hous ing Income Group At 30% or More Cost Burden* At 50% or More Cost Burden*~ Ve -Low 543 332 Low 254 81 Moderate 203 41 Moderate+ 200 26 Subtotal Owner 1,200 480 B. Renter-Occupied Housing Income Group At 30% or More Cost Burden At 50% or More Cost Burden** Very-Low 323 230 Low 189 35 Moderate 65 9 Moderate+ 12 0 Subtotal Renter 589 274 * Deficit =Households paying 30% or more of gross income for gross housing costs ** Deficit =Households paying 50% or more of gross income for gross housing costs Source: Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute, University of Florida; Land Research Management, Inc., 8/06 Table 7 Household Projections, By Income Group 2002-2010 (Households) A. Owner-Occupied Hous eholds Year Very-Low Low Moderate Moderate+ Total 2002 943 779 986 2,182 4,890 2005 939 783 1,000 2,244 4,966 2010 950 807 1,036 2,352 5,145 B. Renter-Occupied Households Year Very-Low Low Moderate Moderate+ Total 2002 409 303 312 363 1,387 2005 415 310 318 368 1,409 2010 432 322 330 378 1,462 Source: Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute, University of Florida; Land Research Management, Inc.;, 8/06. Table 8 Growth Driven Need For Affordable Owner-Occupied Units Income Growth Period Group 2002-2005 2005-2010 2002-2010 Very-Low (4) 11 7 Low 4 24 28 Moderate 14 36 50 Source: ShimberQ Affordable Housing Institute. University of Florida.: Land Research Management Inc. 8/06 Table 9 Growth Driven Need For Affordable Renter-Occupied Units Income Growth Period Group 2002-2005 2005-2010 2002-2010 Ve -Low 6 17 23 Low 7 12 19 Moderate 4 14 18 Source: Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute. University of Florida; Land Research Management, Inc. 8/06 Housing Supply Characteristics ®ata regarding the Village's housing and household characteristics are discussed using a variety of sources in previous sections of this assessment. Further data will be provided in the data and analysis component of the updated Comprehensive Plan. Supplementing previous data are the following sections using information prepared by the Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute. Public Housing Developments `there are no public housing developments within the Village. Assisted Housing Developments There are no assisted housing developments within the Village. Mobile Home Communities There are no mobile home communities within the Village. Per Table 12, it is estimated that there was a total of 7,346 housing units in North Palm Beach in 2000, consisting of 2,661 single-family (i.e. attached and detached), 4,661 multiple-family units, and 24 "mobile home/other" units. Multiple-family units constituted approximately 64% of the total. Table 12 Units in Structure -Year 2000 Units in Structure Total Units Percent One Detached 2,471 33.7 One Attached 190 2.6 Two 58 ~ 0.8 Three or Four 228 3.1 Five to Nine 458 6.2 Ten to Nineteen 692 9.4 Twent or more 3,225 43.9 Mobile Home, Boat, RV, Van, etc. 24 0.3 Totals 7,346 100.0 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000: SF 3: Land Research Management Inca 8/06 A. Owner-Occupied Housing From Table 1, approximately 78% of the households in North Palm Beach are owner-occupied. The cost of owner-occupied housing continually increased during the 1996 - 2002 period, as indicated in Tables 13 and 14: Table 13 Yearly Single-Family Housing Sales Activity Sales Year Sales Average Sales Price ($) Real Price (2003 Dollars) 2003 NA NA NA 2002 160 503,857 514,780 2001 153 287,896 298,788 2000 134 240,530 256,732 1999 ~ 145 202,442 223,342 1998 125 162,300 183,011 1997 105 130,200 149,101 1996 85 152,633 178,801 Source: Shimberg Affordable Housing Institute: Land Research Management 1178 801 nc. 8/06 7 APPENDIX 2 Village Of North Palm Beach Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan July 2008 Table of Contents Section Page A. Introduction 1 B. Data and Analysis 2 1. Raw Water Source 4 2. Population Projections 5 3. Public Water Supply Demand Projections 6 4. Non-Public Water Supply 7 5. Conservation Practices 7 6. Availability of Water Supply 8 7. Water Supply Project Identification and Selection 10 C. Comprehensive Plan Update Requirements 10 List of Maps Map Page 1. Seacoast Utility Authority Service Area 3 List of Tables Table Page 1. Seacoast Current and Projected Water Supply 4 2. Seacoast Current and Projected Water Supply by Source 4 3. Population Projections 6 4. North Palm Beach Projected Finished Water Demand 7 5. North Palm Beach Reclaimed Water Contracts 9 6. Seacoast Interconnections 10 7. Seacoast Water Supply Projects Summary 11 North Palm Beach Potable Water Supply Facilities Work Plan A. Introduction The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) adopted the Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan update on February 15, 2007. Per Section 163.3177(c), Florida Statutes, local governments and water suppliers must adopt a related Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) and supportive amendments to their comprehensive plans by August 15, 2008. Municipalities and local suppliers are required to coordinate with SFWMD in the preparation of their WSFWP in order to identify needed facilities for at least a 10- year planning period, confirming that: (1) adequate water supply is available, considering the regional water supply plan; and (2) infrastructure plans necessary to serve projected need have been prepared. Specifically, WSFWP comprehensive plan amendments must: • Demonstrate that the local government has coordinated with the appropriate water management district's regional water supply plan. • Ensure that the local government's future land use plan is based upon the availability of adequate water supplies and public facilities and services. • Ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities are available to serve new development no later than the date on which the local government issues a certificate of occupancy and consult with the applicable water supplier prior to approving a building permit to determine whether adequate water supplies will be available to serve new development by the anticipated issuance date of the certificate of occupancy. • Revise the five-year schedule of capital improvements to include any water supply, reuse and conservation projects and programs to be implemented during the five-year period. Revise the Conservation Element to assess projected water needs and sources for at least a ten-year planning period, considering the appropriate regional water supply plan. • To maintain internal consistency, revise the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to ensure coordination of the comprehensive plan with the regional water supply plan and regional water supply authorities. • Clearly define responsibilities for planning, financing, construction and/or operation of the water supply facilities by all entities providing service within its jurisdiction, regardless of ownership responsibility for the individual facilities, including: (1) water supply source, service areas, existing demands and future projects; (2) treatment types and losses; (3) distribution facilities; and (4) bulk sales agreements. Seacoast has coordinated with government jurisdictions in its service area by providing key data related to population projections and projected- potable water demands. As a result, the North Palm Beach WSFWP is prepared using the best available data. The following paragraphs address the Village's WSFWP requirements. B. Data and Analysis North Palm Beach does not own or operate its own potable water supply system. Rather, potable water facilities and services -are provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (Seacoast). The corporate limits of the Village, within the Seacoast service area, is .illustrated on Map 1. All responsibilities for the withdrawal, treatment and distribution of potable water to the residents and businesses in the Village are assumed by Seacoast, including the direct billing of customers. Related to the approval of development orders, Seacoast requires developers to upgrade the capacity of existing systems, and/or build new systems to meet their needs. Upon completion, Seacoast assumes ownership, operation and maintenance responsibilities of all related systems. Seacoast currently operates two fully interconnected lime-softening water treatment facilities (Richard Road - 7.5 MGD capacity and Hood Road - 23.0 MGD) with a combined finished water treatment peak-day capacity of 30.5 MGD. According to the report entitled "Preliminary Design Evaluation for Modifications to the Hood Road and Richard Road Water Treatment Plants" (12/05), the current treatment facilities have the capacity to serve buildout of that portion of the service area located east of the C-18 Canal, including the Village of North Palm Beach. Future plant expansion may be necessary depending upon development approvals to the west of the C-18 Canal. 2 ~Z ~ pug `L8 `98 `88 `t~8 `£8 `Z8 `t~L `£L M suap~e~ yoeag wee yoeag wled yl~ol ~~ed axle yoeag oun h~uno, <sanlen ~ayW Ile uo6/I~od tipunc saipog ~a~ep s~aa~l speoy ~ofeW __._.. `d32~1b~ 3~Inb3S Jlll2lOHlflb~ All~llfl 1Sb~O~b~3S - ~ d~dW easy aowaS Vf1S - pua6a~ •c~~,r ~ aA~cnl'1111 11'11~Aa IIIIpJ IIIJAAI C ~ ~ A ~ V i~ QI ~ N lO Q ~' J ~ (~ m N ° _ N ~ al ~ N E N 01 ~' m ~ ~ s ~ s >• m a a- m 'O ? .~ v ~ c ° ~ ° m r E C ~~ to ~ m v U~ J Z d J ~ ~ a ~ a ~ oooaa _ , ~~z . T { ~' r 144 ~ ~ f -~ it -' 1 ill a i - F~S~~I~ ~ ~ N .~ I I ~I~ 11 II~~ I~ _ _i'~r^-~- t ~ 1~ ~ ~ C 'fie ~ ~ ,-.'~ ~ ~~1 _ ~~ r F er=a ~' f ~ ~ x l r -~ ~ ~ ~~~~ t Z~-~ a `- .~ ~ ~~ _~ ~ ~ _v_ ~ ~~~~ (fin ~_~~,~_ s c ~[ \ ~ :r' ~ Gt' i ~ ~ ~ ,aY~ ~ ~y a s. ~'~ i ~ e,' s ~~ ,.e. x ~~ ~ l ~ f ~' ~~~ t V/ f ~ '~ 4 ,.,. i ~`~h..~ ~ '` , ~`r ~ c~F. ~ / `~ E Q `! ~ c A ~~~ t~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~> ~ ~, .~ ~ ~£~ .., ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r , t) 1 __ ~ ~ ~{ CO c~ ~' _ _ ~ ora _ ~ ~ A, ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ® ery ~ ~ J Seacoast's Board, consisting of representatives of those political jurisdictions receiving service, has approved an $88 million five-year capital improvements program to replace the lime-softening capacity with a single centralized 30.5 MGD membrane treatment plant. The proposed facility will include 26.0 MGD of nanofiltration capacity to treat surficial water sources and 4.5 MGD of low pressure reverse osmosis capacity to treat brackish water from the Floridan Aquifer System (FAS). 1. Raw Water Source According to the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan 2005-2006 Update (2005- 2006 Update), Seacoast currently (2005) withdraws an average of 18.53 MGD of raw water from the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS). Current Seacoast plans will result in the use of both the Surficial and Floridan Aquifer Systems in the future. Projections of raw water supply and finished water demand for Seacoast from the 2005-2006 Update, are presented in Table 1. Projections of finished water demand, by expected supply component are presented in Table 2. Based upon the projections in Table 2, future withdrawal from the Biscayne/SurFicial Aquifer should not exceed current levels. TABLE 1 Seacoast Current and Projected Water Supply Year Raw Water Withdrawal (MGD) Finished Water Demand (MGD) 2005 19.12 18.53 2010 20.68 20.14 2015 23.76 22.46 2020 26.22 24.30 2025 28.31 25.87 * -Demand under average conditions. Source: Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan, 2005-2006 Update. TABLE 2 Seacoast Current and Projected Water Supply By Source Year BiscaynelSurficial Aquifer (MGD) Floridan A uifer(MGD) Total (MGD) 2005 18.53 0.00 18.53 2015 18.53 3.90 22.46 2025 18.53 7.30 25.87 Source: Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan, 2005-2006 Update. The current Seacoast Public Water Supply consumptive use permit (CUP 50- 00365-W) was renewed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in April 2000 and modified in February 2003 fora 5-year period ~at an average-day allocation of 19.3 MGD and apeak-day allocation of 26.8 MGD. 4 The pending permit renewal seeks an average-day surficial aquifer allocation of 22.2 MGD. It is anticipated that the permit will be renewed during 2008 with a five-year duration to 2013. The SFWMD staff report related to the current CUP establishes the projected 2020 population of the service area at 146,161 residents and that of North Palm Beach at 14,484 residents. However, more recent projections have resulted in lower figures. The Palm Beach County 20 Year Water Supply Work Plan (4/08) projects the 2020 Seacoast service area at 105,945 residents and Seacoast (3/08) has projected the 2020 service area population at 109,579 residents. Further, Seacoast has projected the Village 2020 population at 13,731 residents. Raw water is presently drawn from four surficial aquifer wellfields (Hood Road, North Palm Beach, Burma Road and Palm Beach Gardens), pursuant to the current CUP. Each of the wellfields has permitted average and maximum daily. withdrawal rates established by CUP conditions. Each wellfield has protection zones mapped by the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM According to the current CUP, all wellfields are protected by the Palm Beach County Welli•ield Protection Ordinance. Zones of protection are developed and zone requirements enforced by the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management. The CUP further states that the potential -for induced movement of contaminants from known sources of pollution to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. 2. Population Projections Population projections for the Village and the Seacoast service area were supplied by Seacoast in a letter dated March 10, 2008. Projections for the Seacoast service area were also prepared by the Palm Beach County Planning Division during the preparation of the Palm Beach County 20 Year Water Supply Work Plan. Projections for the Village and the Seacoast service area, using Seacoast data, are presented in Table 3. Village population projections were most recently updated in the 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Methodology used in the EAR projections determined that buildout of the Village would occur by 2010 and result in a population of 13,091 residents, or 102% of the number projected by Seacoast (Ref: Table 3). Since the preparation of the EAR, the housing market has declined resulting in the conclusion that buildout will not occur by 2010. Further, the Village is considering (not adopted) additional Future Land Use Map amendments that 5 may increase the buildout population estimate and extend the buildout date. As a result, the Seacoast projections, as presented in Table 3, appear reasonable and will be used for the purposes of projecting future Village water supply needs. TABLE 3 Population Projections Resident Populatio n Projections* North Palm Beach Share Year Seacoast Service Area North Palm Beach of Service Area 2006 90,084 12,562 13.9% 2010 99,995 12,879 12.9% 2015 109, 579 13, 341 12.2% 2020 109,893 13,731 12.5% 2025 112,495 13,731 12.2% * -Seacoast data; March 2008. Seacoast service area projections are slightly higher than those prepared by Palm Beach County and used in the Palm Beach County 20-Year Water Supply Plan (4/08). A comparison of Seacoast Service Area Projections, per Table 5-1 of that document with those presented in Table 3 above indicate that Seacoast's projections (109,893 residents) are 3.7% higher than those prepared by Palm Beach County (i.e. 105,945 residents for the Seacoast service area) for the year 2020. Due to the slight difference and in order to maintain consistency with the Village's service provider, projections prepared by Seacoast are used herein. 3. Public Water Supply Demand Projections The Village's adopted potable water level-of-service (L®S) standards are as follows: Average Day Generation : Residential - 99 gallons per capita per day; and Non-Residential -1,874 gallons/acre/day. Maximum Day Generation : Residential ~ 147 gallons per capita per day; and Non-Residential - 2,782 gallons/acre/day. For planning purposes, Seacoast currently uses an average day generation rate of 191 gallons per capita per day (gpcd), consistent with the current system-wide usage (i.e. CUP 50-00365-W)). Seacoast does not employ anon-residential generation rate; rather, all consumption (i.e. for planning purposes) is expressed on a per capita basis. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, the Seacoast generation rate (191 gpcd) is used to project Village water demands. Projections of finished water demand for North Palm Beach are presented in Table 4. Projections, supplied by Seacoast in March 2008, include a "seasonal 6 adjustment" to account for the impacts upon average daily demand of occasional residents. Current (2006) finished potable water demand is estimated at 2.52 MGD (i.e. resident + "seasonal adjustment" population of 13,190 residents x 191 gallons per capita per day), representing approximately 14% of the total within the Seacoast service area. It is projected that the Village's finished potable water demand, using population projections (i.e. resident + "seasonal adjustment" population of 14,418 residents per Table 4) will attain a level of 2.75 MGD by 2025, or approximately 13% of the total demand within the Seacoast service area. TABLE 4 North Palm Beach Projected Finished Water Demand North- Palm Beach Population Projections Potable Water Demand Year Residents* Seasonal Adjustment * (MGD)** 2006 12, 562 628 2.52 2010 12, 879 644 2.58 2015 13, 341 667 2.68 2020 13,731 687 2.75 2025 13,731 687 2.75 * -Seacoast data; March 2008. ** -Residents + Seasonal Adiustment x 191 gpcd. North Palm Beach is willing to cooperate with Seacoast and its participating local governments in developing residential and non-residential LOS standards to better estimate and project potable water use and needs throughout the entire service area. 4. Non-Public Water Supply The Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan 2005-2006 Update identifies several classifications of water supply, including: Public Water Supply; Domestic Self- Supply; Agricultural; Commercial and Industrial; Thermoelectric Power Generation; and Recreational. All customers supplied by Seacoast are included in the Public Water Supply Category, which includes a majority of the land uses in North Palm Beach. The exceptions are the North Palm Beach Country Club and the Village of North Palm Beach (public grounds irrigation). Both of these are classified as Recreational Supply. • The Village has a permit (50-03878-W) for the withdrawal of a maximum of 0.0379 MGD from the Surficial Aquifer at the North Palm Beach 7 Community Center for the purpose of landscape irrigation. The permit, issued in July 2005, will expire in August 2017. The Village has a pending permit (50-00084-W) renewal for the withdrawal of a maximum of 181.28 million gallons per year from the Surficial Aquifer at the North Palm Beach Country Club for the purpose of golf course irrigation. In addition, there are several public and private entities in the Village that have procured consumptive use permits to withdraw raw water from the Surficial Aquifer for the purpose of irrigation. Among the largest of the users, including their maximum annual withdrawal rates, are the following: Benjamin School (9.11 million gallons); Landings East Condominium (11.83 million gallons); and Passionist Monastery (15.7 million gallons). 5. Conservation Practices Seacoast has included an extensive conservation program as part of its CUP, including the following components: • Permanent Irrigation Ordinance - Palm Beach County adopted the Water and Irrigation Conservation ordinance on January 19, 1993. This ordinance, which limits lawn irrigation to the hours or 5PM to 9AM, is in effect countywide unless municipalities adopt a landscaping ordinance of their own. • Xeriscape Ordinance -Section 7.3.1 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code requires all new landscape plans to promote water conservation by achieving a minimum score on a water conservation point scale. • Ultra-Low Volume Plumbing Fixtures -All five participating governments have adopted the Standard Plumbing Code, 1994 Edition, which provides for maximum flows of volumes for various plumbing fixtures in all new construction. • Water Conservation Rate Structure - On June 1, 1994, Seacoast implemented a rate structure that incorporated inclining block commodity rates. Seacoast has indicated that the rate structure has been successful in encouraging water conservation. • Leak Detection -Seacoast field personnel are trained to identify leaks and has a sonic leak detector. In addition, all accounts are metered and included in a change out program which tests all large meters annually for accuracy and replaces small meters on either a "fixed service life" or "maximum mileage" basis. • Rain Sensor Devices -Currently, all five member governments have code requirements for the installation of rain sensor overrides for new lawn irrigation systems. Water Conservation Education Program -Seacoast has an extensive public conservation education program and provides conservation-related pamphlets in its customer lobby. • Reclaimed Water -Seacoast has been providing wastewater effluent for irrigation purposes since 1978. At present, Seacoast's entire average daily wastewater flow is committed to active on-line reclaimed water consumers. An inventory of contracts for reclaimed water in North Palm Beach is presented in Table 5. TABLE 5 North Palm Beach Reclaimed Water Contracts Name Classification* Allocation (MGD) Old Port Cove A -Guaranteed 0.200 Gemini Condominium B- Non-Guaranteed 0.034 Royale Harbor Condominium B- Non-Guaranteed 0.040 Waterwa Terrace Condominium B- Non-Guaranteed 0.031 Seamark Condominium B- Non-Guaranteed 0.020 Villa a of North Palm Beach B- Non-Guaranteed 0.300 Total 0.625 * -According to Seacoast, Class B contracts have always received their allocations Source: Seacoast Utility Authority; 12/31/07; North Palm Beach; 7/11/08. 6. Availability of Water Supply In September 2006, Seacoast entered into a Service Area Agreement (82005- 1769) with Palm Beach County defining the service area boundary between the two providers. Delineation of the service area boundary was intended to eliminate or minimize duplication of facilities, provide for the orderly growth, expansion and extension of respective water, wastewater and reclaimed water utility systems. The Agreement benefited existing and future Seacoast customers by ensuring the most efficient delivery of public utility services. The pending Seacoast CUP permit renewal, expected to be approved by the South Florida Water Management District during 2008, will insure adequate water supply through 2013. Further, by implementing the improvements identified in the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan, 2005-2006 Update (Ref: Table 7), Seacoast will insure adequate water supply for its service area through 2025., provided that there are no unforeseen impacts upon existing and planned supplies. 9 The Seacoast system is interconnected with the Jupiter and Riviera Beach systems in the event of an emergency shortage. Interconnections are detailed in Table 6. In addition, in June 2006, a Utility Bulk Service Agreement (82006- 0687) was executed with Palm Beach County to provide Seacoast with up to 5 MGD of bulk potable water and bulk wastewater service during an initial term of five years. Seacoast has the- option to extend the Bulk Agreement for a period of 25 years at the same capacity level. The Bulk Agreement will provide Seacoast with the supply necessary to meet future demand in that portion of its service area located west of the C-17 Canal. According to Seacoast, water supply in this area will not be necessary until 2009. The Bulk Agreement requires that the County install necessary potable water pipeline improvements to the area. By entering into the Agreement, Seacoast customers will benefit from the competitive prices of bulk water. TABLE 6 Seacoast Interconnections Entity Size (inches) Capacity (gpm) Location Ju iter 16 4,000 SR 811 and Donald Ross Rd. Jupiter 10 2,500 US 1 and Ocean Drive Riviera Beach 12 3.,500 Military Trail and Leo Lane Based on the data and analysis presented in Sections 1-5, it is concluded that the Village's future land use mix is feasible, from the perspective of projected .potable water supply needs during the ensuing five and ten-year periods. As stated above, the report entitled "Preliminary Design Evaluation for Modifications to the Hood Road and Richard Road Water Treatment Plants" (12/05), concludes that current treatment facilities have the capacity to serve buildout of that portion of the service area located east of the C-18 Canal, including North Palm Beach. 7. Vilater Supply Project Identification and Selection The 2005-2006 Update recommends two major capital improvements projects for the Seacoast water supply system. • Construction of a 4.0 MGD reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment plant at the Hood Road water treatment project. The SFWMD further proposes to increase this project to yield at least 8.0 MGD of finished water. Conversion of the 30.0 MGD lime-softening treatment Hood Road water treatment project to 26.0 MGD treatment capacity. Losses in efficiency from th nanofiltration would be met by the expanded Floridan project. capacity at the of nanofiltration e conversion to wells in the first 10 Recommended projects for consideration by Seacoast are summarized in Table 7. Neither of the projects are the responsibility of North Palm Beach and therefore are not included in the Village's Five-Year Schedule of Improvements. C. Comprehensive Plan Update Requirements During the preparation of the 2006 Evaluation -and Appraisal Report (EAR), a review of statutory (Florida Statutes) and Code (Florida Administrative Code) amendments affecting the North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan was completed. The analysis, .including recommendations for Comprehensive Plan amendments is contained in Appendices 3 and 4 of the EAR. The analysis in the EAR directed Comprehensive Plan amendments to address potable water supply in several elements. TABLE 7 _ Seacoast Water Supply Projects Summary Total Design Ca pacity (M GD) Alternative Capital Costs Project Description Source ($million) 2010 2015 2020 2025 Hood Road WTP RO Brackish 59.0 1.60 3.90 5.80 7.30 System -Four Floridan Wells and Two RO Reject Wells Seacoast 4.0 MGD Reclaimed 10.3 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Reclaimed Water Treatment Expansion 2006 Funded Project* e Project was completed in 2006. Source: Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan, 2005-2006 Update. EAR-directed Comprehensive Plan amendments regarding water supply planning are tracked and documented in the 2008 Support Documentation, the data and analysis for current ERA-based Comprehensive Plan amendments, including Water Supply Facilities Plan requirements. A summary of the Comprehensive Plan amendments is as follows: Future Land lJse Element (Chapter 3.0): Add Policy 2.6 to read as follows: Policy 2.6: At the time of each required Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the Village shall update the Water Supply Facilities Plan to determine whether or not adequate water supply is available to meet projected needs of the ensuing 10-year period. Infrastructure Element (Chapter 6.0): Incorporate the Village's Water Supply Facilities Plan, by reference, within Section 6.1. Also, add or revise the following: 11 Add Goal 6.2.6: Coordinate with Seacoast and Palm Beach County in the preparation of their Ten-Year Water Supply Work Plans, consistent with the directives of the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan. Revise Policy 1.1: Public facility level-of-service standards as displayed on Table 6-1 are hereby adopted, and shall be used as the basis for estimating the availability of capacity and demand generated by a proposed development. However, potable water level-of-service (LOS) standards used for Water Supply Facilities Planning purposes shall be consistent with those used by Seacoast Utility Authority. Further, coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority in developing appropriate residential and non-residential LOS categories should they become necessary to better project future water supply needs. Add Policy 5.6: At the time of each required Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the Village shall incorporate necessary Ten-Year Water Supply Work Plan directives enacted by its water supplier and the regional water supply plan. Conservation Element (Chapter 8.0): Add the following objective and policies: Add OBJECTIVE 8: Participate in the formulation and implementation of water supply conservation programs developed by Seacoast Utility Authori Policy 8.1: Coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority to implement potable water conservation programs established as part of its Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and Consumptive Use Permit. Policy 8.2: Cooperate with Seacoast Utility Authority in the development and implementation of water reuse programs, to the. extent that they may apply to North Palm Beach. Intergovernmental Element (Chapter 10.0): Add the following policies: Add Policy 1.15: Require that all applicants for development approval procure written confirmation of availability of potable water service prior to the issuance of a building permit. Add Policy 4.5: At the time of each required Evaluation and Appraisal Report confirm the availability of potable water service, consistent with the regional water supply plan and Ten-Year Water Supply Facility Plans of Seacoast Utility Authority and Palm Beach County. 12 Capital Improvements Element (Chapter 11.0): Revise the following policy: Revise Policy 7.1.1: A development order or permit shall be issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development or redevelopment. Further, prior to the approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the Village shall consult with the applicable supplier to determine whether adequate water supplies will be available to serve a new development no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy 13 APPENDIX 3 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2009 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Prepared For: Village of North Palm Beach Prepared By: Land Research Management, Inc. December 2008; Revised March 2009 Table of Contents Section Page A. Introduction 1 1. Government Fund ~ 1 2. Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund 2 B. Financial Feasibility of the Comprehensive Plan 2 1. Revenues 2 2. Expenditures 5 3. Assets and Liabilities 7 4. Capital Improvements Funding Potential 7 5. Capital Spending Program 8 6. Capital Improvements, LOS and Budget 10 C. Level of Service Analysis 11 1. Sanitary Sewer 11 2. Potable Water 13 3, Solid Waste 14 4. Storm Water Drainage 15 5. Roadways 16 6. Recreation and Open Space 19 D. Five-Year Schedule of Improvements 21 1. Fiscal Responsibility 21 2. Time Period 21 3. Project Description and General Location 22 4. Project Costs and Schedule 24 5. Revenue Sources 24 6. Financial Feasibility 25 E. Capital Improvements Element Amendments 26 List of Appendices Appendix A -Palm Beach County School District Five-Year Capital Budget Appendix B -Adoption Ordinance List of Tables Table Page 1 Government Funds Revenue History 3 2 Government Funds Revenue Projections 4 3 Enterprise Fund Operating Revenue History 4 4 Enterprise Fund Revenue Projections 5 5 Government Funds Expense History 5 6 Government Funds Expense Projections 6 7 Enterprise Fund Operating Expense History 6 8 Enterprise Fund Operating Expense Projections 7 9 Undesignated Government Funds Balance 7 10 Government Funds Capital Projects Funding Potential 8 11 FY 2008/2009 Five-Year Capital Plan -Government Funds 9 12 Fiscal Year Population Projections 14 13 List of Solid Waste Capital Improvements Projects 15 14 List of Stormwater Capital Improvements Projects 16 15 Roadway Level-of-Service Analysis 17 16 List of Roadway Capital Improvements Projects 19 17 Recreation and Open Space Facilities 19 18 List of .Recreation & Open Space Capital Improvements Projects 20 19 Summary of Capital Improvements Projects 22 20 Schedule and Cost of Capital Improvements Projects 24 21 Revenue Sources for Capital Improvements Projects 25 A. Introduction The Village provides a range of services to its residents and businesses, including: • General Government • Public Safety (police and fire protection, including emergency medical services) • Public Works (Facility and vehicle maintenance, sanitation, and street maintenance) • Parks and Recreation (parks, library, pool and marina) • Community Development (planning, zoning, building and code enforcement) • Emergency Management Potable water and sanitary sewer services are provided to Village residents and businesses by Seacoast Utility Authority. The Village organizes its financial accounts into funds, which are groups of related accounts used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. All funds can be divided into the following three categories: (1) government, (2) enterprise, and (3) fiduciary. Fiduciary funds, which include the Village's two pension funds, are not considered further in this analysis since their resources are not available to support general government activities. 1. Government Fund Government funds are used to account for most of the Village's government activities except those that are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted for specified uses or those that are reported separately as business activities (enterprise funds). The Village utilizes the following government funds: General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and Special Revenue Funds. The General Fund is the Village's primary operating fund. It accounts for all of the financial resources of the general government, except for those required to be accounted for in another fund. The Capital Projects Fund is used to account for the cost of acquiring, constructing, and placing into service those capital improvements which are financed by long-term debt issues to be repaid by operating revenues in the General Fund. Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources used to fund major capital improvements projects that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The Village has four special revenue funds; Public Safety, Northlake Boulevard, Recreation, and On-Behalf Pension Contributions. Government fund accounting focuses on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources at the end of the fiscal year. This information is useful in evaluating the Village's near-term future financing requirements. 2. Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund The Village's only proprietary fund is the Country Club Fund, which charges customers for the services it provides. B. Financial Feasibility of the Comprehensive Plan This section addresses state financial analysis requirements for the Capital Improvements Element. 1. Revenues Taxes -For accounting purposes, North Palm Beach combines taxes from several sources, including property taxes, local option gas taxes, utility services taxes, franchise fees, and sales and use taxes. Ad valorem taxes account for approximately 78% of all taxes collected, and 60% - 65% of all revenues received by the Village. The FY 2007 tax rate 'for the Village for municipal services was 6.30 mills applied to an assessed property value of approximately $1.98 billion. Total tax revenues in FY 2007 were $15.58 million, with $12.08 million in ad valorem tax revenues.. Licenses, Permits and Fees -The Village received $ 880,000 in licenses, permits and fees, including those for occupational licenses, building permits and zoning fees, etc. in FY 2007. Licenses, permits and fees revenues declined in FY 2007 by approximately 22% from the prior year. Intergovernmental (Revenue Sharing) -These funds are provided to the Village by the State based upon a defined allocation methodology. Revenues include State revenue sharing, half-cent sales tax, County gas tax, and municipal share of County occupational licenses. In FY 2007, the total intergovernmental revenue collected was $2.75 million, a decrease of 6% from the prior year. Charges for Services -The Village charges for the provision of specific services that directly impact individuals or entities, including: fees and service charges for special services and enterprise operations (Country Club), inspection fees, recreation fees, public hearing fees, etc. The Village General Fund received approximately $1.08 million for services rendered in FY 2007, a slight increase over the previous year. Fines and Forfeitures -Fines include court fines, violations of local ordinances, etc. In FY 2007 the total revenue collected was approximately $ 132,000. Investment Earnings - In FY 2007 the total revenue collected was approximately $ 650, 000. Miscellaneous - In FY 2007, the total revenue collected was approximately $195,000. Miscellaneous revenue sources include interest earnings, rental fees, and donations, etc. 2 Government funds revenues (rounded) are summarized in Table 1 for the years FY 2004 - FY 2008. FY 2008 figures reflect budgeted amounts, not audited totals. Annual revenues increased by $5.1 million during this period, with a majority (67%) resulting from taxes. Licenses and Permits, Charges for Services, and Investment Income also increased during the period. Other revenue sources have generally remained steady or experienced a decline. Table 1 e Government Funds Revenue History Fiscal Year ($ Thousand) Revenue Source 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Taxes 11,440 13,237 14,340 15, 578 15,144 Licenses and Permits 712 1,132 1,129 880 1,118 Inter overnmental 1,350 2,805 2,914 2,750 1,380 Char es for Services 720 648 1,004 1,083 1,280 Fines and Forfeitures 122 235 165 132 150 Investment Income 54 197 477 650 527 Miscellaneous 175 83 131 195 93 Total Revenues 14,573 18,337 20,160 21,268 19,692 Sources: North Palm Beach, Florida Comprehensive Financial Reports; FY 2004 (page 15); FY 2005 (page 15); FY 2006 (page 16); FY 2007 (page 16) 2008-2009 Adopted Budget (page 6 of 125); Land Research Management, Inc. Over the course of the FY 2004 - FY 2008 period, government funds revenues increased from $1,163 per capita in FY 2004 to $1,572 per capita in FY 2008, an increase of $409 per capita per year. The increase is due primarily to the dramatic increase in the Village's property tax base during the FY 2004 ®2007 period. The recent rate of increase in government funds revenues is not expected to be maintained during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 period, as tax base growth is projected to moderate for the following reasons.: (1) The rate of construction activity is expected to decline to due to buildout of the Village; (2) a decline in residential sales activity and prices due to the downturn of the housing market; (3) property tax reform which increased the homestead exemption, capping of assessed values of non-homesteaded homes, and "portability" of the "Save Our Homes" benefits. As a result, a very moderate growth rate in the tax base is expected (Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report; September 2007). Due to the tax reform measures, property tax revenues are expected to initially decline, and then rebound somewhat, as the housing market begins to recover. However, infill development and redevelopment activity, and annexation of additional properties to the Village can result in additional future property tax revenues. 3 The Village has not historically prepared government funds revenue projections. However, revenues can be projected by applying the following assumptions: (1) "property taxes" revenue will maintain its current level during FY 2009 due to the effects of the tax reform, and increase at an annual rate of 3% per year for the ensuing four period, assuming that the housing market will begin to rebound, and (2) "property taxes" revenue will represent approximately 62% of total government funds revenue, as evidenced in the FY 2004 - FY 2008 period. Table 2 presents annual revenue projections using these assumptions. Table 2 -Government Funds Revenue Projections ($000's) Fiscal Year Property Taxes ($) Other Revenue $) Total Revenue~`* ($) 2009* 11,757 7,316 19,073 2010 12,110 7,422 19,532 2011 12,473 7,645 20,118 2012 12,847 7,874 20,721 2013 13,232 8,110 21,342 * - Adopted FY 2009 Budget (page 6) ** -Assumes no revenue from "Non-Revenue" and "Transfers" sources Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 11108. The Village's Enterprise Fund (Country Club) operating revenues are summarized in Table 3 for the years FY 2006 - FY 2008. Annual operating revenues increased by $2.68 million during this period. Charges for services account for between 85% and 90% of Enterprise Fund annual revenues. Table 3 -Enterprise Fund Operating Revenue History Country Club Fiscal Year $000's Enterprise Fund 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Golf 2,275 2,347 1,916 2,970 3,457 Tennis 90 83 94 306 0 Pool 121 109 0 0 0 Restaurant 62 70 110 118 155 Administration/Misc. 43 50 116 69 25 Total Revenues 2,591 2,659 2,236 3,463 3,637 Sources: North Palm Beach, Florida Comprehensive Financial Reports; FY 2004 (page 18); FY 2005 (page 18); FY 2006 (page 19); FY 2007 (page 19) 2008-2009 Adopted Budget (pages 97, 99, and 101 of 125); Land Research Management, Inc. The Village does not normally prepare Enterprise Fund revenue projections for the ensuing five-year period. Table 4 presents Enterprise Fund revenue projections for the FY 2009 - 2013 period, assuming a 3% annual growth rate to account for inflation. 4 Table 4 -Enterprise Fund Revenue Projections Country Club Fiscal Year ($00 0's)* Enterprise Fund 2009** 2010 2011 2012 2013 Golf 3,380 3,481 3,586 3,693 3,804 Tennis 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant 163 168 173 178 183 Miscellaneous 30 31 32 33 34 Total Revenues 3,573 3,680 3,791 3,904 4,021 * - Assumes a 3% annual. increase. ** -Adopted FY 2009 Budget (pages 95 and 99 of 125) Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 11/08. 2. Expenditures. Table 5 shows Government Funds expenditures for FY 2004 0 2008. During the FY 2004 - FY 2008 period, annual capital outlay expenditures funded by Government Funds revenues (i.e. excluding those financed by loans, notes and bonds) ranged from $0 (FY 2005) to $2.74 million (FY 2007). The Capital Outlay figure for FY 2008 is included within the other expenditure categories. Table 5 -Government Funds Expense History Fiscal Year ($000's) Expenditure 2004 2005 2006 2007 20 08 General Government 1,533 2,062 1,648 2,305 . 1,824 Public Safe 5,019 5,714 6,495 6,610 7,058 Public Services 3,280 5,020 4,181 3,558 5,103 Comm. Dev./Plannin 0 0 651 735 1,019 Leisure Services 1,256 1,377 2,120 2,430 2,919 Other 1,187 817 2 0 0 Ca italOutla 582 0 1,917 2,737 0* Debt Service 996 1,054 1,079 996 1,769 Total Expenditures 13,853 16,044 18,093 19,371 19,692 * Capital outlay included in other expenditure categories Sources: North Palm .Beach, Florida Comprehensive Financial Reports; FY 2004 (page 15); FY 2005 (page 15); FY 2006 (page 16); FY 2007 (page 16) 2008-2009 Adopted Budget (page 6 of 125); Land Research Management, Inc. Capital Outlay expenditures ranged from 0% to 13% of total Government Funds revenues during the FY 2004 - 2007 period. FY 2008 was excluded from the analysis since Capital Outlay figures are included in the other expenditure categories. Table 6 shows expenditures projections, for the year 2009 - 2013, assuming maintenance of the expenditure (less Capital Outlay) to revenue ratio exhibited during the FY 2004 - FY 2007 period. FY 2005 was excluded from the analysis, since there were no Capital Outlay expenditures recorded. Table 6 -Government Funds Expense Projections Fiscal Year Revenues $)* Expenses/Revenues Ratio~* Expenses ($) 2009 19,073 0.83 15,831 2010 19,532 0.83 16,212 2011 20,118 0.83 16,698 2012 20,721 0.83 17,198 2013 21,342 0.83 17,714 - Total revenue from Table 2. ** - FY 2007 Expenses (less Capital Outlay)/Revenues Ratio. Average of FY 2004, 2006, and 2007 Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 12/08. Enterprise Fund operating expenditures for FY 2008 were $3.6 million. Table 7 shows actual expenditures for FY 2004 - 2008 using data provided by the City's Finance Department. Annual operating expenditures increased by $1.81 million during this period. The City does not normally prepare Enterprise Fund expenditure projections for the ensuing five-year period. For the purposes of this analysis, Enterprise Funds operating expenditures projections were prepared for the years FY 2009 - 2013, assuming a 3% annual growth rate (i.e. CPI factor used by the Florida Public Service Commission). These .projections are presented in Table 8. Table 7 -Enterprise Fund Operating Expense History Country Club Fiscal Year ($000's) Enterprise Fund 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Golf 1,160 1,791 1,489 2,261 2,995 Tennis 118 164 116 322 0 Pool 203 214 0 0 0 Restaurant 39 39 28 50 49 Administration* 309 197 278 358 -593 Total Expenses 1,829 2,405 1.,911 2,991 3,637 * -Administrative and general expenses and insurance. Sources: North Palm Beach, Florida Comprehensive Financial Reports; FY 2004 (page 18); FY 2005 (page 18); FY 2006 (page 19); FY 2007 (page 19) 2008-2009 Adopted Budget (pages 97, 99, and 101 of 125); Land Research Management, Inc. 6 Table 8 _ Enterprise Funds Operating Expense Projections Fiscal Year ($000)* Enterprise Fund 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Golf 3,085 3,177 3,273 3,371 3,473 Tennis 0 0 0 0 0 Restaurant 50 52 52 55 57 Administration 610 629 629 667 687 Total Revenues 3,745 3,858 3,954 4,093 4,217 * - Assumes a 3% annual increase. ** - Adopted FY 2009 Budget (pages 95 and 99 of 125) Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 11/08. 3. Assets and Liabilities. North Palm Beach has historically maintained a sound financial position, with a substantial and increasing Undesignated Government Funds balance (i.e. funds available for spending), as indicated in Table 9. Table 9 -Undesignated Government Funds Balance ($000's) .Fiscal Year Assets * Liabilities ** Reserved*** Undesignated **** 2003 3,710 1,088 968 1,655 2004 4.,487 572 689 3,226 2005 6,932 943 217 5,772 2006 8,945 816 309 7,820 2007 11,834 1,810 946 8,853 * - Cash & cash equivalents, investments, net accounts receivable, inventories and other assets. ** - Accounts payable, other current liabilities and deferred revenues. ***- Inventories, prepaid items, encumbrances, and restricted assets. **** - Undesignated funds, special revenue funds and capital projects. Sources: Village of North Palm Beach, Florida Financial Reports for the Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2003 s 2007 (page 15); Land Research Management, Inc. 11/08. 4. Capital Improvements Funding Potential. Several sources of revenue are available to the Village for use in financing capital improvements, including: Government Funds revenues and reserves; loans and bonds (general obligation and revenue); grants; special assessments; and developer contributions. North Palm Beach has used many of these sources in the past, and each alternative remains available to the Village. 7 Capital improvements are generally financed from Government Funds revenues, and grants or loans, including bonds. Debt financing is used on an "as-needed" basis. At the end of FY 2007, total long-term Government Funds debt was $5.8 million, none of which was backed by the full faith and credit of the Village. With a minor unsecured exception, loans payable were secured by franchise fees, public services taxes, and other non ad valorem revenues. Country Club capital improvements are generally financed by loans and long-term leases. Pledged revenues from the Enterprise Fund repay the debt. At the end of FY 2007, total long-term Enterprise Fund debt was $5.1 million. Projections of Government Funds revenues available to the Village for capital improvements projects during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 period are presented in Table 10. Table 10 -Government Funds Capital Protects Funding Potential Fiscal Year Rvvenues($)'` Capital Projects Potential ($000's)'" 2009 19,073 1,717 2010 19,532 1,758 2011 20,118 1,811 2012 20,721 1,865 2013 21,342 1,921 -Total revenue from Table 2. ** - 9% of revenues (i.e. the average of FY 2004, 2006, and 2007). Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 8/06 Capital improvements expenditures in excess of the available amounts projected in Table 10 likely will require the use of other sources listed above, or an increase in the percentage of revenues (9%) projected to be spent on capital expenditures. Policy 4.2 of the Capital Improvements element. limits general obligation debt to an amount equal to 5% or less of the Village's property tax base. In FY 2007, this would amount to $99.1 million in available general obligation debt. Policy 4.2 was last reviewed as part of the 2001 EAR-based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, using 1999 data. Since 1999, the Village's property tax base has increased from $771 million to a current (i.e. FY 2007) level of $1.98 billion. 5. Capital Spending Program. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan contained a 5-year Schedule of Improvements, and Policy 4.3 of the Capital Improvements element directs that it be updated on an annual basis. The Village has not updated the 5-year Schedule of Improvements on an annual basis, as directed; however, the Village includes a 5 -Year capital spending plan within the annual budget which can be used as a basis to initiate preparation of the 5i- year Schedule of Improvements as part of the current amendments to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 8 A summary of 5-year projected capital projects, by operating department, included within the FY 2008/2009 Budget is presented in Table 11. Most of the projects summarized in Table 11 are not necessary to maintain Village LOS standards, nor are they directed by the Comprehensive Plan. A further discussion of LOS-related or Comprehensive Plan- directed capital improvements is presented in Section C. Table 11 FY 2008/2009 Five-Year Capital Plan ($000) Government Funds Plan Element/Project (FY ' - `'~` 2009 - - 2010 s.~ 2011 ~ ~ 2012 2013 ~ , _ . Rio - - .~ = Com uter Hardware & Software 10.0 13.5 7.0 0.0 0.0 TY ~ J Com uter Hardware & Software 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Furniture & Fixtures 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 B~ c ~ ~- s ._- _ , - ~ __ Automotive 227.0 320.0 130.0 330.7 330.7 Machine & Equi ment 38.7 114.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Computer Hardware & Software 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Audio, Visual & Communications 5.9 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Construction & Renovations 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :. ra~ .. _ _ . ~ . , Automotive 0.0 404.0 271.3 340.8 246.8 Machine & Equipment 13.8 0.0 21.9 12.4 12.4 Construction & Renovations 340.0 450.7 495..8 509.0 545.3 _.. -~. tr - - - - Automotive 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a ro : ks. . ,---~ f ,. - .. #~ _ ~ - r ~~ Automotive 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Machine & Equipment 30.6 0.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 Construction 75.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 Computer Hardware & Software 2.5 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 Pla round & Outside E ui ment 28.5 60.0 60.0 60.0 60..0 ,,- . ~ t: - - .-a ~~ , ~ ~. ~ y ..~ - - -. ~~~_~ - Construction & Renovations 61.0 25.0 0.0 5,860.0 0.0 Source: Village of North Palm Beach FY 2008/09 Budget (pages 29, 35, 46, 57, 64, 75, 80, 102, and 103 of 125); LRM, Inc.; 11/08 9 6. Capital Improvements, LOS and Budget. Based upon the assessment of capital improvements funding potential, per Sections 4 and 5, above, it is concluded that the Village has the financial capability to finance planned capital projects during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 period with committed revenue sources. The Village should continue to prepare a 5 year capital budget plan considering the maintenance of level-of-service (LOS) standards, detailed revenue projections and changes in funding in order to adequately determine financial feasibility. Appropriate capital projects from the 5 year capital plan should be incorporated within the annual update to the 5 -Year Schedule of Improvements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Florida 2005 Growth Management Legislation (Senate Bill 360) added additional financial feasibility requirements for the Capital Improvements Element. Financial feasibility means that sufficient revenues are currently available, or will be available from committed funding sources (e.g. ad valorem taxes, impact fees, developer contributions, bonds, state and federal funds, etc.) which are adequate to fund the projected costs of capital improvements necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained. Revenue sources must be included in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements and be available during the planning period of the comprehensive plan. Additional key requirements include the following: • The Capital Improvements element must include a schedule of capital improvements which are necessary to ensure that adopted level-of service standards are achieved and maintained. • For capital improvements that will be funded by a developer, financial feasibility must be demonstrated by an enforceable development agreement, and be reflected in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements. • If the local government uses a planned revenue source that requires a referendum or other actions to secure the source, the plan must identify other existing revenue sources in the event that the required actions do not occur. • The schedule of improvements must include transportation improvements included in the Metropolitan Planning Organization's transportation improvement program if those improvements are required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. 10 The schedule of improvements must be reviewed on an annual basis to the maximum extent feasible, and modified as necessary, in order to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. • An amendment to the comprehensive plan is required to update the schedule of improvements on an annual basis, or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction of any facility in the schedule of improvements. Amendments implementing these requirements must be filed no later than December 1, 2008, as well as each successive year thereafter. The Village's Capital Improvement element and 5-year schedule of improvements will need to be amended to comply with the new requirements. C. Level of Service Analysis. The Village has adopted LOS standards for infrastructure services in Table 11-1 of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. LOS standards are normally used to assess the impacts of any development on public facilities. Per the Village's land development regulations, developers are required, by contractual agreement with the provider, to finance necessary capital improvements. It is anticipated that any demands resulting from growth or redevelopment will continue to be addressed in this manner. The application of LOS standards to projected Village population is also used as one basis to identify existing and future capital improvements needs. Village population projections used to determine infrastructure needs are presented in Table 12. Table 12 -Fiscal Year Population Projections Component 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Resident 12,553* 12,822 13,091 13,091 13,091 13,091 Seasonal** ~ 1,473 1,504 1,535 1,535 1,535 1,535 Total 14,026 14,326 14,626 14,626 14,626 14,626 * -University of Florida estimate. ** -Peak-day seasonal population. Source: Village of North Palm Beach 1. Sanitary Sewer -Sanitary sewer service within the corporate limits is not directly provided by the Village. With the exception of a few remaining septic tanks, sanitary sewer service, including collection, transmission and disposal is provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (Seacoast). Seacoast directly bills residents within the Village using its services. 11 Seacoast is a publicly owned water and sewer utility serving approximately 57,302 homes and businesses in northeast Palm Beach County, with an approximate population of 97,000 residents. The 1988 interlocal agreement establishing Seacoast vests governing authority in its five member board, consisting of Palm Beach County and four participating municipalities. Board members are appointed by the political jurisdictions, with voting shares based upon general capacity use as follows: Palm Beach Gardens - 49%; Palm Beach County - 26%; North Palm Bach - 16%; Lake Park - 7%; and Juno Beach - 2%. The PGA Regional wastewater treatment plant., which provides service to the participating governments, has a current design capacity of 12.0 mgd. Average annual daily flow (AADF) is 8.15 mgd and maximum daily flow (MDF) is 9.9 mgd. Related to the approval of development orders, Seacoast requires developers to upgrade the capacity of existing systems or build new systems to meet their .needs in order to ensure that capacity is available. Current wastewater use by the Village is estimated at 1,323,171 gallons per day (i.e. population of 12,553 residents x 107 gallons per capita per day). It is projected that the Village's wastewater needs, using population projections (13,091 residents) prepared in the Village's 2006 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and the Seacoast LOS, will attain a level of 1,400,737 gallons per day by 2010 (i.e. during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 planning period), by which time buildout is projected to occur. The Village's adopted LOS standard for wastewater treatment and disposal is as follows: Average Day Generation: Residential - 66 gallons/capita/day; Non-residential - 1,060 gallons/acre/day. Maximum Day Generation: Residential - 104 gallons/capita/day; Nonresidential - 1,721 gallons/acre/day. Per the Capital Improvements element, the above generation rates are to be used for planning purposed for the Village. Actual determination of flow rates used as the basis for plant capacity, main extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual property owners and Seacoast. The Village has continued to implement its policy of prohibiting central wastewater service in Planning Area 1 (i.e. ".Non-Service Area"). The Village is meeting its LOS standard for sanitary sewer service, and no additional improvements to the PGA Regional wastewater treatment plant are required to serve the projected buildout situation during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 period. 12 Since the wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal facilities are owned, operated and maintained by Seacoast, the Village has no responsibility or authority to provide for system improvements. 2. Potable Water - Potable water service within the corporate limits, including treatment and distribution is also provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (Seacoast). Seacoast directly bills residents within the Village using its services. Seacoast owns and operates two treatment plants; the Richard Road facility, with a peak-day capacity of 7.5 mgd and the Hood Road facility, with apeak-day capacity of 23.0 mgd. Combined, the two facilities currently produce an average of approximately 18.3 mgd. According to the report entitled Preliminary Design Evaluation for Modifications to the Hood Road and Richard Road Water Treatment Plants (December 2005), the current treatment facilities have the capacity to serve projected buildout of that portion of the Seacoast service area located east of the C-18 Canal, including North Palm Beach. Future expansion may be necessary depending upon development approvals to the west of the C-18 Canal. Related to the approval of development orders, Seacoast requires developers to upgrade the capacity of existing systems or build new systems to meet their needs in order to ensure that capacity is available. Current potable water use by the Village is estimated at 2,397,762 gallons per day (i.e. population of 12,553 residents x 191 gallons per capita per day). It is projected that the Village's potable water needs, using population projections (13,091 .residents) prepared in this EAR, and the Seacoast LOS, will attain a level of 2,500,381 gallons. per day by 2010 (i.e. during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 planning period), by which time buildout is projected to occur. The Village's adopted LOS standard for potable water consumption is as follows: Average Day Generation: Residential - 99 gallons/capita/day; Non-residential - 1,874 gallons/acre/day. Maximum Day Generation: Residential - 147 gallons/capita/day; Nonresidential - 2,782 gallons/acre/day. Per the Capital Improvements element, the above generation rates are to be used for planning purposes for the Village. Actual determination of flow rates used as the basis for plant capacity, main extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual property owners and Seacoast. The Village has continued to implement its policy of prohibiting central potable water service in Planning Area 1 (i.e. "Non-Service Area"). 13 The Village is meeting its LOS standard for potable water consumption, and no additional improvements to the Seacoast regional potable water treatment plants are required to serve the projected buildout situation during the FY 2009 - FY 2013 period. Since the potable water withdrawal, treatment and distribution facilities are owned, operated and maintained by Seacoast, the Village has no responsibility or authority to provide for system improvements. 3. Solid Waste -The Sanitation Division of the Public Services Department offers collection service 3-times per week to all single family and multi-family residences within the Village. The Village also collects commercial solid wastes with the exception of certain large restaurants, which contract directly with a private hauler. Costs for these services are recovered through ad valorem taxes and no additional fees are charged to residents to finance this service. Waste is transported to the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority facility on Dyer Boulevard. The Village also provides additional service for the separate collection of newspapers on a once per week basis. The Village sells the newspapers to a local purchaser. The Village does not provide collection service for construction sites; individual developers are responsible for collecting and disposing of wastes generated on their properties. The Village owns, operates and maintains its own equipment for solid waste collection. The Village Sanitation Division has packer trucks each with a twenty cubic yard capacity, satellite collection Qitney) trucks with one and one-half ton capacity, and one sedan. The Village's adopted LOS standard for solid waste collection and disposal is as follows: Average Generation Rate: Residential: Single-Family - 0.926 tons/capita/year; Multiple-Family - 0.588 tons/capita/year; Non-Residential - 6.0 tons/acre/year According to recent correspondence, Solid Waste Authority disposal facilities can accommodate the Village's needs through the year 2020. The Sanitation Division is responsible for providing solid waste collection and transfer services for the Village. Routine maintenance for all Village vehicles is performed by the Fleet Maintenance Division. Capital costs associated with maintaining the Village's LOS standard include the purchase or lease of collection fleet vehicles and major purchases related to maintenance facilities. Capital expenditures have historically been considered on an annual "as-needed" basis. The Village is meeting its LOS standard for solid waste collection and disposal services. However, future improvements are necessary to maintain the current level of service. Additional improvements required during the 2009 - 2013 period are itemized in Table 13. 14 Table 13 -List of Solid Waste Capital Improvements Projects Village Comprehensive Plan Consistency Department Description/Location (Objective/Policy Citation) Sanitation Garbage TrucksNillage-Wide Policy 3.1.1, Infrastructure Element Policy 1.4.b, Capital Improvements Element Sanitation Lightning LoaderNillage-Wide Policy 3.1.1, Infrastructure Element Policy 1.4.b, Capital Improvements Element Source: Village of North Palm Beach FY 2009 Budget (FY 2009 - FY 2013 Capital Plan). 4. Storm Water Drainage -The Streets .Maintenance Division is responsible for maintaining the Village's drainage system, including administration of the NPDES permit program. The entire Village discharges its storm water into tidal waters. There are four main tidal bodies into which storm water is discharge by the Village: (1) the Earman River; (2) the North Palm Beach Waterway; (3) the Intracoastal Waterway; and (4) the northern portion of Lake Worth. A complete and integrated ground surface percolation and positive underground piping storm water drainage system is installed throughout the platted and developed areas of North Palm Beach. The storm water drainage system is Village-owned and maintained. The system, in residential areas, consists of roadside swales without curbs and gutters. Surplus water from the swales is diverted to catch basins within a closed conduit piping system then discharged via outfall to the manmade waterways, the Earman River, the Intracoastal Waterway, or Lake Worth. The commercial areas of the Village are confined to frontages along U.S. #1 and Northlake Boulevard. These roads are urbanized and have curbs and gutters and positive pipe outfalls to either the Earman River or Lake Worth. This system is maintained by the Florida State Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Village. The Village does not have a master drainage plan. The existing drainage system was built in a piece-meal fashion over time with the majority of the existing system having been constructed between 1956 and 1970. Therefore, the major portion of the Village's storm water drainage system was constructed prior to any discharge regulations. The Village's adopted LOS standard for drainage is as follows: Design Storm: 3-Year frequency, 24 hour duration (one-day); Rainfall intensity curve, as established by the South Florida Water Management District. 15 According to a prior Village engineering consultant, the drainage system was, more than likely, designed similar to a Florida Department of Transportation system with a minimum three year storm recurrence interval. The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) minimum drainage design criterion for local governments is a three- year, one day duration storm event. It is therefore determined that the design capacity and the level of service is estimated to be at least satisfactory to meet the SFWMD minimum local government criteria. As a result, the capacity of the system appears to be adequate for the Village. The Village maintains scheduled inspections and maintenance to assure long-term effectiveness. Currently, the Village inspects each catch basin within the Village at least once per year and identifies needed maintenance and improvements. Capital costs associated with maintaining the Village's LOS standard include catch-basin and storm drain system repairs and replacement of damaged or inefficient or inadequate storm drainage system components. Capital expenditures have historically been considered on an annual "as-needed" basis. The Village is currently meeting its LOS standard for stormwater drainage, and no additional improvements are currently required during the 2009 - 2013 period. However, "place holder" Table 14 is included so that projects may be addressed in future years. Table 14 -List of stormwater Capital Improvements Projects Village Department Description/Location Comprehensive Plan Consistency (®bjective/Policy Citation) NA NA NA Source: Village of North Palm Beach FY 2009 Budget (FY 2009 - FY 2013 Capital Plan). 5. Roadways -The Village's principal roadway system is comprised of the following: Urban Minor Arterial - U.S. Highway 1, Northlake Boulevard and Alternate A-1-A; and Urban Collector -Prosperity Farms Road, Lighthouse Drive and A-1-A. The Comprehensive Plan currently classifies Village roadways based upon the number of traffic signals per mile and related driving times, an alternative methodology previously permitted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. LOS standards consistent with the alternative methodology were also adopted, as follows: "Average Annual Daily/Peak Hour LOS Standards at D/D, consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation minimum acceptable operating levels of service standards, for listed Village roadways, and Level-of-Service D traffic volumes (i.e. Tables 4-1 and 4-2 of the Transportation element)". 16 By Comprehensive Plan amendment, the Village designated Prosperity Farms Road, between Northlake Boulevard and Burns Road a constrained facility and not subject to the Village-wide LOS standards, and designated the roadway a Constrained Roadway at a Lower Level of Service (GRACES) facility. Development orders impacting the GRACES segment are evaluated using the following specific level of service standards: AADT - 20,950 trips; and Peak Hour - 1,948 trips. It was further determined that before Prosperity Farms Road, between Northlake Boulevard and Burns Road may be constructed as a 4 or 5 lane facility the following must occur: (1). The GRACES volumes on this roadway segment must be reached; and (2) the parallel segment of Alternate A1A must be a 6-lane facility and operate below its adopted level-of-service; or (3) the parallel segment of U.S. Highway No. 1 must operate below its adopted level-of-service. The Village's current LOS standards, with the exception of those adopted for Prosperity Farms Road under the GRACES designation, are inconsistent with those used by Palm Beach County to implement the countywide Traffic Performance Stahdards of the Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). The countywide system uses the State functional classification system and peak-hour traffic volumes to determine levels-of- service. As a result, for the purposes of this analysis, the countywide system is used to determine the Village's current level-of-service. Further, per direction of its EAR, the Village will update its LOS standards at the time of the EAR-based amendments., to become consistent with the County system. Using traffic count data supplied by the Palm Beach County and peak-hour LOS D traffic volumes provided in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards section of the ULDC (Table 13B), it is concluded that all of the Village's primary roads are currently operating an acceptable level-of-service. Available traffic count data and alevel-of service comparison for the Village's primary road system are presented in Table 15. Table 15 -Roadway Level-of-Service Analysis A. Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day) Roadway Lanes Count Station From - To 2008 AADT Volume LOS "D" Volume A-1-A 2L 2816 Lost Tree Villa a to Island Dr. 11,700 14,900 U.S. 1 4LD 2838 PGA to McLaren 26,304 32,500 U.S. 1 6LD 2832 McLaren to Northlake 30,101 48,900 U.S. 1 4LD* 2800 Northlake to Park Ave. 29,813 32,500 Northlake 6LD 2819 US 1 to Southwind 28,661 48,900 Northlake 6LD 2817 Southwind to Prosperit Farms 36,100 48,900 Northlake 6LD 2821 Prosperit Farms to Alt A-1A 32,300 48,900 Alt. A-1-A 4LD 2814 Northlake to Li hthouse 23,434 32,500 Prosperity Farms 3L 2806 Northlake to Lighthouse 16,426 20,950** Prosperity Farms 3L 2836 Lighthouse to Burns 18,270 20,950** Prosperity Farms 5L 2839 Burns to PGA 21,762 32,500 17 F3. Peak-Hour Traffic (vehicles per hour) Roadway Lanes Count Station From - To 2008 Peak- Hour Volume LOS "D" Volume A-1-A 2L 2816 Lost Tree Village to Island Dr. N/A 1,390 U.S. 1 4LD 2838 PGA to McLaren 2,252 3,020 U.S. 1 6LD 2832 McLaren to Northlake 2,732 4,550 U.S. 1 4LD* 2800 Northlake to Park Ave. 2,660 3,020 Northlake 6LD 2819 US 1 to Southwind 2,311 4,550 Northlake 6LD 2817 Southwind to Prosperity Farms NIA 4,550 Northlake 6LD 2821 Prosperity Farms to Alt A- 1A N/A 4,550 Alt. A-1-A 4LD 2814 Northlake to Li htfiouse 1,973 3,020 Prosperity Farms 3L 2806 Northlake to Lighthouse 1,490 1,948** Prosperity Farms 3L 2836 Lighthouse to Burns 1,630 1,948** Prosperity Farms 5L 2839 Burns to PGA 1,898 3,020 -North of Palmetto Road. *~` ~-Adopted GRACES LOS standard Source: Section 15. (I).D., Table 1A; Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (Traffic Performance Standards); Palm Beach County Traffic Division Historic Traffic Growth Table, 2008; Land Research .Management, Inc., 12/08. The Streets Maintenance Division is responsible for maintaining local sidewalks, roads and bridges within the Village. Capital costs associated with maintaining the Village's LOS standard include repair and replacement of sidewalks, streets, traffic signs and bridges, and administration of the annual asphalt overlay (street re-surfacing) program. Capital expenditures have generally been considered on an annual "as-needed" basis. However, major improvements, such as the Lighthouse Bridge repairs, are planned in advance. No roadway improvements are currently required during the 2009 - 2013 period. However, future improvements are necessary to maintain the current level of service. Additional improvements required during the 2009 - 2013 period are itemized in Table 16 18 Table 16 -List of Roadway Capital Improvements Projects Village Department Description/Location Comprehensive Plan Consistency (Objective/Policy Citation) Streets Road Overlay/Village-wide Objective 2 and Policies 7.1 and 7.3,Transportation Element, and Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements Element Streets Sidewalk replacement Objectives 4 and 13, Transportation Element Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements.-Element Source: Village of North Palm Beach FY 2009 Budget (FY 2009 - FY 2013 Capital Plan). 6. Recreation and Open Space -The minimum acceptable LOS standard for Village recreation and open space is three acres per 1,000 population. A comparison of data from Table 17 (excluding the North Palm Beach Country Club acreage), with the Village's current population (47.88 acres/12,553 residents) indicates that North Palm Beach is currently providing 3.8 acres per 1,000 population and meeting its LOS standard. The projected level-of-service at buildout (13,091 residents/3.0 acres/1,000 population) is 3.66 acres per 1,000 population. The projected level-of-service will exceed the adopted Village's LOS standard. Table 17 -Recreation and Open Space Facilities Facility Name Classification Acres North Palm Beach Count Club Communit 150.42 Communit Center Communit 12.64 Anchora e Park Nei hborhood 11.66 Anchora e Marina Nei hborhood 9.11 Lake Side Park Nei hborhood 6.97 Osborne Park Nei hborhood 7.50 Total Acres 198.3 Source: Land Research Management, Inc.; 12/08. The Leisure Services Department is responsible for maintaining parks and library facilities within the Village and the Anchorage Marina and Storage Facility. Capital costs associated with maintaining the Village's LOS standard include renovation, upgrading and expansion of facilities and purchase of additional equipment and facilities. Operations and improvements at the North Palm Beach Country Club, although owned and operated by the Village, are accounted for in a separate enterprise fund. Included operations are golf and food and beverage. Previous tennis and pool operations have been transferred to the Village's recreation function. 19 Capital expenditures have generally been considered on an annual "as-needed" basis. However, major improvements, including those funded by grants or loans, are planned in advance. No recreation and open space improvements are currently required during the 2009 - 2013period. However, future improvements are planned to .maintain the current level of service and increase the number of facilities. Additional improvements planned during the 2009 - 2013 period are itemized in Table 18. 'fable 18 -List of Recreation & Open Space Capital Improvements Projects Village Comprehensive Plan Consistency Department Description/Location (Objective/Policy Citation) Recreation 15 Passenger Van/Village-wide Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Parks Reel Mower (2)/Village-wide Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Pool Resurface Pool/Country Club Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Recreation Anchorage Park Objective 7, Recreation & Open Space Renovation/Anchorage Park Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation Playground equipment/Village-wide Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation Playground surfacing/Village-wide Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Tennis Outside equipment/Country Club Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element Library Carpet Replacement/Library Policy 2.1 Recreation & Open Space EI Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Library New Library & Furnishings/Library Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element, Source: Village of North Palm Beach FY 2009 Budget (FY 2009 _ FY 2013 Capital Plan). 20 D. Five-Year Schedule of Improvements The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and Five-Year Schedule of Improvements is to identify the capital improvements necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan and ensure that adopted level-of-service (LOS) standards are achieved and maintained for concurrency related facilities (transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation and public schools). If LOS standards are not met, concurrency management requires a local government to deny applications for development orders and permits until the deficiency is addressed. The Five-Year Schedule must address deficiencies and be financially feasible. The 2005 Growth Management Legislation (Senate Bill 360) added additional financial feasibility requirements for the Capital Improvements Element. Financial feasibility means that sufficient revenues are currently available, or will be available from committed funding sources (e.g. ad valorem taxes, impact fees, developer contributions, bonds, state and federal funds, etc.) which are adequate to fund the projected costs of capital improvements necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained. Revenue sources must be included in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements and be available during the planning period of the comprehensive plan. Objective 1 of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan directs the Village to prepare aFve-Year Schedule of Improvements, and Policy 4.3 directs that it be updated on an annual basis. Components of the Schedule of Improvements 1. Fiscal Responsibility The annual budget serves as the foundation for the Village's financial planning and control systems. All departments are required to submit requests for appropriations, including capital projects, to the Village Manager. Requests are the starting point for developing a proposed budget, which is then presented to the Council for review and approval. The legal level of budgetary control over expenditures is maintained at the fund level in order to ensure compliance with finance-related requirements. In general, the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements must include those improvements projects for which the local government has fiscal responsibility. Per state law, North Palm Beach must also include some additional projects for which the Village has no fiscal responsibility, such as school facilities, water supply improvements, certain transportation projects, and privately financed projects necessary to maintain adopted LOS standards. 2. Time Period The Five-Year Schedule of Improvements must be divided into five one-year (fiscal year) periods. The current Five-Year Schedule of Improvements encompasses the FY 2008/09 to 2012/13 period. 21 3. Project Description and General Location The Five-Year Schedule of Improvements must include the following four categories of capital improvements: • Those that are necessary to maintain adopted LOS standards and are the responsibility of the Village of North Palm Beach (Ref: Table 19A). • Those that are necessary to maintain adopted LOS standards and are the responsibility of private parties (Ref: Table 19B). • Those that implement non-LOS Comprehensive Plan directives and are the responsibility of the Village of North Palm Beach (Ref: Table 19C). • Public schools, water supply facilities, and transportation facilities that are the responsibility of other agencies :(Ref: Table 19D). Each project in the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements must include a general description and a citation of Comprehensive Plan consistency. Project descriptions must be specific enough to demonstrate consistency with facility needs identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Table 19 -Summary of Capital Improvements Projects A. -Necessary to Maintain LOS Standards: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan Project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency Element (Objective/Policy Citation) Policy 3.1.1, Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Sanitation 1/Garbage truck replacement (2) PoliC 1.4.b, Ca Ital Im rovements y p p Element Policy 3.1.1, Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Sanitation 2/Lightning Loader (2) Policy 1.4.b, Capital Improvements Element Objective 2 and Policies 7.1 and Transportation Transportation 1/Road overlay 7.3,Transportation Element, and (resurface) (2) Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements Element Objectives 4 and 13, Transportation Transportation Transportation 2/Sidewalk Element replacement (2) Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements Element Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element Recreation & Open Space Pool 1/Resurface pool (2) Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element, Recreation & Open Space Recreation 4/Playground surfacing (1) Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element (1) -Existing Deficiency (2) -Replacement Project (3) - To Meet Future Need 22 B. -Improvements Necessary to Maintain LOS Standards: Private Parties Comprehensive Plan Project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency Element (Objective/Policy Citation) NA NA NA (1) -Existing Deficiency; (2) -Replacement Project; (3) - To Meet Future Need C. -Non-LOS Comprehensive Plan-Directed Improvements: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency Element (Objective/Policy Citation) Recreation & Open Space Recreation 1/15 Passenger Van (2) Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Parks 1/Reel Mowers (2) Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Recreation 2/Anchorage Park Objective 7, Recreation & Open Space Renovation (3) Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Recreation 3/Playground equipment Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space (3) Element, Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Tennis 1/Outside equipment (2) Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element Library 1/Carpet Replacement/Library Policy 2.1 Recreation & Open Space EI Recreation & Open Space (2) Policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Library 2/New Library & Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Furnishings/Library (2/3) Element, (1) -Existing Deficiency ; (2) -Replacement Project; (3) - To Meet Future Need D. -Other Required Improvements: Other ~4gencies Project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency Public Agency (Objective/Policy Citation) Palm Beach County School District 5-Year Capital Budget School District (Ref: Attachment A) (2/3) Statutory Requirement Metropolitan Planning Parker Bridge Repair/Rehab Organization (MPO) -1* MPO #4124921 (2) Statutory Requirement Metropolitan Planning Anchorage Park Wildlife Overpass Organization (MPO) - 2* MPO #4221751 (1) Statutory Requirement Metropolitan Planning Northlake Blvd. Safety Project (1) Organization (MPO) - 3* MPO #4230151 Statutory Requirement Metropolitan Planning Northlake Blvd. Landscaping (1) Organization (MPO) - 4* MPO #4180371 Statutory Requirement * - Project included in the FY 2009 - 2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) of the MPO. (1) -Existing Deficiency ;(2) -Replacement Project; (3) - To Meet Future Need 23 4. Project Costs and Schedule Rule 9J-5.003(12), Florida Administrative Code defines "capital improvements" as physical assets which are large-scale and high in cost; generally non-recurring and may require multi-year financing. The Village of North Palm Beach has defined a capital improvement (Ref: Policy A1.1 of the Capital Improvements Element) as a large-scale project costing $10,000 or more. Normal maintenance activities are not included. Costs assigned to projects identified in Tables 19A - 19D and scheduling are presented in Table 20. Table 20 -Schedule and Cost of Capital Improvements Projects Project Fiscal Year Cost Total Cost Number" 2008!09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 (Dollars) Sanitation-1 0 169,400 183,340 204,974 204,974 765,688 Sanitation-2 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Streets-1 300,000 330,000 363,000 363,000 399,300 1,755,300 Streets-2 40,000 120,697 132,768 146,044 146,044 585,553 Recreation-1 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Recreation-2 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000 Recreation-3 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Recreation-4 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 135,000 Parks-1 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 30,000 Pool-1 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 Tennis-1 13,500 0 0 0 0 13,500 Library-1 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Library-2 0 0 0 5,760,000 0 5,760,000 Totals 443,500 1,435,097 1,239,108 7,049,018 1,325,318 11,492,041 * - Refer to Tables 19A -19D. Source: Village of North Palm Beach 2009 Budget (FY 2009 - FY 2013 5-Year Capital Plan); LRM, Inc., 12/08. 5. Revenue Sources Revenue sources that will be used to fund each project must be indicated in the Five- Year Schedule of Improvements. Projections of available Government Funds revenues during the 2008/09 - 2012/13 period are presented in Table 10. Capital improvements costs that exceed those projections must be funded by additional Government Funds revenues, deductions from the undesignated fund balance, or non-operating revenue sources. Alternatively, the Village may elect to fund improvements by alternative sources even if Government Funds revenues are available. Additional sources of revenue include bonds; federal., state and local grants; special assessments; impact fees and developer contributions; etc. In order for the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements to be financially feasible, sufficient revenues must be available from "committed funding sources" for projects scheduled during the initial three years. Projects in Years 4 and 5 may be scheduled from revenue sources that are either "committed" or "planned". A "committed" funding source is one which is available for and dedicated to financing capital improvements included in the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements, and based upon expected revenues from an existing source. A "planned" funding source is one that is not currently available to the Village to fund capital improvements. A "planned" revenue source is one which requires a referendum, 24 grant funding decision, bond issue, loan agreement, or other action to secure the source. Once the required action occurs, the revenue source becomes "committed". The use of "planned" revenue sources in the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements should be accompanied by appropriate policies in the Capital improvements Element oriented to securing the source. Revenue sources for planned capital improvements are presented in Table 21, including a determination of whether each source is committed or planned. Table 21 -Revenue Sources for Capital Improvements Projects Project Revenue Fiscal Year Bud get ($) Total Cost Number* Source 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 (Dollars) Sanitation-1 GF(1) 0 169,400 183,340 204,974 204,974 765,688 Sanitation-2 GF(1) 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Streets-1 GF(1) 300,000 330,000 363,000 363,000 399,300 1,755,300 Streets-2 GF(1) 40,000 120,697 132,768 146,044 146,044 585,553 Recreation-1 GF(1) 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Recreation-2 GF/G (1)(3) 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000 Recreation-3 GF(1) 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Recreation-4 GF(1) 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 135,000 Parks-1 GF(1) 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 30,000 Pool-1 GF(1) 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 Tennis-1 GF(1) 13,500 0 0 0 0 13,500 Library-1 GF(1) 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Library-2 LN (3) 0 0 0 5,760,000 0 5,760,000 Totals 443,500 1,435,097 1,239,108 7,049,018 1,325,318 11,492,041 Revenue Sources: GF -General Fund; GT -Gas Tax; Impact Fees - IF; G -Grant; ST -'/2 Cent Sales Tax; WS -Water and Sewer Fund; SF - Stormwater Fund; SA -Special Assessment; LN -Loan. (1) -Committed Revenue Source (2) -Planned Revenue Source (3) - To be determined. * - Refer to Tables 19A -19D. Source: Village of North Palm Beach 2009 Budget (FY 2009 - FY 2013 5-Year Capital Plan); LRM, Inc., 12/08. 6. Financial Feasibility Information presented in this analysis indicates that proposed capital improvements for the first three years are financially feasible. The Village should continue to update Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements on an annual- basis, considering changes in LOS, detailed revenue projections and changes in funding priorities in order to adequately determine financial feasibility. E. Capital Improvements Element Amendments Several Capital Improvements Element amendments are necessary to meet the state- mandated requirements. Necessary amendments include the following: The Capital Improvements Element must include a schedule of capital improvements which are necessary to ensure that adopted level-of service standards are achieved and maintained. Section 11.4.1 of the Capital Improvements Element incorporates the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements. It is recommended that Section 11.4.1 be amended in order to update the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements, as follows: 25 11.4.1 Five-Year Schedule of Improvements The North Palm Beach Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements for Fiscal Years ~°Q-,~°~~0 2009 through'^^~"~4 2013 is presented in T-~;e-1~°,. Tables 11-Z to 11-4. The School District of Palm Beach County ~ Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule for Fiscal Years 2-A8a- 2009 through X886 2013 is presented in T^h'~--,Ti-o. A review of other Comprehensive Plan elements leads to the conclusion that the Capital Improvements element Goal, Objectives and Policies and the 5 Five -Year Schedule of Improvements are internally consistent. Table 11-2 - Summary of Capital Improvements Projects A. -Necessary to Maintain LOS Standards: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan Element Project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency (ObiectiveLPolicy Citation) Infrastructure Sanitation 1/Garbage truck replacement (2) Policy 3.1.1. Infrastructure Element Policy 1.4.b. Capital Improvements Element Infrastructure Sanitation 2/Lightning Loader (2) Policy 3.1.1, Infrastructure Element policy 1.4.b. Capital Improvements Element Transportation Streets 1/Road overlay (resurface) (2) Objective 2 and Policies 7.1 and 7.3.Transportation Element, and Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements Element Objectives 4 and 13. Transportation Element Transportation Streets 2/Sidewalk replacement (2) Policy 1.2 Capital Improvements Element Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element Recreation & Open Space Pool 1/Resurface pool (2) policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Policy 2.1. Recreation & Open Space Element. Recreation & Open Space Recreation 4/Playground surfacing (1) policy 1.2, Capital Improvements Element (1) -Existing Deficiency : (2) -Replacement Project; 3) - To Meet Future Need B. -Improvements Necessary to Maintain LOS Standards: Private Parties Comprehensive Plan Element Proiect No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency (Objective/Policy Citation) NA NA NA (1) -Existing Deficiency: (2) -Replacement Proiect; (3) - To Meet Future Need 26 Tabie 11-2 - Summary of Capital Improvements Projects (continued) C. -Non-LOS Comprehensive Plan-Directed Improvements: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan Element Project No. and .Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency (Objective/Policy Citation) Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element. Recreation & Open Space Recreation 1/15 Passenger Van (2) Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Policy 2.1, Recreation & Open Space Element. Recreation & Open Space Parks 1/Reel Mowers (2) .Policy 1.4, Capital Improvements Element Recreation & Open Space Recreation 2/Anchorage Park Renovation (3) Objective 7. Recreation & Open Space Element, Policy 1.4. Capital Improvements Element Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element, Recreation & Open Space Recreation 3/Playground equipment (3) Policy 1.4. Capital Improvements Element Recreation 8~ Open Space Tennis 1/Outside equipment (2) Policy 4.2, Recreation & Open Space Element Policy 2.1 Recreation & Open Space EI Policy Recreation & Open Space Library 1/Carpet Replacement/Library (2) 1.2, Capital Improvements Element Library 2/New Library & Furnishings/Libyan/ Policy 4.2. Recreation & Open Space Element, Recreation & Open Space 2/3 (1) -Existing Deficiency: (2) -Replacement Project: (3) - To Meet Future Need D. -Other Required Improvements: Other Aaencies Public Agency Project No. and Description Comprehensive Plan Consistency (AmountlYear) Palm Beach County School District 5-Year Capital Budget Statutory Requirement School .District ~ ef: Appendix A) (2/3) jRef: Appendix A) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) -1* Parker Bridge Repair/Rehab MPO #4124921 (2) Statutory Requirement 179/FY 2010) 200 ($9 , , Metropolitan Planning Anchorage Park Wildlife Overpass Statutory Requirement Organization (MPO) - 2* MPO #4221751 (1) 000 matchlFY2010) ($500 , Metropolitan Planning Northlake Blvd. Safety Project (1) Statutory Requirement Organization (MPO) - 3* MPO #4230151 046/FY 2010) ($840 , Metropolitan Planning Northlake Blvd. Landscaping (1) Statutory Requirement Organization (MPO) - 4* MPO #4180371 500/FY 2010) ($589 , * - Project included in the FY 2009 - 2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) of the MPO. (1) -Existing Deficiency ;(2) -Replacement Project; (3) - To Meet Future Need 27 Table 11-3 -Schedule and Cost of Capital Improvements Projects Project Fiscal Year Cost Total Cost Number* 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012113 Dollars Sanitation-1 0 169.400 183.340 204,974 204.974 765.688 Sanitation-2 0 200,000 0 0 0 200.000 Streets-1 300,000 330.000 363,000 363,000 399.300 1,755,300 Streets-2 40.000 120,697 132.768 146,044 146.044 585.553 Recreation-1 0 30.000 0 0 0 30.000 Recreation-2 0 500,000 500.000 500.000 500.000 2,000.000 Recreation-3 0 30.000 30.000 30,000 30.000 120,000 Recreation-4 15-,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30.000 135.000 Parks-1 0 0 0 15.000 15,000 30.000 Pool-1 75,000 0 0 0 0 75.000 Tennis-1 13,500 0 0 0 0 13.500 LibraN-1 0 25.000 0 0 0 25.000 Library-2 0 0 0 5.760,000 0 5.760,000 Totals 443,500 7,435,097 1,239,108 7,049,018 1,325,318 11,492,041 * - Refer to Table 11-2A -11-2D. Table 11-4 -Revenue Sources for Capital Improvements Projects Project Revenue Fis cal Year Bud get ($) Total Cost Number* Source 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012113 Dollars Sanitation-1 GF(1) 0 169,400 .183,340 204.974 204.974 765,688 Sanitation-2 GF(1) 0 200.000 0 0 0 200,000 Streets-1 GF(1) 300,000 330.000 363.000 363,000 399.300 1.755.300 Streets-2 GF(1) 40.000 120.697 132.768 146.044 146.044 585,553 Recreation-1 GF(1) 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Recreation-2 GF/G (1)(3) 0 500,000 500,000 500.000 500.000 2.000,000 Recreation-3 GF(1) 0 30,000 30.000 30,000 30.000 120,000 Recreation-4 GF(1) 15.000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30.000 135.000 Parks-1 GF(1) 0 0 0 15.000 15.000 30,000 Pool-1 GF(1) 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 Tennis-1 GF 1 13.500 0 0 0 0 13.500 Library-1 GF(1) 0 25.000 0 0 0 25.000 Library-2 LN (3) 0 0 0 5,760,000 0 5,760.000 Totals 443,500 1,435,097 1,239,108 7,049,018 1,325,318 11,492,041 Revenue Sources: GF -General Fund; GT -Gas Tax; Impact Fees - IF; G -Grant: ST -'/2 Cent Sales Tax WS -Water and Sewer Fund; SF - Stormwater Fund: SA -Special Assessment: LN -Loan. (1) -Committed Revenue Source: (2) -Planned Revenue Source: (3) - To be determined. * - Refer to Tables 11-2A- 11-2D, Source: Villa4e of North Palm Beach 2009 Budcaet (FY 2009 - FY 2013 5-Year Capital Plan): LRM. Inc., 12/08. For capital improvements that will be funded by a developer, financial feasibility must be demonstrated by an enforceable development agreement, and be reflected in the 5-year Schedule of Improvements. • Objective 3 of the Capital Improvements Element addresses the issue of capital improvements funding. It is recommended that Policies 3.4 and 3.5 be added to the Capital Improvements Element to read as follows: 28 Policy 3.4. For capital improvements to be funded by a developer, financial feasibility shall be demonstrated by an enforceable development agreement, and be reflected in the Five-near Schedule of Improvements. Policy 3.5. Financial feasibility means that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first 3 years., or will be available from committed or planned funding sources for years 4 and 5, of the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements. Committed sources of revenue shall include ad valorem taxes, bonds, state and federal funds, tax revenues, impact fees and developer contributions which are adequate to fund the protected costs of the capital improvements identified in the Comprehensive Plan necessary to ensure that adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained within the five-year period. • If the local government uses a planned revenue source that requires a referendum or other actions to secure the source, the plan must identify other existing revenue sources in the event that the required actions do not occur. Objective 3 of the Capital Improvements Element addresses the issue of capital improvements funding. It is recommended that Policy 3.6 be added to the Capital Improvements Element to read as follows: Policy 3.6. If the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements identifies a planned revenue source that requires a referendum or other action(s) to secure the source, the Comprehensive Plan shall identify an alternative existing revenue source(s) in the event that the required actions do not occur. • The schedule of improvements must include transportation improvements included in the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) transportation improvement program if those improvements are required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. Table 18 D, above, provides for the accommodation of MPO projects within the Village's Five-Year Schedule of Improvements. As there are no projects proposed within the corporate limits that are required to maintain the Village's LOS standards, none are included in the proposed Five-Year Schedule of Improvements amendments. The schedule of improvements must be reviewed on an annual basis to the maximum extent feasible and modified as necessary to maintain adopted level- of-service standards. Policy 1.1 and Policy 4.3 of the Capital Improvements Element requires that the Village develop, adopt and annually update afive-year capital improvements program. It is recommended that Policy 4.3 be amended to specifically reference the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements being added to the Element, as follows: Policy 4.3: As part of its budgeting process the the Village shall adopt and annually update the aFive -Year Schedule of Improvements, a primary purpose of which is to maintain the Village's adopted Level-of-Service (LOS) standards. The results of this update shall be incorporated within the five-year capital get plan as part of the annual Village budget process. 29 An amendment to the comprehensive plan is required to update the schedule of improvements on an annual basis, or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction of any facility in the schedule of improvements. It is recommended that Policy 4.3 of the Capital Improvements Element which requires that the City develop, adopt and annually update afive-year schedule of improvements be further amended to include the annual Comprehensive Plan amendment requirement. The full proposed amendment to Policy 4.3 reads as follows: Policy 4.3. As part of its budgeting process ~e the Village shall adopt and annually update the 5 Five -Year Schedule of Improvements, a primary purpose of which is to maintain the Village's adopted Level-of-Service (LOS) standards. The results of this update shall be incorporated within the five-year capital met plan as part of the annual Village budget process. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is required to update the five-year schedule of capital improvements on an annual basis, or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction of any facility in the schedule of improvements. Amendments implementing these requirements must be filed no later than December 1, 2008, as well as each successive year thereafter. The Village acknowledges the annual amendment requirement. The amendments to the Capital Improvements Element proposed to implement the requirements, presented in this subsection, are included in the ordinance being filed with this analysis. 30 APPENDIX A Palm Beach County School District Five-Year Capita! Budget 3~ N N L ~~ W +~ ,Y/ W L W ~~~+ ~~W/ LL ~_ ~~ W 4~..a 0 /~w I ~I' M 3` ~ O c+') 0 0 N ID CO N h h O W7 (~ CO r O CC1 [D CO h 6? r r N f,4 t.q c~ O ~ Q tl~ ti M M~(D ly' rCO6]O h N N er r O d' N [+) G LL] ~ O M CO 60 M O h LS] ti lC~ Cf1 47 W r O r CO O N ~[~r 4 t~[~NM 1~ ~ ~ N r 67 r r O O M N M r r ~ ~l' M I~ Cr 'c1' ~' O O 07 I` h O h[~O [I] rrr'O M r r O 61rr N L[]00MO Cp r r O N cY1 C (.p ~ u7 v0 Oi O ci d O o0 ~ N ~ N M O r.{) I~ O M 0 67 M 0 N a0 [~ Ep er M O cr 6~ ~ M r r {` r O r Lfj 00 N C+7 r O ~ ~ 47 N M M ~• O r [C7 f~ X 0 0 r h h M f~ O O CO ~ p r O CD lD CIJ O 6~MN ~ lOMMO N M M r r [+l 00 C+] EC1 CO r 0 0 C11 C] M CU ~~ ~' M N O In CD O N W 00 M O CO Lf] iti O r N M O M CA ~ M r hr ~ t OTNM O ~ ~ O ~ C O N M M ~ V NC+7 W I`rO0 O O O h ~+ r C4 !~ Ln Q r 0 CD O O r WMN 1D ~N[`7O O O O C6 O M ~ ~ CSI 00 67 87 O h O O 67 ~ EY O W O]OC+7O M O O N N O i!7 r CO Cp I~ h i.S j O] O O CO r Cp r O CQ N N N ~' CA CD d7 N N M ~ ~ M ~ tD tl0 O N '~ O O CO N O N CO I~ O h EC'f I1) r 0 h Q1 O D7 N W SD h M [q ~' M O N CQ O CO CO O ['r3 Cp ct N LS1 ~ O7 O tD r O r CO ~~ ~ Lfl O OMh 07 r QJ N M O f.Oa0]~tsy i!1 h M O N O M N CO r r Lfj C~ G O7 QS N C+") Y? M r I~ M r [ti r N r O ~' O N r r N N ~Y' i0 ~t Q1'. '~ i Q Ft.~fD~ Dd CD. ~ a0.~'S r~O~: I CA ~~C?~ ~ ~ ~Q ~~p~Q p,i ' ~. Q7 V ~ O' s Lfj~~fl rn O; TN 4 h r'~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 Fly t ¢' ~ C,ry O . ~i~ O N~ -~I ~d` ' ~?'' ) ~"~1, lDr, ~ ^ a W~ ~ Qf r N z~ u ~ M ' h. ~O g 54 ~ O f 4 'C}~F. _' r' 6)° v ~ i C f D' ~ Its ~~ 'rt _ ~ ~ ', i4~~ 'h1 ~` t ~ :.:LS'F~ ~ S ~. m M O O M ° ° m ~ y ~ w O_ o_ N N O d N } C L tll O O O O O O~ ~ _ M M M M CD ~ ~ EL t0 r ~ r ~ O m r O~°ca a ~ ~ rntoOO ~ m a ~ ~ N ~ a N ~ o ti L,{) i{} CO r N !f7 O 00 h C*1 O M 87 00 CD ~ W 00 V 1.L) O 6~ h M O C? O O] C3) ~i' M O7 I~ cD O 67 C"] CQ O C6 [D w r DO 67 O Gf~ l(S Q] O N 'li' q' O ~' 67 O N ~• 6] h V' C4 i0 O O O O O o0 M ~- W'1 V 65 CA N (D M Q m r ~' O ~' Cs M ~' r 6)rr C A ~ O N b O ~ n r r M ~ N N ~ U ~ ~ C ~ O CA C o c ~ M a N ~ ~ ~ (fl p a i U ~u C3 N a i ` ~ i [~ ~ N y ~ ~U ~ ~ 0 3 ~ O ~ ~ ~ d Hs .+ a ~ ~ O ~ N ~ ~. Q ~ o o N ~ a O '~ 1 4' W ~ ~ a b ~ N ~ ~'' Oi ~ Q7 L ~ U ~ ~ ~} C ~ V n~. V ~ ~ O d ~ W W i p b m~ ~ fC N ~'~~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~~ a O O o2S ~ C ~U ' ~ D7 - N N L ¢ O 11.1 ~ ~ OO m ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ !9 ~. a 1 Q o Q~ . ~ ~ ~ o O ~~ 0 Uc~~a.. ~ ~ coca 5 r.~ s ~ c~ ~ r a u ° i i p r n a _ [ u O n ti OY n[6 6.L M r 0 N 0 N ~~ 1i/ F~ L N_ L~ i O L ~~ W 0 ^~^ i.~! r~AA inf f~ V L~ r~ ~/ J rn ~ rn ~ ~ N Q1 N O1 4 i{7 ~ G r r N ~ , ~- O O r r m ~ ~ l i] 4 ")_ O N M1 r 1°r,°o o i LA ~ N l~ h r o0 00 0 ~ N M m c] ~ O N O l1] } ~ o 'd L{. O r 9D N ~ O O } ~ O LL O r N ti o a ~ H m ~ l L b N h f~ N i O h _ O~'1 M M O N ~~. - d - 1 1 1 i ~ •q F~-, - }•x'11 u sa F.f~y lp ~'? s m,~d~ Iq M ~' C7f r' r ' '-.FI ,~.I Q.- 1. ~! 1.~ I ~?ice I ~. ~ o !d (G - , L {3, 1 ,y,S - F I ,` ~ *~ + ~~+ ~ ~ ,Si i oirn r met Nam k d:.' ' jl O,'h s CO CO- ~~I ~: k I Qy.[~ ] 1 r~y~!_ • ~~~1 W ~ ~Cf - In 6 ~ lO lti~ f _~ . h r ~ N', ~ G1 00 o ~ ~ ~ - d' Or }v ~"+ .uy~~; s O~ ln' f+7 - O CO • h ~I gy ' ~ _ C. la .I a ~ ~;' tpl r h , a ~-i ., : ~ r I . - - m P 3 ~~ s vi u ~ 1 _ ~t 3 z ~ ~1l-+ -. ~ - ~[[ , Kh- - 544 1 5t: 1 M h O_ CO O fD O 67 EO Mnr h O C>h O cl' O ~ fD ~ O !n f0 d- d' O~ li3 O O m(O CD COrI+ Na0 hNOS h (600~0 O M hO f0 O c0 OIO NOOOO ~r Na6O lfJ O '~ Of _ O 6] h S'7 O LO ~#' O C~ V' Q) M N O CO O O t[1 N O O h M f+ C`3 r (`'1 m O O? COO m h N 6] O r C[3 M r In M if7 Id ~ O CO O~ CO Ei] O SO r li•] N O? cQ r V~ Y ti ~ SD M~~ N '%N ~ V N]` N O rN M M N M C'S CrJ r CC r O COMCO C4 C~1 f~~ O1Y7 P'? ~ N in ['~)NM ~M NM C7rC'A M r [~ O lD CO Gl M OD CO h r ID h {`7 N 6~ O W O CI' (fl h O lit M ~' ~' O W r (+) ~ O N ['7 M W ip O h ~3' N DO O h r N N O] M M O to GO t? O 1 ~ ' C'J N N 1 co + ~ OY [O N a0 Q> a0 O ~ r O CD I s li7 cp a0 O E[7 r_ 1~ OOACOM O lfJ~ h (+? t#• 6f M O r (D h 0 Ef] c[~ C1 co INMN Mrco 6l lC)O V r CO COO 41 h N 6~ O l1] [h Y I!] lit M O O M Ell h 0 d a0 O NCO ~ 4 CO V !n 00 a'S a0 r CO ~F r ]± ~ C4 [~ SO N O 6? N O O }..• sf r N M1 67 O C+'•) lh C*7 - ' h ap fA M O [A ~' M h r C'7 i0 4'1 M M C~7 M (''1 ' +' ' ' [7 [~[ M L J O [+7 {+ 7 [+ ] (7 r h M 7 r L N M M N [ ) V M N M V P . ~ N c • G C O ~- M ~ ~ ~ 6 G C [C d N . ~~ ~ _O ~ ~ C p m ~ ~ m ~ W O E ca ~' ~ b m °7 N p c is °~ ' O ~ LL N M ~ d N y M O x a it1 U - N ¢ O [6 s_ p .N a •C p N C G ~ N N ~ ~ C p N d ` O~ m' 'C 4 d N~~ ~ [ >„ d. O ' ~ (6 N + O O p O Q 0 N ~ , ~~ N N ~ L ~ L a 6 -O O O E E ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v In ~ 6l rp C 0 G1 ~ ~ d N E p •~ ~ ~ -q o W o p d E ~ ~ ~ ++ :o a~i E:o E a;E E~ Ez° m u CC a-°o~ m ar ~ °a~~ U o~~a v w i LLI LL NU ~ ~ a LLl ro'O N O ~ ~~~LLE (11~m N ~p ~ ~ N fn y o OL rn o~ ~~ ~ l m m~ W' m¢ W~ ~ m r ~ }J LSI O ~ ~ uJ E~ ~ w~ p~ o f !!J ,., ~~ a ~ p Q n U ~ ._ Q UJ m m m U~ ca m ~ i ~a ~ z H m~ a~ o ~ t ?~ ~~ o a a~ ~ o } ~rh ~~ ~ ` ~ m ~ U u] a L m o N~ mU ¢¢ m~~ ~e ~ o a m *° o ~ m ~+. o~ ~ p y • c:G~ m ~ m `6 us ~ x m U ~~~ ~ Y .~ .~ ~ :~ i E o l °~ °~ 3 a~ •Q ~' ~ m E ~ ,c ~ in ~„ [0 c4 00 m as d d d ~ a o ~ lrs s q} ~ ~ a -o iQ ~ m m m ~ o o m 'a o 0 o ` o ` d ~ Z E m~ c~~ ~~ 7 W ~~o-.dd~cAU3~~~7~ ~ UJ ~ v 0 d o ~ a a LL ~0~[0 [£1 ~ODUOf.~LC.C~ [)C7f.7 T ~-7ZZ h a N d T~ N O O N~~ YI i.~_ li L i[~ L fO i a ~~ L^ i~~! >~~ ~j ^~ U y~ MI N N W p N ~o N 0 E}+- o N rn L}L p O L ~ O ~ O ~ N a~ O r 0 0 0 0 r 0 ~ Q 7 r T N ~ a0 (D iD d' ~n ~ h h N N ~ O O IL'! p N a I Y h r M r C' ] rn r ~ [ ~( r d' rn a r Sri co N V ~f] d' co ~i o co N ~ ~ _ ~ . ~ pyC ~ • ,.- _ ~~ u. ~r~ iW h G C M r 1 Cq~, '~~ _. ~_ _ ~ 61 N~ ~ C- .~ ~~ x O ~, F` ,; ~ S S O~ as _ .xnP _ ~'`~. ~ - ,. N '-~1., 1 C - CQiY rt. ~ 1 ~~1~S~;~ '7.3 l ~ il! ~, ~ - 1 ~ ' ~'l, ' ~,f,~ ~? ~ ' O0 i'F 00 nom' r - ~ -C7 i - 'd' M 1., ~ . i ~ GG i N~' M1 ~ ' ~. ~ ~` i. nid. b~ r> ~s ~ . .~ ~ 1 .. 0001 Nr MMO tT rd'SO o0 f~a0 N N ISO NOd06a tf] ep~QaD NO Md'I~ N ap o0r0 r(flO0 f~ d'Or ' 47NaNr0 ' r ap O C7 N M Lf) O OD ' Y O ~ I~ f''7 ~ 'd_ O O 00 ) LCJ L7 P 7 M M ~ r ~ [ S'7NaCR M d' ('mo'd' N h ri V'LL7 <" oOOO ui O NOao opNmOtOO ~NOC7 r O Ord' N O O1 ap a71~d1i1r M Ntn0 d'tia d"tO 79 NO~1]~ aY C]OJ ('~ O O hhf']hrap l~ r (7NOO V ~C7 °7 d_Nm QdNCA (''76i r- N !4 ~ KS CSOr O O ~d'r- hOi COmY~C] (7 L~ N d• d [7 ~ r N r r r r r r r aoah Nin rornrn r d' 0I aq In 61 M r [+ OD N M ' N dw ~ L!7 Q1 d0 ' "' o~ '~c~rnm ii N O N ~ v O 47 ~ C'7 ~D M 0 0 0 m rN~ [' 7 N [' 7 ' W V ~ O .N ~ c C •C N ° O C ~ •- ~ d O N p ~ N ~ ~~ O w2 ~ _ .C ~ •~ Cp ~ ~ o p N W ` Q1 ~'~a~a N yn~'C N a°f~ma~i°O~'oE~E crt c~a ° W~=°~~UU ~ U` U` ~ c=° r c c a~ W ~ ~ ~ f/} al O ,O W - Y csi ~ Y ~ ~ E T m iu ~ ~ ~ ~ m D[3 m ~ OA ~ ~ O ~ N ¢ ~ c t0 N _ ^ 4 O ~ SL6 ~ U] ~ ~ 3 a O O O c+~ N rnlo mcncas~rno NONF~O otiornorn~no ap CO a0 cQ a [p d- O lti 0 d' O r- a LL7 N O N r 0 0 O 6] tt7 (D M cO d: 47 O ' a0 lf1 LL7 M li7 ' ' O C7 ('7 M 47 r ~ O M C7 V' N t6 O r 4[) O N N 0 ~ O CO h 47 O [Q O 0 Oa6 O1 [O a01~4~fD MrNI[7O Md-f~0 VcD fpr 4 [p (~ NP7 ltiru'7f ~Crl C+7N00 Od_~Jrn d'N aO P7 t;7 er G7 l~Cn OrNd Orr V r rN~SO L'7~llJ N r N r r r r- r r r C O N - Q N ~ ~ 6 Q `a c ~ d '- c Q f6 X, N O ~ ~ ~ ~ 47 W t3 ° ~ C EL c~ W ~a [~.5 ~1y rc ~ '~~ ~U p y C c 6,U '~ ~ ~'w°c-. ~Q ,E m~ Y.~ =YEW -o.o oY:o as... °'°•- ~ ~:~ ~aSC c ~ ~ ~ °~•~ 3 °~T3 ~-a.-mac O~U QafZ ~ .v d ¢ a O~x m ° a Qa Q Q E° E E a E~ •• 3 s [L V cv !.t -o s ¢ Ei ~ ~ o m ~ Q m U v~ rn .rn °Q :c ~ E ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ _ ~ E E aEi a a~ l11 W m W rn~ ~~ N Q V ~~ a W a a~ m~ v C tiYYUJ ~2TT ~W ~ iy W ~~ y ~ ~a%W EL LLI m~ N~ m N~~ CO ~ w~ G o a ~ 7 a~ o UJ o m c .~ C a w U C3 ~ W -- -- a o a ° ~ c c U' w ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ m U ° N ~ c = N o 0. 0. ~ c ~ to ~ T a N O f9 f9 fO c in as N m m~ ~- a a~~~ m ~' X QmmmO~OmmmmmUUUUUUURWliC72 ~ ~~-~i h ° M ~, l9 a M 'C" 0 N O N N ~. I~ L ,N W ~F L 0 L a ~~ O ~}J ^~ V O 0 0 0 s~ o ~ o °o N ~ O M h } o c' tr. a i N N ~ o ~ Q) d } r M I1 O ~,~ m m S o N O ~ 0 LL 7 O y, o ~ o w o m ti N r N M ~ O b O D O (p Q O O O O N O N O O } !L G V ~ b h ['7 N N N I''S - e- N O h O M O O r r ~fl M d] N O cQ ~f'7 d h O ~Si O r 4 m 0 LL7 40 [DN d 4 O(D 4]~ NQ)tfJ Lf]OOhMCOO N~rMo044 r[1[r rM0 dtOr CO ~r ~' CO YI V: WPM :t r O~ rNODOr ~ tIj M h h Q O N 61 QI S•7 ~ 03 fO 1~ h r 1~ O d ID ~ M ~J 4 t[3 00 ~ ~ sth~ ~~~ 4d' NN NN d~ M ~ KSrN61 NOrOu70N OO dif5 C6 NOTE u•1 V LC}O SSE COO M r T9~ 6111]r 4[iO O]00 fO apN '~ N W r•pp (per r 67r MsAN O lf1 6'7 t7'r 61MtiNMNd' Q r r r r r r NOh ddM4 Ocr r4Li M90M Q1QNOd0 N mh007S)OrOQ~4 ~~_ GO (ONOO O O~O~'ci' W OQNm ~i7 C3~00 M[DOON V rMCOO d rNr~rMO ~ drrGO [06i crr ~ h[fl lCl V OM~r 004fIrN000 rCp ~ 4[iMf~Nl~ o OfDQ)6lfV hM rnai~t~t~d"tiooiocDrnMUiauiooY ~' h V ~f] 47 47 O Pi N N li7 r N N 61 d' C7 ~t7 ffl N QI O N O r 0 47 O h O ~ aO ~l] op M N 4 h lA h u7 6~ V C6 N CO 6] N c+'7 r ~ d7 Gi ~Y7 r h ~fi Q1 65 cp CO oD LL7 d ~ O~r00 r(p~ OY' Nu]M~L] N~PQ ~M~~t rrQ1M h C•7N V' V r r N r r r r r r r N r T C ?, ro _ ~ ro N ~ E 4 N ~ d US ~ U ~ lO N ~ ,.. 'p 'CS .O ~ C~ ih h ~ ~' O 7 ~~ U U ~ Q Q v =oU ° m m d -Q EQQ ~ L d a ca¢=oin~~ _~ ~ b a ~ •~a ~L ~ ~T ~ o o ~ E •L o ~ aQ~Q-oaa ~ ~ ~Q `~ o•~ ~ aoi v ~~ E o c•? ro U 0. ~ a ~~ c c c ~~ m E rn as ~ aci ~ ~ .~ aroi v o a ~' •~_ `o L c E m¢{jcmob o Q~ 0?2~ o LL'atE¢mr''~n°iv-aa"aafl+m m ~ m ~ ow un.Q. m= E ~ ~ w~ o ° ~ a,v~rnmU)QQ¢ a ~,ulw E E E a m., m my m o ~w a~ N ~+ E ~~~~ v o 0 o v m ~w ~~ ~a ~ m N2ZZ ~~ _rn~Est ~ c m ro ._ ._ . Q~ U U U E~ -t E~ .c J J a cn , a~ rn rn •- -°w.cr-c-YU troi croi chi ~ m-~ al rnrn~t ro~ 'z~ } a y-o"o ~ ~wSS ~° -a •C ~ -~ c`a c c c c w m Z LfJ Y 2 ~~ sa w E o~ U' ~~ v v as m c c c c' c ~ Q o 0 o p. c trs cp ro ro m m o m ro m~ w~ Q Q o o a -c a ~ aci v aci °~ s 'Q, s% see x m m m ~ 0. 0 ~ ,? ~ , n a~ m ^ ^ ~ c ~ va, N .°= ~ ~ a~i ~ ~ m c c•~ ~ m Es°~-°c E E o any E rn ~ ~ ~ ~~E-=`"'~•- ~~ m m m~ ~.ro m m mx?' m ro ro ro m m o ro o cn a Q o.-- °1 w `~ ~'c ~~JJJJJ ~~~~OOLL a.aa d~~mu~~v~cnw>j~~~~~~ ~ N h r T 0 w c a U m h 0 ro 0. M N 1 N N ~e V N_ ~~ L L ^~ W O L ~~ ^ w.r U O ~' {~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ !(~ ~ O ~ ~^ r C7 ~L! r ~ O ~ p~ r m N ~ r (D h T T r CO 1~ M h h ~ ~ '' CO r OD ln~ r LL O ~ ~ ti ~ N r ~ ~ ~ r r r N ~ V r M r M r (D ~'] r ~ O ~ ~ N 4 h ~ ~ ~ r r r c['a4 Nc0 r ~ Q ~ M O S 000 ~_ Iti fD a O M NS ~ u o~NO m~ci -~ timo ~ ti r ~ ~ r ~ OOMOOa0000C700CD aaQYOr OO43d OD00 a 000000N OaOCDO~ a00d'[DN a ~ (OOr40000NOOr ~ ~ G ocfloc'ia~ay ' ooronioooooi+oor u700If]N O~[]aQOOOOCo lJ. 4 1000 ONa~1 d o0 Q O lf1 N N I!'l O r d' G3 N M M C7 r 0 ~ N d Q N rti ~ r C') W i fiN T r r r N y ~m O O N OI F ~rnoaoo~n orn~no 0 0 s ° ~ ° ~O O coti ovo~c r[U arnoh o o ,°a O O ~ [O=O Nl~CO M O o6 Lf1 63 ' ~r~]1dI] ~ O I (~ r ]~ r M fO 1 i +~ O W N O Sl (D 1 Cfl C~7 C7 O r r N GO ~ N N N cpa041N~ 0040{] 00a 00C~]O~ O 4 W O 4 N O O a 4 CO O~ O Q O O O~ ~(Y] O'cr MBA OreC)O (00>700N O~ otio ~ ~~~_~~ oni~iooo prf O S O N [` In O a a 0 0 Lh C d ~, d, h N to O W [f OO 4 (A N C'7 V' N N M [+'] 67 r h a04 Nfh r rl~~ ~ 1~ ~O)Nr N r .~ m ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ al w U] D D D O ~ N d O ~ ~ N [d N 7Q V dDl ~ N~ ~ C GI .. ^ v ~ b a l6 ~j ~ C N N U ~ a ~ U S ~ ~ C R. '° E o ~ , °' m ~ to ~ CJ ~ ~ i ~ a ~ o ~ u w ~ h q ~' ~ C d d7 S 1 C N ~ OJ N ^ 7 ( ~ C 4] ~ 'a ~ l6 ~ ~ O N 0 +d L6 N C7 U tl • ~ C A} C ~ O d Ol LL }- ~~ ~ ^ fJ1 ~ ' ~ [ ~ N 4I N ~ ~~ 7 ~ + . ~ ll.l U N ~ am V U m N "' ++.+ -' w C ] C• '~ ~ c J,C .7 ~L ~ p zZ00 UUwr n~n oU w¢¢U~~w~~ r 0 o v o 0 o ti o 0 0 0 0 00{`0006'~OOOOa oao~ooo~naoco[fld' p ,~ 0 0~ O r aD O rs d' ab afL1~'n~a oN aOOIti~ u~rrnov~.n~ rnoo co N N C+Sr~M cp ui CV ~' h ~ O N O j C p N ~ N b VI l r1 L D lL~ o u~ u~ co r rn CD N N V' ~ ON<1'o000 h o~000a OhhcC7006~ cD000O O ffl ~? ~ O O ~f? N a [O CO ~i' avomo~am~no aim co aDl V [hOOM~!)O N~7r to (p 07 [O ~LL70r0 V 00 i~~, U ~ ~ >^ Q ~ ~ ~ C C W Q N C C GWV ~ D ~ ~.o ~~ .~ U U3 f6 N C C V ~ p '~ ~ X w ~ ~ ~ D Q-~m~'c~O ~..c~~ o(a~~ c a ~ ?'R ~ } N ~ ~ ~ D N ~l O ~ ~ N _~ N N ~ Ql C•~ ~N~9 O ~ to (6 LO m ~ ~ -~ ~ ° ~ a` U ~ is m c O ~, ~ d i Q ~ U U ~ 7 N Y d G C O~ 0 0 OO ULU iu.~~~~ u}..0.~~ ti w a en ar M r 0 N 1 0 N N /~ v N L 0 i~ 0 L a y~ ^L Yi #~ ~~ /~ V VF O rr~ v+ r O d 61 ~iS 4'~7 {~ T M LL 0 N M r r M ~ M O ti ~~ M ~ ~ N M M OY ~ r 0 M ~ O 6 1 ~ }} ~ ~L, O ~ M N r F r M ~ N M ~ ~ ~ ~" O [(' ~ ~ LL O ~A 61 L*! ~ T ~ r >v d ooooa du~A~ndo 00 dNd d M0000 ON6)POd Od OOP ~ r oOO o00 dd44 00 o O u~o orno~rnd O ~j4 4Nlnr pd O O ti 6 0 0 0 N M In N O 0 0 0 O [O ~ N d d d O O Q O r p O TD li7 N O O m i~ O 61 in O pCOOQO6]~ V OON O ~fr7 oornood d'rnlnaod Inaodr~ln ~ ~ 00040Q drdcocoo O r'~ NO EL)OM(`7OD dd Moo No LL O 61 N M O O O 6 r N N M O 67 r P N r N tl] M EA ~ d pp ~ r N IA N1 r QI (~[ r Qi d' l11 O r r N M - 1R 0i 61 fh d' r r 'y'~" I ~ 1 ~' -;1 OHO Ot~d~4~O~~~~t']~ {f~ Y1~r0'~-O IO~O`~O~N'~O~ O m~Od~Q`~d ~pa4h -~P-~007~,°~Q~Q~~Q~O~~~P p,~zs,..,, ~-~ ~~ ~i~~u Y"~t ~, -4~ O~ tD OO:PTd`~ C O~.O-N~.OOO- lL] pp~0af+-d~41, ~O~~. pp"'t0 ,OpO~O~O~C ~ O r O :.. N pi 3 ~ ~° Q~~4D~~~*~10 0~~~~~~~~~ ~µ, w-~' ~ OOQ 4-bO ~r~0~[D~IfDyO 00, ~~. ti~. M. ' 7f Y v. ~i7~OO~Q1 ~ =C376 O~. TO~O~~~~~~P. x ~ ~ r~" r~`' rte'. a [V~'O~O'.MM O_- O:~O~t'1]ti01 b~ ''f~P. 3r - ~ . ` ~ Y ~l7aO~d ~ O a r N . 'N -O p7E r N~1 ' ~~J ~~' ~ E6 O - N~ ~ ~ ~ '. O f T~O a0 =47f ~~ N ~ ~~. ~ ~~ I ~ I ~ y i a~0o r °pr~dddrn o o ° 00 ° ° ° w ~ ~ rnorn M- N ° - o r i d o o v OU c ,_ o N _ °co~nool~ o o c~ieoo p O N If) ti~cOr)CPOr dd' M ti~4PO N ~ r ~ N {rj 00 I~ P d' r 1+ OA0006)O1(]1~~ dd0¢O NO OOOOOONd000dddP4~ ti h ddOOQO 000000 OC 0 tI]0 0007(]004 d In4 OlCl 73lN40 N O O O V N M 1C1 N W 0 0 0 0 [0 96 6 1 T O O N O N O O l6 ~ ~ O6]r44NpV d' dONOOid h M r 0 P r ~ W 1() CO d ~1 Ip O 1~ ~ N 61 OOddd4 N r N IL? ~ C~7 1~ O CjO lfl b'NM DO d d M N 61 O N O ~ O fD M tf7 r- r N CO [~] d 0 r ~ ~ d ILy r r r ; o o ~ ~ rnioMlri r ~ c a r ~ N ~ ~ L VI y~ ~ ~. L ~U .~`o a v ~ a~i v m ~ ~ 7+ W C p7 C ~ U ~ ~ X1.1 'G C ~ C N N N ~ ~~ N 1.-. N L.L N {] ~ N ~ N p7 ~ Q1 O Q w F- ~- C ~` N dl ~ C G O 'O Q` 43 a_ i ~ ~ o E ~ m LL O I 6 N in a N C ~ ~ r ~ O (A C 78 ` O 7 4-• L Cn U ~ aC ~ ~ C „ ~ UJ O` ~ / . p N •- ~ ~ _ ~ ~ N ~ C (_ (J ~ ~ U rn N ~ ~ y N C ~ ~ C ~ E ~ c ~ ~ U~ E `~ arc ~ ~ ~'U ~ °' c ~c v, ~ ~ ~ ~ 7+ ~~ BIZ= a ~ p- v ~ a1°r<,'H°mco~u .U4 a m ~ ~' ° y ~ n~~~~,:~.E ° 7u~ ~~,~ ~ .5 ~ ~ ~ .N> a m ,n . ~ ~ ~ a ~ c f9 R ' E . N~ N Q~>- _ E.Y a ~+~ ~~ i ~ C ~ ~ Q ~ ~ C {T G N ~ ~ C ~ ~ 45 ~ y ~ IY ^ N ~ L I L ~ CIS ~ C -p ~ N N ~ ~L ~ U [.1 tiy (U J ¢ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ N C ~ L ~ E C ~ Id ~ } 7 ~ K E ~ (6 O Ui ~ ~ E i ~ E m c~ axi~J ~ a ~ o.E c~~ 0 ~~ ~ Z~tsa vf ~ °f OLr¢ ~~ ^~+ ~ t '~ ._ ~ [6 ~ ~ ~ qy L ~ - Q U T N LL Y 'C [ ? r{G.+ ~ ~ hl N N U} O O w o p ~~ C ~5 y N .~ C C + O +'a d O p N OT t9 U C .~ w ~ ~ Q7 {V~{1 .1 V +~ R° C -O ~ ~ ~ W .N W m ~ .~ ~ 3 ~ f~ F~ U ~ 'y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ Q ~ 111 Q ~ ~ C C U - O ' ~ 7 ~ ++ _ N !Z O a N ~ ~ .l>3 N L `~ p U~ N t O (0 C 7~ N~ N O 7 U tll Q. s.. W ld ~~ N~ ~ U OS ~ V Q 0) f4 ~ 7 d ~tl ~ vs O r¢¢UC)U^oo_~~zaarnl-- cn rn vUZ~1~- v~ I- ¢rnmmmc~csc: fl m m 0. M O N G~ O O N c~ c~ V N .~ LL. O L L a C ~} 0 c~ ._ v 0 c~ a APPENDIX B Adoption Ordinance 32