12-09-2021 VC REG-MMINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION
VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 9, 2021
Present: Darryl C. Aubrey, Sc.D., Mayor
Deborah Searcy, Vice Mayor
Mark Mullinix, President Pro Tem
David B. Norris, Councilmember
Susan Bickel, Councilmember
Andrew D. Lukasik, Village Manager
Len Rubin, Village Attorney
Tammy Held, Deputy Village Clerk
ROLL CALL
Mayor Aubrey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. All members of Council were present. All
members of staff were present.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Aubrey gave the invocation and Vice Mayor Searcy led the public in the Pledge.
AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
The Village Council accepted a prestigious award for the Country Club being named a
"Distinguished Golf Destination" by Boardroom Magazine, in partnership with Forbes Travel
Guide. Tom Fitzgerald, Managing Director at Distinguished Golf Destinations presented the award
and stated that the Country Club was evaluated based on conditions, service and overall
experience. They also found staff and management to be very impressive. In addition to the award,
Country Club General Manager Beth Davis, Head Golf Professional Allan Bowman, Golf Course
Superintendent Cory Adams and Farmer's Table Chef Michael Schenk were awarded individually
for their contributions to the Country Club's success.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Minutes of the Special Session held November 18, 2021 were approved as written.
STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Karen Marcus, 920 Evergreen Drive, along with members of the Environmental Committee
thanked the Council and Village staff for the Community Garden. Mayor Aubrey commented that
the Community Garden was very impressive and encouraged residents to stop by.
Fane Lozman, 5101 North Ocean Drive, distributed a handout to Council and asked them to review
the Village Manager's texts with Lisa Interlandi in regard to a trespass affidavit.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 2 of 9
STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC continued
Mr. Lozman also expressed his disappointment with how the Village cited his floating home at
Little Munyon Island.
Ryan Nagel, 136 Cruiser Road South, discussed his concerns regarding plans for a proposed
apartment complex at 200 Yacht Club Drive and expressed his opposition towards the project.
Chris Ryder, 118 Dory Road South, expressed his thoughts about zoning density changes in regard
to new housing developments and discussed concerns about how this may affect water usage in
the future.
Deborah Cross, 2560 Pepperwood Circle, stated that she would like North Palm Beach to remain
a family neighborhood and expressed concerns that high density development projects would
change the quality of life and feel of the community.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS
There were no ex -parte communications declared for the next two items.
ORDINANCE 2022-01 CODE AMENDMENT — FRACTIONAL HOME OWNERSHIP
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Councilmember Bickel to
adopt on first reading Ordinance 2022-01 entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX C (CHAPTER 45), "ZONING," OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO INCORPORATE A DEFINITION OF FRACTIONAL
OWNERSHIP AND EXPRESSLY PROHIBIT FRACTIONAL OWNERSHIP UNITS AND
TIME-SHARE UNITS IN THE VILLAGE'S RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS;
AMENDING SECTION 45-2, "DEFINITIONS," AND SECTION 45-36, "GENERAL
PROVISIONS;" PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Community Development Director Jeremy Hubsch gave a presentation regarding fractional
ownership properties and time-share units within the Village's residential zoning districts. Mr.
Hubsch explained the potential negative impacts on the Village and why fractional ownership units
and time-share units should be prohibited.
Mayor Aubrey opened the public hearing on the Fractional Home Ownership ordinance.
Deborah Cross, 2560 Pepperwood Circle South, expressed that she agreed with prohibiting
fractional home ownership.
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Aubrey closed the public hearing.
Vice Mayor Searcy asked what would happen to the existing properties that were for sale for
fractional ownership and questioned if the ordinance was broad enough to counter a potential
disruption to the market.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 3 of 9
ORDINANCE 2022-01 CODE AMENDMENT — FRACTIONAL HOME OWNERSHIP
continued
Mr. Rubin explained that it was an evolving process and that the status of specific properties would
need to be addressed in the future.
Mayor Aubrey had a question about procedures and asked what would prevent a group of people
or several family members from buying a property and creating a fractional ownership.
Discussion ensued between Council and Mr. Rubin regarding the language in the ordinance and
how it may pertain to properties registered as an LLC or corporation. There was concern whether
the definition of fractional home ownership in the ordinance would be specific enough to include
the types of ownership schemes it was intended to prohibit.
Councilmember Norris stated that the current wording of the ordinance would not prevent
fractional home ownership to properties registered as an LLC or corporation because everyone
would be considered an owner of the entity and would have rights under their operating agreement
to utilize the property.
The Council came to a consensus to have Mr. Rubin add additional language in regard to how the
ordinance would pertain to properties registered as an LLC or corporation.
Therefore, the motion to adopt on first reading Ordinance 2022-01 as amended passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE 2022-02 CODE AMENDMENT — PARKING CITATION PROCEDURE
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Councilmember Bickel to
adopt on first reading Ordinance 2022-02 entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ARTICLE III, "STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING,"
OF CHAPTER 18, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF
ORDINANCES TO UPDATE THE VILLAGE'S REGULATIONS AND FORMALIZE THE
PARKING CITATION PROCEDURE; AMENDING SECTION 18-34.1, "VEHICLE, TRAILER
OR BOAT PARKING PROHIBITED UPON PAVED OR UNPAVED AREA OF ROAD RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF SPECIFIC ROADWAYS," TO ALLOW FOR DAILY ENFORCEMENT OF THE
RESTRICTIONS IN SUBSECTION (B); REPEALING SECTION 18-36, "PARKING IN
VIOLATION OF SIGNS," SECTION 18-37, `VIOLATIONS; FINES — HANDICAP SPACES,"
AND SECTION 18-38, "SAME — NON -HANDICAP SPACES," AND ADOPTING A NEW
SECTION 18-36, "STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING IN SPECIFIED AREAS,"
SECTION 18-37, "PARKING CITATION PROCEDURE," SECTION 18-38, "FINES," AND
SECTION 18-39, "PARKING SPACES FOR THE PHYSICALLY DISABLED;" AMENDING
ARTICLE II, "BOAT LAUNCHING AREA," OF CHAPTER 5, "BOATS, DOCKS AND
WATERWAYS," BY REPEALING SECTION 5-38, "VIOLATION; PENALTY;" PROVIDING
FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Rubin explained that the purpose of the ordinance was to standardize the Village's procedures
for the issuance of parking citations and expand the Village's enforcement authority. Mr. Rubin
discussed what the ordinance would accomplish stating that it would expand restrictions on
parking on rights -of way in the vicinity of Lakeside Park. Enforcement of such restrictions would
occur on a daily basis in lieu of only weekends and holidays. The ordinance would also provide
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 4 of 9
ORDINANCE 2022-02 CODE AMENDMENT — PARKING CITATION continued
Cfor general prohibitions against parking on a sidewalk within any intersection or crosswalk, on a
bicycle path, within a marked fire lane or anywhere there is a sign that says "no parking." The
ordinance would set forth standard parking citation procedures and allow for the issuance of
citations by a Park Ranger. The ordinance would also provide procedures for the payment of fines,
the assessment of delinquent fines and a method for challenging a parking citation before the
Special Magistrate. A provision was also added to allow fines that remain unpaid to be referred to
collections. Mr. Rubin stated that fines for violations in regard to the boat ramp and launch area
was removed from the fine schedule. A proposed fine schedule for all civil and parking citations
would be presented at the first Council meeting in January.
Mayor Aubrey opened the public hearing on the Parking Citation ordinance.
Eric Hewko, 761 Dory Road, expressed his concerns about the restrictions of the parking citation
ordinance. Mr. Hewko did not feel that his street was affected by people parking there to go to
Lakeside Park, and concerned about his own guests not being able to park in the swale in front of
his home with the proposed restrictions. Mr. Hewko urged the Council to have further discussions
about the ordinance or vote to reject it.
John Samadi, 512 Marlin Road, expressed his concerns about the Council creating restrictions in
order to exclude non-residents from having access to Lakeside Park.
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Aubrey closed the public hearing.
Mr. Mullinix expressed concern about precluding residents or their guests from parking in front of
their homes on the swale.
Mr. Lukasik explained that the language in the code was broadly written, however the intent of the
ordinance was meant to focus on the adjacent areas surrounding Lakeside Park. Mr. Lukasik stated
that the parking pass system would be a way to accommodate residents who have a need for visitors
to park in front of their home, and stated that Council may revise the language in the ordinance to
further clarify parking enforcement.
Council discussion ensued regarding the language of the ordinance and how to properly enforce
it. The Council suggested that Mr. Rubin revise the ordinance's language by removing certain
streets that were not affected, and to include verbiage regarding the resident parking pass and to
revise the language amending Section 18-34.1 in regard to parking restrictions.
Mr. Rubin proposed to move forward with addressing the parking citation procedural issues and
suggested that the Council could remove Section 18-34.1 from the ordinance. Mr. Rubin stated he
would revise the language and bring Section 18-34.1 and other areas of concern back before the
Council as a separate ordinance.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Searcy and seconded by Councilmember Norris to delete
Jam' Section 18-34.1 from the ordinance. Thereafter, the motion to adopt on first reading Ordinance
2022-02 as amended passed unanimously.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 5 of 9
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED
�f r
Items 5, 7, and 8 were removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda.
Thereafter, the Consent agenda, as amended was approved unanimously. The following items were
approved:
Resolution amending the Comprehensive Pay Plan adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget
to include two additional part-time Solid Waste Refuse Collector positions.
Receive for file Minutes of the Police and Fire Pension Board meeting held 8/10/21.
Receive for file Minutes of the Golf Advisory Board meeting held 10/25/21.
Receive for file Minutes of the Recreation Advisory Board meeting held 11/9/21.
Receive for file Minutes of the Waterways Board meeting held 11/17/21.
RESOLUTION 2021-96 — AMENDMENT TO ARBORICULTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT
AT THE NORTH PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
A motion was made by Councilmember Norris and seconded by President Pro Tem Mullinix to
adopt Resolution 2021-96 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH ALL
FLORIDA TREE AND LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR ARBORICULTURAL SERVICES AT THE
NORTH PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND VILLAGE CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF THE
VILLAGE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
John Samadi, 512 Marlin Road, questioned why the amendment was necessary to the arboricultural
contract. Mr. Samadi stated that there was no quantitative way to measure compensation and
questioned why it was not discussed in the original scope of the contract.
Head Golf Professional Allan Bowman explained that there was a change in the scope of the project
due to discovering trees on the golf course that were rotting and had to be removed.
Thereafter, the motion to adopt Resolution 2021-96 passed with all present voting aye.
RESOLUTION 2021-98 — AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR MILLING, RESURFACING
AND STRIPING OF SPECIFIED VILLAGE ROADWAYS
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Councilmember Bickel to
adopt Resolution 2021-98 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT
WITH J.W. CHEATHAM LLC FOR MILLING, RESURFACING AND STRIPING OF
f SPECIFIED VILLAGE ROADWAYS TO MODIFY THE SCOPE AND INCREASE THE
`. _.i COST; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 6 of 9
RESOLUTION 2021-98 — AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR MILLING, RESURFA
AND STRIPING OF SPECIFIED VILLAGE ROADWAYS continued
President Pro Tem Mullinix expressed concern in regard to the $10,000 cost estimate for irrigation
listed in the contractor's proposal. Mr. Mullinix questioned if there was an irrigation specialist on
Village staff who could potentially do this portion of the work for less money.
Public Works Director Chuck Huff stated that there was an irrigation specialist on staff, however
he tried to keep all costs inclusive to the project.
John Samadi, 512 Marlin Road, asked why this amendment was not part of the original contract
and questioned the necessity and cost benefit of the project.
Thereafter, the motion to adopt Resolution 2021-98 passed with all present voting aye.
RESOLUTION 2021-99 — LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE AGENCY ADVOCACY SERVICES
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Councilmember Bickel to
adopt Resolution 2021-99 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BALLARD PARTNERS, INC.
FOR PROFESSIONAL LOBBYING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; WAIVING THE VILLAGE'S PURCHASING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Lukasik stated that Ballard Partners, Inc. reduced the cost amount of the contract from $72,000
to $60,000.
Councilmember Norris declared a voting conflict and did not participate in the discussion or vote.
Thereafter, the motion to adopt Resolution 2021-99 passed 4-0, with Mayor Aubrey, Vice Mayor
Searcy, President Pro Tem Mullinix, and Councilmember Bickel voting aye.
OTHER VILLAGE BUSINESS MATTERS
PRESENTATION - UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING MASTER PLAN AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
Brett Johnson from Kimley Horn gave a presentation regarding plans to underground overhead
utility lines throughout the Village and discussed the overall potential cost impact. Mr. Johnson
discussed the various phasing sequences beginning in 2023 and anticipated completion in 2036.
Costs were broken down by contingency, projected inflation, phases and line items. The total cost
was projected at $206 million. Mr. Johnson discussed grant funding that could help offset projected costs.
Council discussion ensued regarding the potential costs.
Mr. Lukasik explained that the purpose for the stud was to provide Council with the data however
P p � Y
the next step would be to look into different funding options with financial consultants to see how
they can offset the projected cost of the project.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 7 of 9
PRESENTATION — TWIN CITY MALL MARKET ANALYSIS
Kim DeLaney from Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Tom Lavash from WTL+a Real
Estate and Economic Advisors and Tom Moriarity from Retail and Development Strategies, LLC
gave a presentation and conducted a market analysis and financial feasibility study for the Twin
City Mall property located at the southwest corner on U.S. 1 and Northlake Boulevard. The
purpose of the study was to determine what new uses would be economically viable at the location
and what type of development plan would be needed to attract investment to the site and to develop
a regulatory plan, or zoning code, that would be financially feasible for future investors. The
economic consultants reviewed demographics, economic profiles, and real estate market
conditions as part of their analysis. Next steps in the process would be to select development
scenarios, initiate financial feasibility analysis, prepare a summary of findings and schedule a staff
workshop and final presentation.
RESOLUTION 2021-100 — QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Vice Mayor Searcy to remove
Resolution 2021-100 from the table. Thereafter, the motion to remove Resolution 2021-100 from
the table passed unanimously.
A motion was made by President Pro Tem Mullinix and seconded by Councilmember Bickel to
adopt Resolution 2021-100 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO QUASI-JUDICIAL
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mr. Rubin discussed additional language that was added to expand the definition of an interested
person in regard to quasi-judicial proceedings. The definition was expanded to include persons
who may not reside or own a business within 500 feet of the property, or who would suffer a
negative effect to a protected interest as a result of the quasi-judicial application. Mr. Rubin further
explained that procedures were modified to allow the Community Development Director to verify
interested person status and allow community associations to represent multiple interested persons
within the same community. An additional change was made to allow the Village Council or
Planning Commission to make decisions if they wish to continue the proceeding.
John Samadi, 512 Marlin Road, expressed that he found a sentence in the resolution confusing
which stated that the adoption of the resolution was in the best interests of the residents and citizens
of the Village of North Palm Beach. Mr. Samadi suggested that it would be more clear to only use
the word residents instead of citizens.
Vice Mayor Searcy questioned how much time the applicant, staff, and any interested person
would have to give their presentation. Mr. Rubin stated they would be limited to 20 minutes.
Thereafter, the motion to adopt Resolution 2021-100 passed unanimously.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 8 of 9
DISCUSSION — LAKESIDE PARK PARKING PASS SYSTEM
Director of Leisure Services Zak Sherman gave a presentation regarding implementing a parking
pass system at Lakeside Park. Mr. Sherman explained there was a parking shortage at Lakeside
Park, particularly on weekends and holidays which has created an impact on the surrounding
neighborhood. Over 80 percent of the volume can be attributed to vehicles registered to non -
Village residents. Mr. Sherman discussed ways to reduce the parking congestion by eliminating
on -street parking in the surrounding neighborhood and accommodating more resident parking.
Staff proposed free annual permits for residents and paid annual permits for non-residents. Each
year, the dashboard placards would need to be reissued. Additionally, a Park Ranger has been hired
to help educate patrons and enforce the rules.
Chris Ryder, 118 Dory Road South, expressed his approval of the proposed parking pass system,
but had concerns about the Village potentially giving up grant money. Mr. Ryder stated that the
parking should be split evenly between residents and non-residents, however he would like to also
see discussion about issues raised by residents on a higher priority.
Ryan Nagel, 136 Cruiser Road South, expressed his approval with the idea of non-residents paying
for parking but suggested they also sign a liability waiver. Mr. Nagel stated that Lakeside Park
was situated within a neighborhood, that was different from other Village parks.
Councilmember Bickel proposed an idea to have the majority of the parking spots marked for
Village residents which would require the free parking pass, and to leave a few spots available to
allow non-residents to park without having to pay. Councilmember Bickel stated that non-residents
parked in marked resident spots should have to pay a significantly higher fine if they violate the rules.
Council discussion ensued about how many resident and non-resident parking spots there should be.
Bob Silvani, 100 Cruiser Road South, stated there should not be as much focus about how many
parking spots were available for residents and non-residents. The focus should be about the
residents having the ability to access the park and non-residents should have to pay a fee for use.
Mayor Aubrey expressed concern about limiting access to the park, but would like to try to resolve
the parking issues.
Vice Mayor Searcy expressed concern about the loss of grant funds for future projects if Lakeside
Park became private.
The Council directed staff to research how a parking pass system might affect future grant
opportunities for park projects.
COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION MATTERS
Mr. Rubin discussed communications received from the Attorney General's office in regard to
whether the Council had any interest participating in an ongoing opioid litigation. There would not
be a cost to participate and the Village could potentially receive between four and eight thousand
dollars per year over the next ten years. Any funds received would be required to go towards
addressing the opioid crisis through education, training, or prevention programs.
Minutes of the Village Council Regular Session held December 9, 2021 Page 9 of 9
COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION MATTERS continued
Vice Mayor Searcy inquired if it could potentially cost the Village more than four thousand dollars
of staff time hours.
Police Chief Jenkins said that it could and stated he was in favor of receiving funding, but had
concerns about spending more money in staff education than we may receive.
Mr. Rubin explained that a Memo of Understanding could be executed detailing more specifics
and informed the Council that they could decide to opt -out of the litigation at a later date.
A motion was made by Councilmember Bickel and seconded by Vice Mayor Searcy to participate
in the opioid litigation, however Mr. Rubin will do further research and bring back documents for
discussion in January.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:37 p.m.
Tammy Held, Deputy Village Clerk
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOWING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME --FIRST NAME—MIDDLE NAME
Norris David B.
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Village Council Of the Village of North Palm Beach
MAILING ADDRESS
501 U.S.- HI hwa 1
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
ifCITY OCOUNTY DOTHERLOCALAGENCY
CITY COUNTY
North Palm Beach Palm Beach
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
Villacie of North Palm Beach
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
December 9 2021
MY PO ITIONIS: V ELECTIVE O APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 813
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of
interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on
a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she Is retained
(including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a
relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies (CRAs) under
Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited
from voting in that capacity. .
For purposes of this law; a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are
abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise
participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision,
whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2)
CE FORM 88 - EFF 11/2013 PAGE 1
Adopted by reference in Rule 3¢7.010(1)0, F.A.C.
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1 vjD A h)2ee , hereby disclose that on , 20
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more)
_ inured to my special private gain or loss; -7
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ;
inured to the special gain or loss of
whom I am retained; or
_ inured to the special gain or loss of
is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measura is as follows:
69 Lo rf
4 �ac'-/f O)JYA ea
44 (3ik Q
//oof Y/lPfs
15 a 55 C
1, en4 o� 1rX (Ir/y) 4
, by
, which
144"ief
S
If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer,
who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way
as. to provide the public with notice of the conflict. %1
�1
Date Filed Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF 1112013 PAGE 2
Adapted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)0, FA.C.